Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT05861882
Other study ID # Gurbuz01
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase
First received
Last updated
Start date September 1, 2021
Est. completion date August 5, 2022

Study information

Verified date May 2023
Source Kirikkale University
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Observational

Clinical Trial Summary

''This study aims to determine the relationship between functional movement screen (FMS), core stabilization and Y balance test. The study will include evaluations on 30 handball players and 30 sedentary individuals.'' Functional movement analysis is a biomechanical screening and evaluation system to identify limitations and asymmetries in 7 basic movements. This system reveals the kinetic chain interaction between mobility and stability required for basic performance. Unlike conventional assessment methods, FHA focuses on the efficiency and quality of the movement pattern, not on the number of repetitions or weight lifted. The main aim of the study was to reveal the relationship between functional movement screen and core endurance and Y balance test evaluations in handball players with objective data. Functional movement is the general name of the activities performed by individuals for function and the movements performed by individuals for function are examined with analysis methods. In an effective analysis, if people do not have appropriate stability and mobility, it is determined from which muscle-muscle group or joint the problem originates. Analyses play a role in determining which of the stabilization, mobilization and flexibility factors are problematic at which stage of the function. In addition, these methods are effective in preventing possible injuries while helping to improve balance, strength and power characteristics of individuals. Core stabilization problems cause significant posture and stabilization problems. These problems are reflected in functional movements. Core stabilization problems are thought to have negative effects on functional movement analysis scores. Active athletes with this problem will be more affected. This study also aimed to observe the differences between athletes and sedentary individuals. Studies defined the core as the part of the body in the musculoskeletal system consisting of the proximal lower extremities, abdominal structures, hips, pelvis and spine and stated that the core muscles are composed of the trunk and pelvis muscles. It is argued that trunk and pelvis stabilization is essential for all movements of the extremities. The transversus abdominis and multifidus work in cocontraction and control excessive anterior pelvic tilt, which is known to be associated with femoral internal rotation and adduction. The musculature of the core is referred to as the muscular corset over the trunk and spine that stabilizes the body with or without limb movement. The strength and stabilization of the core affects the fitness and physical fitness of athletes. Core exercises should be included in exercise programs planned to improve athletic performance. Core endurance tests have been defined to reveal the relationship between core stabilization and performance. Lateral bridge test and trunk flexor test are the preferred core endurance tests in this study. The Y balance test is a dynamic test that requires strength, flexibility, core control and proprioception in a single-legged stance. Functional movement analysis, core stabilization tests and Y balance test are assessment scales that provide objective data on stabilization, postural alignment and spinal alignment. It is envisaged that these three assessment parameters will support each other after the study. Functional movements are widely used during both daily and sports activities. Core stabilization and dynamic balance are the factors that determine the quality of functional movements. These movements become more important for athletes as they affect their sporting success. Athletes need a good evaluation to ensure and maintain success. Since handball is defined as a sport that requires a lot of effort, the risks increase and it becomes clear that the evaluation should be done with a holistic approach.Injuries in handball develop due to multifactors.Biomechanical, kinesthetic and functional losses in players should be determined to prevent injuries.Functional movement analysis, core stabilization, Y balance test will give us detailed information about posture, limb alignment and asymmetry, spinal smoothness, dynamic balance and will give us the chance to analyze whether there is a correlation between these tests.


Description:

In this study, it will be questioned whether functional movement analysis can be considered as a part of core stabilization assessment in sedentary and athletes. The effects of dynamic balance on functional activity will be observed. It is aimed to evaluate the relationship between the test results and injury risks in the individuals participating in the study and what the most accurate exercises can be according to the evaluation parameters of the person to prevent injuries. This study includes the first evaluations of fms in a young age group. It will be a pilot study in the literature.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 60
Est. completion date August 5, 2022
Est. primary completion date July 15, 2022
Accepts healthy volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Gender Male
Age group 18 Years to 22 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - Being a licensed handball athlete - Not having undergone a surgical operation involving the musculoskeletal system in the last six months - Not having any obstacle to perform the tests to be performed within the study - Volunteering to participate in the study Exclusion Criteria: - Feeling any discomfort during the tests - Not wanting to continue working

Study Design


Intervention

Other:
functional movement screen
FMS consists of seven test component which are used to evaluate various main movement models.Individuals completed one by one deep squat, high stepping, single line lunge, shoulder mobility, straight leg raises, trunk stability push-ups, rotation stability which are component tests. Subcomponent tests assess asymmetry by measuring the individual bilaterally. Each component test was scored on an ordinal scale (0 to 3 points), with a maximum score of 3, based on the quality of the movement. Less than 3 points indicated that the individual performed some form of compensation or was unable to complete the entire movement.While individuals were doing these tests, they were recorded in the video , the final scoring was done by evaluating the images. The scores of the component tests were summed, resulting in a composite score between 0 and 21 points, with a maximum score of 21
survey application
Participants are evaluated with kasari physical activity survey. According to the FIT score, physical activity level is commented as sedentary between 0-20, poor between 21-40, normal between 41-60, good between 61-80 and perfect between 81-100
Y balance test
YBT, which is performed in the standing position on one leg , is dynamic a test. Participants stood on the footplate in the centre of the Y Balance Test area and then, it was given instruction them that they should maintain a single leg stance while reaching as far as possible with the opposite leg and return to the starting position on the centre platform without losing balance.In the test, individuals were asked to reach the maximum distance in 3 directions (anterior, posteromedial and posterolateral), allowing 3 trials for each leg. The maximum reach distance was recorded for each consecutive trial
Core stabilization assessment
The flexor muscle endurance test is initiated with the subject in a sitting position, with the back leaning against an apparatus angled 60 degrees from the floor. Both knees and hips are flexed to 90 degrees and the support apparatus is withdrawn and the time the person maintains the position is recorded The extensor muscle endurance test is performed with the upper trunk extended towards the end of the bed on which the test is performed and the pelvis, knees and hips fixed. The time the upper trunk maintains its level is recorded The lateral bridge test was performed with the individual lying in the full side bridge position (left and right side separately). Individuals supported themselves on one elbow and their feet while lifting their hips off the floor to form a straight line from head to toe. The test was terminated when the individual lost the straight back posture and/or their hips touched the floor.

