Comparison of Efficacy and Side Effects Between the Obtryx and Solyx Band With 5-year Follow-up.

Stress Urinary Incontinence Clinical Trial

Official title:

Comparison of Efficacy and Side Effects Between the Obtryx and Solyx Band With 5-year Follow-up. Prospective, Randomized and Non-inferiority Study

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT03916471
• Other study ID #: BOSTON2018
• Status: Recruiting
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: December 21, 2018
• Est. completion date: January 1, 2025

Study information

• Verified date: September 2023
• Source: Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria La Fe
• Contact: Maria Cortell
• Phone: 0034961246711
• Email: investigacion_clinica[@]iislafe.es
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Boston2018 post-market clinical study is a prospective, randomized, non-inferiority study to assess the efficacy and adverse events of the Solyx™ Single Incision Sling (SIS) System compared to the gold-standard Obtryx™ II Sling System, in patients with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and long-term follow-up (5 years).

Description:

Randomized prospective non-inferiority study, in which we evaluate patients with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) who undergo surgical treatment consisting of a minimal incision in the suburethral area of the vaginal mucosa for a mesh insertion in order to: Main Objective: To compare the continence rate (objective) between Solyx and Obtryx II meshes in patients with SUI. This rate will be determined by an effort test. Secondary Objectives: - To compare the continence rate (subjective) between both meshes. - To compare variations in Pad-Test. - To asses patient satisfaction. - To evaluate both techniques regarding quality and sexual life modifications. - To compare both techniques regarding early complications (up to 30 days post implantation). - To compare the appearance and persistence of late complications (from 30 days onwards).

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Recruiting
• Enrollment: 166
• Est. completion date: January 1, 2025
• Est. primary completion date: January 1, 2025
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: Female
• Age group: 40 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• patients diagnosed with symptomatic stress urinary incontinence candidates for stress-free bands
• Age > or = 40 years
• informed consent signed by the patient

Exclusion Criteria:

• patients who are pregnant or wish to become
• patients who need anticoagulant
• active vaginal or urinary infection
• previous surgical interventions for the treatment of incontinence
• body mass index > 35

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Enuresis
• Stress Urinary Incontinence
• Urinary Incontinence
• Urinary Incontinence, Stress

Intervention

Device:
• Solyx™ SIS System
Single-incision sling system
• Obtryx™ II System (Halo)
Transobturator Mid-urethral Sling System

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Spain	Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe	Valencia

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria La Fe

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Spain, 

References & Publications (10)

Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, Griffiths D, Rosier P, Ulmsten U, Van Kerrebroeck P, Victor A, Wein A; Standardisation Sub-Committee of the International Continence Society. The standardisation of terminology in lower urinary tract function: report from the standardisation sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Urology. 2003 Jan;61(1):37-49. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(02)02243-4. No abstract available. — View Citation

Ford AA, Rogerson L, Cody JD, Aluko P, Ogah JA. Mid-urethral sling operations for stress urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 31;7(7):CD006375. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006375.pub4. — View Citation

Ford AA, Rogerson L, Cody JD, Ogah J. Mid-urethral sling operations for stress urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jul 1;(7):CD006375. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006375.pub3. — View Citation

Haylen BT, de Ridder D, Freeman RM, Swift SE, Berghmans B, Lee J, Monga A, Petri E, Rizk DE, Sand PK, Schaer GN; International Urogynecological Association; International Continence Society. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Neurourol Urodyn. 2010;29(1):4-20. doi: 10.1002/nau.20798. — View Citation

Nambiar A, Cody JD, Jeffery ST, Aluko P. Single-incision sling operations for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 26;7(7):CD008709. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008709.pub3. — View Citation

Nilsson CG, Palva K, Rezapour M, Falconer C. Eleven years prospective follow-up of the tension-free vaginal tape procedure for treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008 Aug;19(8):1043-7. doi: 10.1007/s00192-008-0666-z. Epub 2008 Jun 6. — View Citation

