Clinical Trials Logo

Spinal Stenosis clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Spinal Stenosis.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT04207606 Completed - Clinical trials for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

Post Epidural Steroid Injection Follow-up

Start date: January 3, 2020
Phase:
Study type: Observational

To determine the expected pain response timeline for patients receiving epidural steroid injections, our team plans to assess patient pain severity and degree of pain relief every 3 days for 23 days.

NCT ID: NCT04204720 Completed - Clinical trials for Spinal Stenosis Lumbar

A Comparison of Intravascular Injection With Chiba Needle and Whitacre Needle

Start date: April 1, 2018
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Caudal epidural injection (CEI) is effective for spinal pain. However, intravascular injection may occur during CEI, which can lead to hematoma, neurologic deficit and local anesthetics systemic toxicity. Whitacre type needle has been reported to be effective for reducing intravascular injection during transforaminal epidural injection. In this study, we compared the Chiba needle and Whitacre needle on incidence of intravascular injection during CEI.

NCT ID: NCT04193488 Completed - Postoperative Pain Clinical Trials

Mid-Transverse Process to Pleural (MTP) Block and Erector Spinal Plan (ESP) Block in Spinal Surgery

Start date: October 23, 2019
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Ethics committee approval was taken on October 22, 2019, numbered 19/342. 120 adult patients who will undergo spine stabilization surgery between October 2019 and January 2020 in "Gülhane Training and Research Hospital" were planned to be included in the study. Patients will be randomized to 30 patients with MTP block (Group MTP) and ESP block (Group ESP) and no block (Group K) in addition to patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). Postoperative pain scores, analgesic use, number of PCA button presses, total amount of opioid administered and complications due to opioids will be recorded. The obtained data will be compared statistically.

NCT ID: NCT04192591 Recruiting - Clinical trials for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

A 5-year Superion™ IDS Clinical Outcomes Post-Approval Evaluation (SCOPE)

Start date: January 30, 2020
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

To compile real-world outcomes of the Superion™ IDS in routine clinical practice.

NCT ID: NCT04189341 Withdrawn - Clinical trials for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

Modified-Thoracolumbar Interfascial Plane Block and Erector Spinae Plane Block Following Lumbar Instrumentation Surgery

Start date: January 10, 2020
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Ultrasound (US)-guided peripheral nerve blocks have been used increasily due to the advantages of ultrasound in anesthesia practice. TLIP block is one of these nerve blocks performed under US guidance. In this technique, local anesthetic solution is injected between the multifidus and logissimus muscles nearly at the level of the 3rd lumbar vertebra and targets the dorsal rami of the thoracolumbar nerves. However, the visualisation of this technique may be difficult under US guidance. Therefore, modified-TLIP (mTLIP) block was defined as a new approach. It has been reported that mTLIP block may provide effective analgesia management after lumbar spine surgery. The ultrasound (US) guided erector spina plane block (ESPB) is a novel interfacial plan block defined by Forero et al. at 2016. Visualization of sonoanatomy with US is easy, and the spread of local anesthesic agents can be easily seen under the erector spinae muscle. Thus, analgesia occurs in several dermatomes with cephalad-caudad way. It has been reported that ESPB provides lumbar analgesia at T10-12, L3. The aim of this study is to compare US-guided mTLIP block and ESPB pain management after multi-level lumbar spinal instrumentation surgery.

NCT ID: NCT04176562 Recruiting - Clinical trials for Musculoskeletal Diseases

Prospective SPINE Registry

SPINE
Start date: January 28, 2020
Phase:
Study type: Observational [Patient Registry]

This study is a prospective, multi-center, open label registry designed to collect real-world data on performance and safety data on RTI's spine products.

NCT ID: NCT04171544 Completed - Spinal Disease Clinical Trials

Streamline Occipito-Cervico-Thoracic System Post-Market Clinical Follow-up

OCT PMCF
Start date: August 6, 2019
Phase:
Study type: Observational

This is a multi-center, post-market, retrospective study design to collect safety and performance data for patients implanted with the Streamline OCT System.

NCT ID: NCT04166981 Completed - Spinal Stenosis Clinical Trials

Instr. vs. Non-instr. Posterolateral Spinal Fusion in Patients With Spinal Stenosis and Degenerative Listhesis

Start date: January 1, 2017
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The aim of this study is to determine, in patients with grade 1 degenerative spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis, if decompression and lumbar spinal fusion with, or without supplementary pedicle screw fixation yields an improved patient reported outcome.

NCT ID: NCT04124146 Not yet recruiting - Clinical trials for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

Long-term Evolution of Patients Suffering From Lumbar Canal Stenosis and Supported by Minimally Invasive Surgery: SUIVISTENO

SUIVISTENO
Start date: December 1, 2019
Phase:
Study type: Observational

describe the functional evolution of patients at more than 10 years post intervention. describe the evolution of pain, satisfaction, quality of life of patients to more than 5 years pot intervention.

NCT ID: NCT04094220 Completed - Clinical trials for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

LLIF Plus Posterior Decompression for Severe Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

Start date: August 1, 2019
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF), as a minimally invasive technique, is an indirect decompression technique, and its decompression effect is not as thorough as traditional posterior decompression surgery. For certain patients with severe lumbar stenosis, additional posterior decompression is required. However, whether additional posterior decompression is necessary for these patients is unknown. Radiographic predictors of failed indirect decompression via LLIF is unknown. In current randomized, controlled trial , the investigators compare the clinical outcomes of patients with severe lumbar stenosis who received LLIF plus posterior decompression and those without posterior decompression.