Locations

Country Name City State
Turkey Süleyman Demirel University Isparta

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Kirikkale University

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Turkey, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary FUNCTIONAL MOVEMENT SCREEN FMS consists of seven test component which are used to evaluate various main movement models.Individuals completed one by one deep squat, high stepping, single line lunge, shoulder mobility, straight leg raises, trunk stability push-ups, rotation stability which are component tests. Subcomponent tests assess asymmetry by measuring the individual bilaterally. Each component test was scored on an ordinal scale (0 to 3 points), with a maximum score of 3, based on the quality of the movement. Less than 3 points indicated that the individual performed some form of compensation or was unable to complete the entire movement.While individuals were doing these tests, they were recorded in the video , the final scoring was done by evaluating the images. The scores of the component tests were summed, resulting in a composite score between 0 and 21 points, with a maximum score of 21 1 day
Secondary Y BALANCE TEST YBT, which is performed in the standing position on one leg , is dynamic a test. Participants stood on the footplate in the centre of the Y Balance Test area and then, it was given instruction them that they should maintain a single leg stance while reaching as far as possible with the opposite leg and return to the starting position on the centre platform without losing balance.In the test, individuals were asked to reach the maximum distance in 3 directions (anterior, posteromedial and posterolateral), allowing 3 trials for each leg. The maximum reach distance was recorded for each consecutive trial 1 day
Secondary CORE STABILIZATION ASSESMENT The flexor muscle endurance test is initiated with the subject in a sitting position, with the back leaning against an apparatus angled 60 degrees from the floor. Both knees and hips are flexed to 90 degrees and the support apparatus is withdrawn and the time the person maintains the position is recorded.
The extensor muscle endurance test is performed with the upper trunk extended towards the end of the bed on which the test is performed and the pelvis, knees and hips fixed. The time the upper trunk maintains its level is recorded.
The lateral bridge test was performed with the individual lying in the full side bridge position (left and right side separately). Individuals supported themselves on one elbow and their feet while lifting their hips off the floor to form a straight line from head to toe. The test was terminated when the individual lost the straight back posture and/or their hips touched the floor.
1 day
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT05243134 - The Influence of Anatomic Deformities on the Clinical Efficacy in the Patients With Patellar Dislocation
Terminated NCT04586179 - A Comparison Between Cardiovascular Exercise Modes Following Sport Related Concussion N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT04418063 - Glenohumeral Internal Rotation Deficit in Non-pitcher Overhead Athletic Athletes: Case Series Analysis of Athletes
Not yet recruiting NCT05317130 - A Complex Health Promotion Intervention in Parasport - The Safe & Healthy Parasport Project
Completed NCT04780906 - Influence of Wrist Taping on Handgrip Strength in Crossfit Athletes N/A
Completed NCT05247359 - Neuromuscular Deficits in Jump-Landing Technique in Young Basketball
Completed NCT05254470 - Real-World Experience of Patients Treated for Musculoskeletal Injuries With SAM in Routine Care
Completed NCT04641520 - Shoulder Profile Among Swimmers and Badminton Players
Enrolling by invitation NCT03312504 - Implementing a School Prevention Program to Reduce Injuries Through Neuromuscular Training N/A
Recruiting NCT04121780 - Growth Hormone Replacement Therapy for Retried Professional Football Players Phase 2
Completed NCT04730167 - The Monaco Initiative for Concussion in Motorsport Pilots
Completed NCT03310450 - Tour de Borobudur Troponin Study on Predictors and Synergistic Role of MDA and Hs-CRP Levels
Completed NCT04637607 - Immediate Effect of Non-invasive Auricular Acupoint Stimulation for the Performance and the Meridian Activities of Archery Athletes N/A
Completed NCT04284358 - Does Peer to Peer Learning Facilitated by an iPad Application Help Coaches Learn a Neuromuscular Training Warmup? N/A
Completed NCT04589780 - Is There a Relationship Between the Risk of Injury and Posture in Wrestlers?
Completed NCT05827484 - The Effect of Combined Use of Anti-fibrotic Agent With Platelet Rich Plasma on Skeletal Muscle Healing After Acute Injuries Phase 4
Recruiting NCT05326555 - Dynamic Vision Testing and Concussion Management Dream Team 65
Completed NCT04504929 - The Effectiveness of Dynamic Taping in Preventing Muscle Fatigue N/A
Completed NCT04181242 - Epidemiology of Injuries in Elite Badminton Players: a Prospective Study
Completed NCT04177537 - Real-World Experience of Athletes Treated With SAM