Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Completed
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT03318692 |
Other study ID # |
MySpine clinical |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Completed |
Phase |
N/A
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
June 23, 2017 |
Est. completion date |
March 31, 2024 |
Study information
Verified date |
May 2024 |
Source |
Balgrist University Hospital |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
The clinically already tested and approved MySpine system is compared to the free-hand dorsal
instrumentation, which is the gold standard in spondylodesis surgery. The aim of this study
is to investigate whether or not the pedicle screw can be inserted anatomically more
accurately by the MySpine system than by the conventional free-hand method using
intraoperative fluoroscopy.
Description:
Patients with an indication for spondylodesis are included according to the inclusion
criteria and exclusion criteria. Subsequently, randomization into the MySpine and
conventional group is performed. Patients remain blinded to the randomization.
On the basis of a computed tomography, the surgeon plans the entry points, the screw size and
length, as well as the angle of the screws in two planes (sagittal and axial) on the
computer. In the MySpine group, a three-dimensional, digital reconstruction of the spine is
made using Medacta International SA software. On the basis of these planning files,
three-dimensional templates with guide channels (guides) are produced for each individual
vertebra. These guides can be applied dorsally to the bony anatomy and thus specify the entry
points as well as the direction of the screw. Also, replicas of the individual vertebra are
produced in the 3D printer.
The patients are operated in a prone position via a dorsal approach. After preparation of the
dorsal process, vertebral arches and vertebral joints as well as the transverse process, the
screws are implanted with one of the following methods depending on the randomization:
1. Freehand (fluoroscopically controlled)
2. MySpine System
Postoperatively, all patients undergo computed tomography of the operated area. On the basis
of this computed tomography the number of pedicle perforations as well as their extent should
be determined according to the simplified Laine classification. These results are to be
statistically evaluated with the question of whether there are significant differences
between the two techniques with respect to the absolute and individual number of pedicle
perforations, as well as their extent. It is also to be examined whether these results show a
dependence on the level of experience of the surgeon.
In addition to the individual radiation exposure (cumulative irradiation time in seconds and
irradiation dose in cGy), the time for the dorsal instrumentation for each of the two systems
per surgeon is also to be measured and evaluated.
In the follow-up, the outcome is also recorded by means of pain registration, ODI score and
complication detection (infections, pedicle fractures, implant loosening, pseudoarthrosis,
re-operations).
The follow-up assessments 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years after surgrey are peformed
according to institutional standards.