Thom DH, Nygaard IE, Calhoun EA. Urologic diseases in America project: urinary incontinence in women-national trends in hospitalizations, office visits, treatment and economic impact. J Urol. 2005 Apr;173(4):1295-301. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000155679.77895.cb. — View Citation

Ulmsten U, Henriksson L, Johnson P, Varhos G. An ambulatory surgical procedure under local anesthesia for treatment of female urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 1996;7(2):81-5; discussion 85-6. doi: 10.1007/BF01902378. — View Citation

Ward KL, Hilton P; UK and Ireland TVT Trial Group. Tension-free vaginal tape versus colposuspension for primary urodynamic stress incontinence: 5-year follow up. BJOG. 2008 Jan;115(2):226-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01548.x. Epub 2007 Oct 25. — View Citation

Yalcin I, Bump RC. Validation of two global impression questionnaires for incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Jul;189(1):98-101. doi: 10.1067/mob.2003.379. — View Citation

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Continence rate (Objective) assessed by an effort test	For the analysis of the objective cure of incontinence, an effort test will be carried out through three strokes of cough, with bladder volume between 200-300 ml in a lithotomy position.	Month 1
Primary	Continence rate (Objective) assessed by an effort test	For the analysis of the objective cure of incontinence, an effort test will be carried out through three strokes of cough, with bladder volume between 200-300 ml in a lithotomy position.	Month 6
Primary	Continence rate (Objective) assessed by an effort test	For the analysis of the objective cure of incontinence, an effort test will be carried out through three strokes of cough, with bladder volume between 200-300 ml in a lithotomy position.	Year 1
Primary	Continence rate (Objective) assessed by an effort test	For the analysis of the objective cure of incontinence, an effort test will be carried out through three strokes of cough, with bladder volume between 200-300 ml in a lithotomy position.	Year 2
Primary	Continence rate (Objective) assessed by an effort test	For the analysis of the objective cure of incontinence, an effort test will be carried out through three strokes of cough, with bladder volume between 200-300 ml in a lithotomy position.	Year 3
Primary	Continence rate (Objective) assessed by an effort test	For the analysis of the objective cure of incontinence, an effort test will be carried out through three strokes of cough, with bladder volume between 200-300 ml in a lithotomy position.	Year 4
Primary	Continence rate (Objective) assessed by an effort test	For the analysis of the objective cure of incontinence, an effort test will be carried out through three strokes of cough, with bladder volume between 200-300 ml in a lithotomy position.	Year 5
Secondary	Continence rate (Subjective) assessed by Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Short Form (ICQ-SF)	Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Short Form (ICQ-SF): continent patient when the reduction is equal to or greater than 50% of the value prior to the intervention.	Month 1, month 6, year 1, year 2, year 3, year 4 and year 5.
Secondary	Pad test	1 hour pad test: After a spontaneous urination the patient will place a compress that will be weighed previously.; After, the patient has to drink a half liter of water in 15 minutes sitting. Between the minute 15 to 45 has to walk and / or go up / down stairs. From minute 45-60 the patient has to get up and sit 10 times, cough 10 times, run 1 minute, lift an object from the ground 10 times and washes his/her hands 1 minute.; According to the difference in weight of the compress, it will be cataloged as follows: = 1 gram -> continent. 1.1-9.9 grams -> mild incontinence. 10-49.9 grams -> moderate incontinence. > 50 grams -> severe incontinence	Month 1, month 6, year 1, year 2, year 3, year 4 and year 5.
Secondary	Patient satisfaction assessed by PGI-I (Patient Global Impression of Improvement)	PGI-I consider a patient satisfied when the patient answer " better or much better".	Month 1, month 6, year 1, year 2, year 3, year 4 and year 5.
Secondary	Patient satisfaction assessed by the "Global Satisfaction Test"	Global satisfaction assessment will be required, with a rank 1-5, being 1 very satisfied and 5 very dissatisfied.	Month 1, month 6, year 1, year 2, year 3, year 4 and year 5.
