Clinical Trials Logo

Spinal Stenosis clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Spinal Stenosis.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT03072927 Recruiting - Clinical trials for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

MILD® Percutaneous Image-Guided Lumbar Decompression: A Medicare Claims Study

Start date: March 10, 2017
Phase:
Study type: Observational

This prospective longitudinal study will compare incidence rates of Medicare beneficiary surgical and minimally invasive intervention post index procedure, as well as harms associated with the MILD procedure, at 24 months post-treatment with MILD, tested against a control group of similar patients that have had a comparable procedure. This study will start with patients treated with a study procedure having an index date on or after January 1, 2017, and enrollment will continue until stopped by the sponsor.

NCT ID: NCT03064802 Recruiting - Clinical trials for Degenerative Disc Disease

Burst Biologics Spinal Fusion Registry

Start date: March 24, 2017
Phase:
Study type: Observational [Patient Registry]

A multicenter patient registry was created with aim of documenting how spine and neurosurgeons are utilizing Burst Biologics products along with patient outcomes. These include radiographic measures such as fusion outcome, instrumentation integrity, and clinical outcomes (symptom and function improvement) based on surgeon and patient based outcome assessments.

NCT ID: NCT02875431 Recruiting - Clinical trials for Cervical Disc Herniation

Multicentric Registry for the Detection of C5 Palsy After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion

C5registry
Start date: August 2016
Phase: N/A
Study type: Observational [Patient Registry]

Detect the reason for the frequently occurring C5 palsy after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion

NCT ID: NCT02597244 Recruiting - Spinal Stenosis Clinical Trials

Effectiveness of Percutaneous Foraminotomy

Start date: June 2014
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Percutaneous Extraforaminotomy using BS extraforamonotomy kit(BioSpine Co.,Ltd, Seoul, South Korea), was performed in patients who did not show improvement lasting more than 1 month after diagnostic conventional fluoroscopically guided transforaminal epidural block with local anesthetic and steroid. Numeric rating scale(NRS) pain score, Oswestry disability index (ODI), Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RDQ), claudication distance(CD) was checked before and after the procedure.

NCT ID: NCT02555280 Recruiting - Clinical trials for Spinal Stenosis Lumbar

Coflex PS3 Actual Conditions for Use Study

PAS003
Start date: September 9, 2019
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

A 2 and 5 year evaluation of clinical outcomes in the treatment of degenerative spinal stenosis with concomitant low back pain by decompression with additional stabilization using the coflex® Interlaminar Technology for FDA Actual Conditions of Use Study.

NCT ID: NCT02380456 Recruiting - Spinal Stenosis Clinical Trials

dHACM in Lumbar Decompression and Microdiscectomy Surgery

Start date: November 2014
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The present study investigates the product dHACM, which is unique in that it utilizes an amniotic membrane that has anti-scarring and anti-keloid formation properties. dHACM also contains growth factors that promote healing. The growth factors present in dHACM are Epidermal Growth Factor (EGF), Transforming Growth Factor Beta (TGF-β), Fibroblast Growth Factor (FGF), and Platelet Derived Growth Factors (PDGF) A&B. These growth factors may play a role in diminishing EF and have a positive effect on patient treatment outcomes.

NCT ID: NCT02257723 Recruiting - Low Back Pain Clinical Trials

The Effect of Integrated CAM Treatment in Hospitalized Patients

Start date: January 2012
Phase:
Study type: Observational

This study investigates the effect of hospital-based intensive non-surgical treatment in musculoskeletal patients admitted to an integrated hospital that offers both complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) and conventional medicine treatment.

NCT ID: NCT01988259 Recruiting - Clinical trials for Single Brachial Radiculopathy

Head-neck Coordination Analysis After Minimally Invasive Surgery in the Dorsal Cervical Spine

MISDCS
Start date: September 2013
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

To proof patients' benefit of minimally invasive surgery in the dorsal cervical spine an apparatus to examine head-neck-coordination was constructed. Two different surgical techniques will be compared: Laminoplasty: open approach vs minimally invasive surgery (MIS)-approach; Foraminotomy: open approach vs MIS-approach. Each patient will be tested before surgery, postoperative as well as 3 and 12 month follow-up. Hypothesis is that patients after MIS-approaches perform better in their head-neck-coordination as patients with open approaches.

NCT ID: NCT01933607 Recruiting - Spinal Stenosis Clinical Trials

TOPS™ System Post Marketing Study To Evaluate The Safety And Effectiveness Of TOPS™ System

Start date: May 2014
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

This Single-Arm Post-Marketing Evaluation will gauge the improvement in function and pain for lumbar spinal stenosis and spondylolisthesis patients with the TOPS System.

NCT ID: NCT01921530 Recruiting - Spinal Stenosis Clinical Trials

Interbody vs Instrumented Posterolateral Fusion Following Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis With Degenerative Spondylolisthesis

Start date: December 2013
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

Degenerative spondylolisthesis describes the slip of one spinal segment relative to the adjacent segment. It is usually associated with spinal stenosis (which limits one's ability to walk and stand) and is the most common indication for surgery in adults over age 65 years. A variety of surgical techniques are available; the most common are the Posterolateral Instrumented Fusion (PLF), and Interbody Fusion (IF) including Posterolateral Interbody Fusion (PLIF), and Transforaminal Interbody fusion (TLIF). IF uses a cage that is placed within the cleaned out disc space between the vertebral bodies being fused. Although this approach achieves a good fusion rate and deformity correction it is associated with a higher surgical cost and potential intra-operative complication rate. What is more, no consensus exists as to whether IF provides better patient rated functional outcome and quality of life. If the advantages of IF do not translate into superior patient rated outcomes, then the risk-benefit ratio would be tipped in favor of PLF. The purpose of this study is to determine if IF is equivalent to PLF for the treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis. The investigators will conduct a prospective randomized control trial comparing these two procedures. Our primary outcome measure will be the Oswestry Disability Index, which evaluates spinal pain and function.