Sterilization, Tubal Clinical Trial
Official title:
Comparison of Results of Different Surgical Techniques Used in Female Tubal Sterilization
Verified date | March 2020 |
Source | Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat University |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
The investigator's aim in this study is to compare the results of tubal ligation surgery, one of the contraceptive methods, between different surgical techniques. 194 patients were included in the study. Of these patients, 104 had vaginal approach, 44 had laparotomic and 46 had laparoscopic tube ligation surgery. These surgical techniques are statistically was compared; Visual Analog Pain Scale (VAS) after surgery, in terms of duration of surgery, length of hospital stay, cost to hospital and amount of blood loss. As a result of the analysis; tubal sterilization technique performed with vaginal colpotomy were found to be more successful than other techniques; Visual Analog Pain Scale score, postoperative hospital stay, operation time and cost.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 194 |
Est. completion date | January 1, 2020 |
Est. primary completion date | December 18, 2018 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | Female |
Age group | 32 Years and older |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Over 31 years old - Have completed the fertility request - Accepting informed consent Exclusion Criteria: - Being under the age of 32 - Having a child desire |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
n/a |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat University |
ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 208: Benefits and Risks of Sterilization. Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Mar;133(3):e194-e207. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003111. — View Citation
Chang WH, Liu JY, Yeh YC, Wu GJ, Chiang YJ, Yu MH, Chen CH. Tubal ligation via colpotomy or laparoscopy: a retrospective comparative study. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2011 Apr;283(4):805-8. doi: 10.1007/s00404-010-1435-z. Epub 2010 Mar 26. — View Citation
Härkki-Siren P, Sjöberg J, Kurki T. Major complications of laparoscopy: a follow-up Finnish study. Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Jul;94(1):94-8. — View Citation
Schlaeder G, Boudier E. [Tubal sterilization]. Rev Prat. 2002 Oct 15;52(16):1790-4. Review. French. — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Visual Analog Pain Scale (VAS) | postoperative pain degree. 0-10 point. 0 worst, 10 best | postoperative 6th hour | |
Primary | Visual Analog Pain Scale (VAS) | postoperative pain degree. 0-10 point. 0 worst, 10 best | postoperative 24th hour | |
Primary | the amount of bleeding | preoperative and postoperative hemogram differences | 24 hour | |
Primary | length of hospital stay | postoperative hospitalization | 48 hour | |
Primary | duration of surgery | The time from the administration of anesthesia to the end of the operation | minimum duration of surgery 15 minute, maximum duration of surgery 60 minute |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT02165709 -
Cohort Study of Risk Reducing Salpingectomy
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT01558882 -
Impact of Essure Tubal Sterilization Devices on the Endometrium
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03761862 -
Evaluation of the Neural Therapy Effect on Long Term Postoperative Discomforts in Patients Who Undergo Bilateral Tubal Ligation
|
||
Completed |
NCT03830502 -
Driving Factors of Decision Making for Prophylactic Salpingectomy Versus Tubal Ligation at the Time of Cesarean Section
|
||
Completed |
NCT02944149 -
Safety of Minilaparotomy Provided by Trained Clinical Officers and Assistant Medical Officers: a Non-inferiority Trial
|
N/A |