Secondary	Patient satisfaction assessed by the "Recommendations questionnarie"	The recommendation grade will be assessed through the question "will you recommend this surgical treatment for other patients?", the possible answer are Yes or No.	Month 1, month 6, year 1, year 2, year 3, year 4 and year 5.
Secondary	Evaluation of life quality improvement assessed by I-QoL questionnaire (Urinary Incontinence-Specific Quality of Life Instrument)	To assess the life quality impact, I-QoL questionnaire (Urinary Incontinence-Specific Quality of Life Instrument) will be used , this questionnaire, is composed by 22 items. The highest punctuation mean better life quality. The modification of 2.5 points, which has been considered in this questionnaire, is the minimum clinically significant modification in patients presenting SUI. This questionnaire is validated in Spanish.	Month 1, month 6, year 1, year 2, year 3, year 4 and year 5.
Secondary	Evaluation of sexual life, assessed by PSIQ 12 questionnaire (Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire )	To assess the impact on sexual life, the PSIQ 12 questionnaire (Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire ) will be used. It is composed of 12 items graded from "never" to "always". This questionnaire is validated in heterosexual women who have urinary incontinence and / or pelvic organ prolapse. Scores are calculated for each item with a value of "always = 0" and for "never = 4". It is used inversely in items 1-4.	Month 1, month 6, year 1, year 2, year 3, year 4 and year 5.
Secondary	Early complications assessed by Post-Mictional Residue	Are considered by the urgency of urination, the inability to void, the presence of PMR greater than 50% of the total volume after spontaneous voiding or the presence of pain that prevents ambulation, in the first 30 days after the intervention.; For the elevated PMR assessment, perineal ultrasound measurement will be carried out after spontaneous micturition. If the PMR measurement will be higher or equal, probing would be performed to obtain the exact residue. If it is pathological, proceed according to the usual practice.	Day 0, 7-10 days after the intervention, Month 1
Secondary	Early complications assessed by OAB-q questionnaire (Overactive Bladder symptom and health-related quality of life questionnaire)	OAB-q questionnaire (Overactive Bladder symptom and health-related quality of life questionnaire). Individual answer punctuation: lowest 0, highest 5 .If the score =8 will proceed according to the usual practice.	Day 0, 7-10 days after the intervention, Month 1
Secondary	Long term complications assessed by OAB-q questionnaire (Overactive Bladder symptom and health-related quality of life questionnaire)	OAB-q questionnaire (Overactive Bladder symptom and health-related quality of life questionnaire). Individual answer punctuation: lowest 0, highest 5 .If the score =8 will proceed according to the usual practice.	Month 1, month 6, year 1, year 2, year 3, year 4 and year 5.
Secondary	Early complications assessed by VAS (Visual Analogue Scale)	Only when the patient has a pain that prevents ambulation. VAS: Pain scale for quantification of pain. Range 0 to 10. 0: No pain 5: Distressing pain 10: Unbearable pain	Day 0, 7-10 days after the intervention, Month 1
Secondary	Long term complications assessed by "Extrusion" (integrity of the vaginal mucus)	Extrusion: The integrity of the vaginal mucus will be checked in all the visits that are made. If there is evidence of mesh extrusion, it is classified as asymptomatic / symptomatic and according to its size (greater or less than 1 cm).	Month 1, month 6, year 1, year 2, year 3, year 4 and year 5.
Secondary	Long term complications assessed by emergence of recurrent urinary tract infections (UTIs)	Urinary tract infection: in the presence of at least 1 monthly urinary tract infections (UTI), the patient will be considered to have developed repeat UTIs.	Month 1, month 6, year 1, year 2, year 3, year 4 and year 5.
Secondary	Long term complications assessed by "Emptying dysfunction"	Persistent urinary retention at 30 days will be considered as a long term complication.	Month 1, month 6, year 1, year 2, year 3, year 4 and year 5.