Clinical Trials Logo

Status Asthmaticus clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Status Asthmaticus.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT03157102 Completed - Status Asthmaticus Clinical Trials

High Flow Nasal Cannula in Children With Status Asthmaticus

CANULASTHM
Start date: August 8, 2018
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

In France, over 2.5 million people suffer from asthma, including one-third of children. This is the chronic respiratory disease leading to the highest rate of hospitalization. The conventional oxygen delivery means in children are the non-rebreather face mask or low flow nasal cannula (standard oxygen therapy - SOT). New non-invasive ventilatory support systems such as High Flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC) are emerging. These are nasal cannulas allowing the delivery of a high air (or oxygen) flow, exceeding the inspiratory flow of patients with acute respiratory failure, allowing to deliver a slight positive expiratory pressure while ensuring humidification and warming of the airways. Aerosol administration is also possible with excellent efficiency and without interrupting respiratory assistance. Physiological data and clinical studies in other pathologies suggest the interest of this technique during the asthma attack, but no comparative study currently exists in this indication. The HFNCs could have their place upstream of Non Invasive Ventilation (NIV), thus replacing non-rebreather face mask sometimes not tolerated by the children. The investigators's hypothesis is that HFNCs could improve patients' health faster, reduce the use of other ventilatory assistance (NIV, invasive ventilation) and reduce the duration of hospitalization in intensive care units or continuous monitoring units (CMU).

NCT ID: NCT03029156 Completed - Asthma Exacerbation Clinical Trials

Effectiveness of the Aeroneb in Acute Severe Asthma

Start date: August 2015
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Background: The bronchodilator therapy is an essential component of the management of asthma exacerbation. The delivery of bronchodilators to the lungs in asthma exacerbations is usually achieved through nebulization (creating small particles to be inhaled). The commonly used nebulizer device is a small volume jet nebulizer which has not been consistently reliable in delivering bronchodilator therapy. The Aeroneb nebulizer device is a FDA approved device which produces consistently respirable sized particles which could potentially result in better bronchodilator effect than the standard jet nebulizer. Aim: To study whether the Aeroneb nebulizer is more effective than a small volume jet nebulizer in delivering bronchodilators during a severe asthma exacerbation. Experimental design: Patients will be randomized (like a flip of a coin) to receive bronchodilator therapy as per the emergency room protocol either via small volume jet nebulizer or Aeroneb nebulizer. Subjects: Adult patients between age of 18 and 55 years who present to the emergency room with severe asthma exacerbation with peak expiratory flow rate <50% of predicted. Study procedure: When enrolled in the study and after randomization, we will then collect data that is standard for the hospital like heart rate, blood pressure and breathing indices and also some non-routine things like some scoring scales for shortness of breath and serial measurements of peak expiratory flow rate. We anticipate that the Aeroneb device will be more effective in delivering bronchodilator medication and thus more effective in managing asthma exacerbations.

NCT ID: NCT02966184 Terminated - Status Asthmaticus Clinical Trials

Comparison of Albuterol for Status Asthmaticus

Start date: September 10, 2018
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

This study is designed to compare the length of continuous albuterol administration between two different albuterol formulations, BAC containing albuterol versus preservative free albuterol.

NCT ID: NCT02936778 Completed - Clinical trials for Childhood Asthma With Status Asthmaticus

Status Asthmaticus on the Intensive Care Prospective - STATIC PRO

Start date: August 2016
Phase:
Study type: Observational

This study will prospectively assess the impact and relevance of several risk factors for children with severe acute asthma (SAA) or acute wheeze that have been identified in retrospective studies. Secondary we will assess short-term medical and psychosocial functioning in patient (and parents) admitted to a PICU for SAA/acute wheeze versus a control group admitted to a MC for SAA/acute wheeze.

