Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Completed
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT04498351 |
Other study ID # |
N-19-2020 |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Completed |
Phase |
Early Phase 1
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
June 30, 2020 |
Est. completion date |
October 22, 2021 |
Study information
Verified date |
March 2022 |
Source |
Cairo University |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
Using the spermatic cord block has been of great advantage, as it has been cost saving,
efficient technique whether used inon its own or combination with a sedative or .
Furthermore, it provides minimal cardiac risks, early case ambulation, satisfactory
postoperative pain control, as well as a reduced hospital stay and cost. one of the major
drawbacks of spermatic cord block is being a single injection technique, leading to a short
postoperative analgesia duration. So, to overcome this flaw some adjuvants were proven to
prolong the analgesia duration as Dexmetedomidine (Dex), and magnesium.
Description:
The technique of the spermatic cord block was first described in the 1960s by Earle AS.Using
the spermatic cord block has been of great advantage, as it has been cost saving, efficient
technique whether used inon its own or combination with a sedative or . Furthermore, it
provides minimal cardiac risks, early case ambulation, satisfactory postoperative pain
control, as well as a reduced hospital stay and cost. one of the major drawbacks of spermatic
cord block is being a single injection technique, leading to a short postoperative analgesia
duration. So, to overcome this flaw some adjuvants were proven to prolong the analgesia
duration as Dexmetedomidine (Dex), and magnesium.