Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Unknown status

Administrative data

NCT number NCT01342588
Other study ID # ABC-11-03
Secondary ID
Status Unknown status
Phase N/A
First received April 20, 2011
Last updated April 26, 2011
Start date January 2011
Est. completion date May 2012

Study information

Verified date April 2011
Source American British Cowdray Medical Center
Contact Ernesto E Galvan Hernandez, MD, MsC
Phone 52 (55) 16647205
Email egalh@yahoo.com
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The purpose of this study is to establish the accuracy of pedicle positioning using continuous electrical pulse during screwing. Additionally, the investigators evaluate if this maneuver can prevent neurological injury during track creation and screwing in lumbar and thoracic spine instrumentation surgery


Description:

Pedicle screw instrumentation as part of spine surgery is a recurrent technique used for most of spine surgeons. Since its description by Boucher in 1959 and its popularization later by Roy-Camille, has been considered a technique that demands great anatomy knowledge and some grade of expertise. Even in experienced hands the misplacement of pedicle screws could have an incidence of 10-40% (average of 20%). Medially misplacements during track creation and screw insertion are the most feared complications, because the anatomic relationship between medial pedicle wall and neural structures. The first attempt to use continuous electrical stimulation during pedicle track creation and screw insertion was communicated in 1997 by Welch WC, et al. In that study they used the bone impedance as a direct measurement of pedicle wall integrity; unfortunately they used inhaled anesthetics and assessed the final screw position with plain X-rays. They reported a sensibility and specificity of 98% and 99% respectively. The great limitation for this study is its assessment of screw accuracy performed by plain X-rays, now a days the best way to do it is with computed tomography (CT).

After the Welch report, a couple of studies more have used similar techniques in the thoracic spine trying to avoid neurological injuries during pedicle screw insertion, but none described the use of continuous train pulses during screwing.

The present study pretends to evaluate the final accuracy and trans-operative usefulness of the pulse train stimulation during track creation and screw insertion using intra venous anesthetic agents and CT scans to assess the integrity of pedicle walls


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Unknown status
Enrollment 60
Est. completion date May 2012
Est. primary completion date April 2012
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years to 70 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- Any patient who needs pedicle screw placement for any spine condition

Exclusion Criteria:

- Previous spine surgery

- Pedicle fracture documented before or during surgery.

- Preoperative identified neurological deficit of the nerve roots close to the instrumented levels

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Procedure:
Electric pulse train stimulation
Electric pulse train stimulation of regular probes and screw drivers used in track creation and screw placement Using a standard neurophysiological work station, a series of square wave pulses will be delivered through standard probes and screw drivers using an alligator clip during pedicle probing and screw insertion (4 Hz for 50-200 µsec at 10-30 µAmp)

Locations

Country Name City State
Mexico American British Cowdray Medical Center Mexico City Mexico DF

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
American British Cowdray Medical Center

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Mexico, 

References & Publications (4)

Collado-Corona MA, de Leo-Vargas R, Sandoval-Sánchez V, Díaz-Hernández A, Gutiérrez-Sougarret BJ, Shkurovich-Bialik P. Neurophysiological monitoring in spinal cord surgery. Cir Cir. 2009 Sep-Oct;77(5):385-90. — View Citation

Donohue ML, Murtagh-Schaffer C, Basta J, Moquin RR, Bashir A, Calancie B. Pulse-train stimulation for detecting medial malpositioning of thoracic pedicle screws. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 May 20;33(12):E378-85. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31817343c1. — View Citation

Roy-Camille R, Saillant G, Mazel C. Internal fixation of the lumbar spine with pedicle screw plating. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1986 Feb;(203):7-17. — View Citation

Welch WC, Rose RD, Balzer JR, Jacobs GB. Evaluation with evoked and spontaneous electromyography during lumbar instrumentation: a prospective study. J Neurosurg. 1997 Sep;87(3):397-402. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Intra operative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) alert - Continuous electrical stimulation delivered by a wire connected to the surgical instruments only during pedicle track creation and screw placement combined with neurophysiological monitoring will let us identify any IONM alert, defined as nerve irritation or a decrease in voltage and/or amplitude response. This is a single and immediate measurement obtained at surgery during spinal screw placement. Participants will be followed for the duration of surgical procedure, an expected average of 3-4 hours
Secondary Pedicle screw accuracy On day 2 post surgery, a CT scan with sagittal, coronal and axial reconstructions will be obtained . The same day of the study, two independent observers will assess the accuracy of screws inside lumbar pedicles, recording in millimeters, any pedicle wall violation on sagittal, axial and coronal views for each screw placed. In that way we could have the accuracy of pedicle screws placed with the proposed technique, before patient discharge. On day 2 after surgery before patient discharge, a CT scan will be performed