Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Summary

FGBMM (footwear generated biomechanical manipulation) effects neuromuscular patterns of pelvic muscles. While there have been no published studies to our knowledge investigating the effect of FGBMM on urinary incontinence, FGBMM causes perturbations in balance and gait that create dynamics similar to dynamic lumbosacral stabilization exercises. The investigators propose that FGBMM induces the same bio-mechanical improvements as LPSE (lumbopelvic stabilization exercises) which have shown benefit for incontinence. Instead of instructing patients to co-contract the lower trunk and pelvic floor muscles as commonly done for LPSE, the shoes used in FGBMM can be calibrated in a way that causes this co-contraction to occur without the patient realizing. Beneficial pelvis and spine positioning can also be accomplished by strategic placement of the pods without having to instruct the patient on complicated maneuvers. Capitalizing on the excellent adherence and clinical benefits of FGBMM on related conditions, the investigators propose to evaluate the effects of FGBMM in addition to pelvic floor therapy for improving the symptoms of stress urinary incontinence in an urban inner city population.


Clinical Trial Description

FGBMM (footwear generated biomechanical manipulation) effects neuromuscular patterns of pelvic muscles. While there have been no published studies to our knowledge investigating the effect of FGBMM on urinary incontinence, FGBMM has been shown to cause perturbations in balance and gait that create dynamics similar to dynamic lumbosacral stabilization exercises. In support of this theory, although not published, one of the founders of the technique, Avi Elbaz, has noted anecdotal evidence that patients who had SUI (stress urinary incontinence) and underwent FGBMM for knee or low back pain reported improvement of incontinence. The investigators propose that FGBMM induces the same bio-mechanical improvements as LPSE (lumbopelvic stabilization exercises) which have shown benefit for incontinence. The pods on the footwear can be positioned to challenge the patients balance in a manner similar to the way trampolines are utilized in LPSE. Instead of instructing patients to co-contract the lower trunk and pelvic floor muscles as commonly done for LPSE, the shoes used in FGBMM can be calibrated in a way that causes this co-contraction to occur without the patient realizing. Beneficial pelvis and spine positioning can also be accomplished by strategic placement of the pods without having to instruct the patient on complicated maneuvers. An additional advantage of FGBMM is that this exercise is done with increased intra-abdominal pressure mimicking the condition and the setting when incontinence occurs rather than static exercise that is used in PFT. While performing regular activities, people are naturally squatting and doing other activities that increase intra-abdominal pressure. Furthermore, FGBMM is more practical for people with busy schedules because it can be accomplished with a much smaller time commitment from the patient than traditional PFT since it is done during normal activity. Capitalizing on the excellent adherence and clinical benefits of FGBMM on related conditions, the investigators propose to evaluate the effects of FGBMM in addition to pelvic floor therapy for improving the symptoms of stress urinary incontinence in an urban inner city population. A potential use of FGBMM using shoes as a addition to traditional pelvic floor therapy may yield a more effective therapy with better adherence. Problems with traditional therapy include poor patient adherence (patients often do not complete the sessions and have poor adherence (about 50%), lack of the continuation in an ongoing program, leading to relapse and need for re treatment or even little clinical benefit. Additionally, access to pelvic floor therapy is limited for many patients since there are not enough available outpatient therapy services to meet the needs of all patients. Finding an additional exercise program that will increase adherence and improve patient outcomes with better clinical benefits is a high priority from both patient care and cost management perspectives. FGBMM using shoes potentially overcomes many of these issues with improving/modifying abnormal biomechanics of pelvic floor muscles (therefore decreasing incontinence), and a home based exercise program utilizing footwear that causes exercise with normal activity by promoting perturbation. This bio-mechanical approach may significantly improve the symptoms of urinary incontinence in patients with Stress SUI or Mixed urinary incontinence. Capitalizing on the reported excellent adherence and clinical benefit of FGBMM in patients with related conditions, the investigators propose to evaluate the bio-mechanical exercise (wearing an appropriately calibrated shoe at home for a prescribed amount of time each day) as a conservative treatment that may supplement traditional pelvic floor therapy, medications and even surgical intervention for the same in an inner urban city population. ;


Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


NCT number NCT03194789
Study type Interventional
Source Montefiore Medical Center
Contact
Status Completed
Phase N/A
Start date November 29, 2017
Completion date December 12, 2023

See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT04829357 - Post Market Clinical Follow-up Study on TVT ABBREVO® Continence System
Completed NCT05493735 - Lidocaine for Pessary Check Pain Reduction Phase 3
Completed NCT04512053 - A Phase 2 Study of TAS-303 in Female Patients With Stress Urinary Incontinence Phase 2
Active, not recruiting NCT06224335 - Measurement of Intravaginal and Intra-abdominal Pressure and Pad Test During Sports Activities (SPORTVAGPRES)
Recruiting NCT05304312 - The Role of Kegel Exercises Book to Improve Treatment in Stress Urinary Incontinence Women N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT05527665 - Sexual Fonction and Discomfort in Women After Midurethral Sling Surgery, Using PPSSQ
Not yet recruiting NCT04558762 - Ten Years Follow-up After Insertion of a MUS (Mid Urethral Sling) Due to Stress Urinary Incontinence
Withdrawn NCT02524366 - A Study of Transcorporal Versus Standard Artificial Urinary Sphincter Placement N/A
Completed NCT01924728 - Efficacy of Magnetic Stimulation for Stress Urinary Incontinence N/A
Completed NCT01676662 - Solace European Confirmatory Trial N/A
Unknown status NCT01455779 - Lyrette: Renewing Continence Objective and Subjective Efficacy Study N/A
Terminated NCT01029106 - Gynecare TVT Secur for the Management of Stress Urinary Incontinence (SUI) N/A
Completed NCT01770691 - Preliminary Performance Study of the New TIPI Device in the Prevention of Stress Urinary Incontinence N/A
Withdrawn NCT00573703 - Laparoscopic Burch Colposuspension Versus Transobturatory Tape for the Treatment of Female Urinary Stress Incontinence Phase 4
Completed NCT01123096 - Is the Cough Stress Test Equivalent to the 24 Hour Pad Test in the Assessment of Stress Incontinence? N/A
Completed NCT00234754 - Trans-Obturator Tape Versus Trans-Vaginal Tape for Stress Urinary Incontinence in Women N/A
Completed NCT00441454 - Retropubic vs. Transobturator Tension-free Vaginal Tape N/A
Completed NCT03985345 - Prospective Evaluation of the Connected EMY Biofeedback Probe in the Management of Stress Urinary Incontinence. N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT03671694 - Laser Vaginal Treatment for SUI N/A
Completed NCT04097288 - Effects of Single Dose Citalopram and Reboxetine on Urethral and Anal Closure Function on Healthy Female Subjects Phase 1