Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Summary

Instrumented lumbar fusion surgery is often accompanied by interbody fusion using an autologous bone graft that is supposed to expand and remodel to achieve a rigid and lasting bony construction between two vertebrae. However, there is a dearth of knowledge regarding the process of biological remodelling of intercorporal bone grafts. Also, a valid and reliable assessment of fusion status remains challenging because there is no objective tool available to quantify the bone remodelling process. CT-based Hounsfield Units correlate with Bone Mineral Density and can be used as a proxy to establish trajectories over time to assess changes in bone mineral density from the bone graft.


Clinical Trial Description

Instrumented lumbar spinal fusion is a surgical procedure that is widely being used to treat various spinal diseases such as deformities, spondylolisthesis, spondylolysis, spinal instability, and degenerative disc disease. Lumbar fusion is an effective treatment to stabilize the degenerative segments and promote bony fusion and is often combined with subsequent decompression of neural structures or correction of deformities. To date, various surgical fusion techniques are used, but consensus regarding a superior technique is lacking. Also, the location where a surgeon wants to achieve bony fusion varies. Interbody fusion is performed to fuse the upper endplate of one vertebra and the lower endplate of the adjacent vertebra. An intervertebral cage is often used to retain intervertebral height and stability. After insertion of the cage, autologous decompressive bone is impacted behind the cage. Over time, this non-vital bone graft is expected to remodel towards new vital bone and subsequently to create a sustainable fusion between two adjacent lumbar vertebral bodies. However, in case of resorption of the bone graft or adequate bone remodeling, solid bridging of bone may fail to develop and this may result in a pseudarthrosis or non-union. This clinically important complication occurs in 5% to 35% of patients treated with spinal fusion and can lead to pain and a decrease in functional status. Also, subsequent revision surgery for symptomatic pseudarthrosis occurs in up to 24% of patients after fusion surgery. The gold standard to assess interbody fusion is surgical exploration, but due to unpractical and ethical considerations, monitoring fusion status is mainly limited to radiographic image evaluation. CT-scanning is the most established radiographic method option for this, but when a patient improves clinically, conventional radiographs are used more commonly. An orthopaedic surgeon can use several existing scoring criteria to judge the degree of solid bony bridging based on this radiographic imaging. However, research has shown that the inter-observer agreement and diagnostic accuracy of these scoring criteria is relatively low. Correct diagnosis of lumbar fusion on CT has been reported to be as low as 67-72% and at the cervical level non-unions are missed in 20% of the cases. The problem is that, to date, there is no quantitative and objective tool available to quantify the bone remodeling process and to precisely judge whether vertebrae have fused or not. In fact, there is an overall dearth of knowledge about the biological process of ongoing spinal fusion and its association with the development of back and/or leg pain. In vivo bone remodeling can be monitored by using repeated Bone Mineral Density (BMD) measurements. BMD values are traditionally generated using two-dimensional dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scans which are hindered by overprojection from the iliac crest and metal artefacts. A more suitable proxy for these measurements is the use of Hounsfield Units (HU). HU can be measured on CT-images and highly correlate with BMD. HU have already been used to determine vertebral bone quality after spine surgery and have several clinical applications, including the ability to predict the stability of orthopaedic implants and to assist in surgical decision-making. However, none of these studies have succeeded in improving diagnostic accuracy in establishing spinal fusion. Quantifying the biological bone remodeling process in the bone graft over time can help to evaluate bone growth or bone resorption. Knowledge of changes in bone mineral density from the bone graft could be very useful supplementary information when doubts about fusion status exist. To date, only two feasibility studies with relatively small sample sizes have reported on the value of HU measurements to evaluate bone graft remodeling after lumbar interbody fusion surgery. In one previous cross-sectional study from Spruit et al., published almost 18 years ago, HU measurements were only performed once in the first year after spinal fusion surgery. As such, no information with regards to the evolution of bone graft HU over time were obtained. Recently the feasibility of HU measurements after lumbar spondylodesis (Reijmer et al, submitted) was explored. The HU measurement procedure that was developed during this study had excellent intraobserver reliability. The individual HU trajectories also suggested bone remodeling was not yet completed between one and two years after surgery. However, limitations of the study were a small sample size, the absence of postoperative CT-images made shortly after surgery and the absence of information about the participants' postoperative back and leg pain. This limited insight into the progression of pain and the process of bone graft remodeling in the first year after surgery. This study will build upon the results of the former study in an effort to further the state of the art in this important field of orthopaedics. ;


Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


NCT number NCT05565456
Study type Observational
Source Rijnstate Hospital
Contact Joey FH Reijmer, Drs.
Phone 088 - 005 7744
Email JReijmer@rijnstate.nl
Status Recruiting
Phase
Start date December 2, 2022
Completion date November 2025

See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT03883022 - Vancomycin Powder Combined With Autogenous Bone Graft as a Prevention for Post-operative Infection for Spine Surgery N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT04542577 - PMCF Study on the Safety and Performance of PROSPACE 3D / PROSPACE 3D OBLIQUE / TSPACE 3D
Recruiting NCT04477447 - PMCF Study on the Safety and Performance of CESPACE 3D
Completed NCT02558621 - New Robotic Assistance System for Spinal Fusion Surgery N/A
Terminated NCT01461005 - A Postmarket Surveillance Study of the Paradigm Spine Dynamic Stabilization System (DSS) N/A
Completed NCT00405691 - Safety and Effectiveness Study of the TOPS System, a Total Posterior Arthroplasty Implant Designed to Alleviate Pain Resulting From Moderate to Severe Lumbar Stenosis Phase 3
Completed NCT00205101 - Clinical Outcome Study of the Triad Allograft for Posterior Lumbar Fusion
Enrolling by invitation NCT04204135 - The Course of Hip Flexion Weakness Following LLIF or ALIF
Recruiting NCT05238740 - Comparison of Standalone Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (ALIF) L5/S1 Performed With Either rhBMP-2 or ViviGen® N/A
Completed NCT02931279 - PASS OCT® Post-market Clinical Follow-up
Completed NCT02966639 - Validation of Appropriateness Criteria for the Surgical Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis
Not yet recruiting NCT02805985 - Post-market Surveillance Study of FLXfit™ TLIF Interbody Fusion Device N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT02057744 - MIS ReFRESH: Robotic vs. Freehand Minimally Invasive Spinal Surgeries
Completed NCT01711203 - The Addition of a Pilates Program for Short-Term Improvements in Patients With Spondylolysis or Spondylolisthesis N/A
Completed NCT00549913 - Study of 3 Doses of NeoFuse Combined With MasterGraft Granules in Subjects Requiring Posterolateral Lumbar Fusion (PLF) Phase 1/Phase 2
Terminated NCT00254852 - Evaluation of Radiographic and Patient Outcomes Following Lumbar Spine Fusion Using Demineralized Bone Matrix (DBM) Mixed With Autograft N/A
Terminated NCT00095095 - Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using the Telamon® Peek™ Versus the Telamon® Hydrosorb™ Fusion Device Phase 4
Active, not recruiting NCT03956537 - PMCF Neo Pedicle Screw and Cage Systems
Recruiting NCT05182489 - Adaptix RCT Evaluating Adaptix™ Versus PEEK Cages N/A
Completed NCT02884440 - Transverse Abdominis Plane Block for Anterior Approach Spine Surgery Phase 2