NCT ID: NCT02880930 Completed - Wheezing Clinical Trials

Optimizing Vitamin D Status in Children With Wheeze / Asthma (OPTIVIT)

OPTIVIT
Start date: December 2016
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Vitamin D deficiency is highly prevalent in the UK. Research shows that vitamin D enhances the immune system and may help protect against chest infections that can cause wheezing illness or worsen asthma symptoms. The Department of Health recommends a dose of 10 micrograms of vitamin D/day to prevent severe vitamin D deficiency in children. However, many studies have reported that this dose is not enough to raise plasma 25(OH)D concentration to the levels most likely to prevent against worsening of asthma symptoms. Such studies suggest that 25 micrograms of vitamin D/day. This dose is safe but its effects on vitamin D blood levels have not yet been specifically tested in children with asthma/wheeze. This study is designed to determine the optimal oral daily vitamin D supplementation dose to treat vitamin D deficiency in children with asthma or preschool wheeze. Over the 6-month course of the study, participants will meet with the study team four times in clinic or in their own home and will be contacted by telephone five times. Children will be asked to give a drop of blood via a fingerprick to test their vitamin D level and a sample of nasal epithelial lining fluid for measurement of inflammatory markers on three separate occasions.

NCT ID: NCT02872597 Completed - Status Asthmaticus Clinical Trials

Phase I, Placebo-Controlled, Blinded Pilot Study of Ipratropium in Children Admitted to the ICU With Status Asthmaticus

Start date: September 5, 2016
Phase: Phase 1
Study type: Interventional

This study is a Phase I study to investigate the addition of inhaled Ipratropium bromide to standard therapy in the treatment of severe asthma attacks in children admitted to the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit. Half of the subjects will receive inhaled Ipratropium, and half will receive an inhaled placebo.

NCT ID: NCT02780479 Terminated - Asthma Clinical Trials

Steroids in Children Hospitalized With Asthma

Start date: March 20, 2017
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

Asthma is the most common chronic disease of children. A short (3-5 day) course of a short-acting steroid such as Prednisone or Prednisolone has long been the standard of care for asthma exacerbation. Dexamethasone efficacy in asthma exacerbation has been studied in the outpatient setting and was found to be as effective as Prednisone. Dexamethasone has the advantage of shorter course, more compliance, and more tolerable. This has led many emergency departments to provide a 1-2 dose course of Dexamethasone on discharge. Thus, many inpatients have received a first dose of Dexamethasone prior to reaching the inpatient unit, leading to confusion about the best plan for these patients. Many hospitalist pediatricians continue to give a 5-day total course with Prednisone, but some patients have begun to receive a second dose of Dexamethasone 24 hours after the first dose. To our knowledge, no studies have been done to compare the efficacy of these two protocols in pediatric patients requiring hospitalization. The hypothesis is that a second dose of Dexamethasone is as effective as four additional days of Prednisone in hospitalized children with asthma exacerbation. This is an open label, randomized control study comparing these treatments in children age 2-18 hospitalized with asthma exacerbation who have received a first dose of Dexamethasone.

NCT ID: NCT02539420 Withdrawn - Status Asthmaticus Clinical Trials

A Prospective Trial of BiPAP Administration vs. Non-positive Pressure Therapy for Pediatric Status Asthmaticus

Start date: April 2016
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Though BiPAP is an increasingly common tool used by pediatric critical care physicians and there is promising data suggesting a role for BiPAP in the management of status asthmaticus, more information is needed to more definitively clarify the extent of its benefit, as well as when during an asthma exacerbation and in whom it is the most beneficial. In this study, which is among the first randomized studies of BiPAP use for status asthmaticus in the pediatric population, the investigators hope to better elucidate these issues to help guide clinicians' future management decisions.

NCT ID: NCT02347462 Withdrawn - Asthma Clinical Trials

Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure (BiPAP) for the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Acute Asthma Exacerbations

Start date: April 2015
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure (BiPAP) is increasingly being reported as an effective and safe method of respiratory support for children with severe asthma exacerbations unresponsive to standard therapies and with impending respiratory failure. Much of the evidence base supporting its use comes from retrospective observational studies, and there is currently a lack of data from randomized controlled trials to inform this practice. The investigators hypothesize that the use of BiPAP in children with moderate to severe asthma exacerbations could reduce the length of hospital stay, need for invasive ventilation, and use of intravenous bronchodilators. The investigators aim to test this hypothesis by randomizing children attending the Emergency Department with a moderate to severe clinical severity score refractory to inhaled bronchodilators to receive either BiPAP in addition to standard asthma care, or standard care alone.

NCT ID: NCT02345993 Active, not recruiting - Asthma Clinical Trials

Extra-fine Formoterol/Beclomethasone in Asthmatic Crisis

Start date: January 2015
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this study is to determine whether extra fine formoterol/beclomethasona are more effective in the treatment of asthmatic crisis when added to conventional treatment compared with conventional treatment alone.