Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Completed
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT05912491 |
Other study ID # |
KBET/228/B/2010 |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Completed |
Phase |
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
July 1, 2012 |
Est. completion date |
May 30, 2023 |
Study information
Verified date |
June 2023 |
Source |
Jagiellonian University |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Observational
|
Clinical Trial Summary
Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and urinary incontinence (UI) are common female disorders.
Accurate diagnosis of the aetiology of pelvic organ descent and prolapse with or without
accompanying urination disorders is essential for appropriate therapeutic management. Imaging
and functional urodynamic testing are being increasingly used in the diagnosis of this
pathology, because precise assessment of the damage to the supporting and ligament apparatus
is essential for therapeutic success. Pelvic floor ultrasound can facilitate dynamic
assessment of static changes that occur during functional tests. Such assessments can provide
additional insights into existing defects, which have explorative value and allow for
targeted correction of damage, and may thus indirectly contribute to reduced rates of
revision surgeries.
Description:
Application of the ultrasound transducer to the patient's perineum can visualise three female
pelvic compartments, and the images can be frozen to assess the positions of anatomical
structures in relation to the pelvic bones and the pre-set planes as well as measure their
mutual distances and predefined angles.
The aim of the study was to assess the utility of ultrasound in the detection of UI,
particularly for establishing the most useful anatomical and functional parameters and to
propose cut-off points for ultrasonographic parameters. The presence of stress urinary
incontinence (SUI) requiring surgical management was the inclusion criterion. All patients
underwent transperineal ultrasound (TPU) with a Voluson E6 (GE Medical systems, Milwaukee,
WI, USA). The probe was oriented to coaxially visualise the pubic symphysis on one side and
the anus and rectum on the other side of the 2D image. When all three compartments could not
be visualised in one image, one image showing the anterior and medial compartments and
another image showing the medial and posterior compartments were obtained instead. Next,
3D/4D ultrasound was performed to obtain an image in the coronal plane at the level of the
arms of the levator ani muscle, showing the pubic symphysis and the anus. All measurements
were performed in three states: during pelvic muscle relaxation, during Valsalva manoeuvre,
and during perineal squeezing. The following quantitative parameters were assessed and
compared across two arms of the study (with and without SUI):
- Bladder-symphysis distance (BSD) - measured as the distance between the urine bladder
neck and the symphysis,
- Alpha angle - the angle between the axis of the proximal urethra and the x-axis of the
symphysis pubis (central line),
- Beta angle - the angle between the line parallel to the proximal urethra and the line
parallel to the distal axis of urethra,
- Gamma angle - the angle between the lower margin of the symphysis pubis and the urinary
bladder neck),
- Retrovesical angle (RVA) - the angle between the axis of the proximal urethra and the
tangent line to the lowest part of the posterior wall of the urinary bladder,
- Mean urethral diameter - the sum of the urethral diameters at three points (proximal,
central, and distal parts) divided by 3.