Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) Treatment of Post-Stroke Spasticity

Spasticity Clinical Trial

Official title:

Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) Treatment of Post-Stroke Spasticity

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT02268461
• Other study ID #: 1408M53261
• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: December 2014
• Est. completion date: December 2016

Study information

• Verified date: August 2022
• Source: University of Minnesota
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Spasticity is a common complication of stroke affecting quality of life. Spasticity involves exaggerated stretch reflexes that create stiffness in muscles with associated loss of motion and functional control. Traditional treatments involve range of motion, medications, and sometimes surgery. Each of these has its own limitations, which has invited exploration of alternative modes of treatment. One such treatment with the potential to benefit spasticity is repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS). The purpose of this study is to determine whether patients with upper limb spasticity as a consequence of a chronic stroke can benefit from stimulation of the non-affected hemisphere of the brain with low-frequency (inhibitory) repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS), potentially leading to a reduction of spasticity and clinical improvement in upper limb function.

Description:

The purpose of this pilot study is to evaluate the efficacy of rTMS versus placebo for spasticity reduction in a cross-over design in 6 people with stroke. Our research question is: In patients with upper extremity spasticity as a consequence of chronic stroke, does stimulation of the contralesional motor cortex with low-frequency (inhibitory) rTMS lead to reduction of spasticity and thereby clinical improvement in upper extremity function? Our rationale is that the pathophysiology of post-stroke spasticity is primarily driven by ensuant cortical derangement, and further, that this derangement can be mitigated to a clinically meaningful extent by proper utilization of rTMS directed at these foci. Optimized rTMS treatment protocols may even achieve efficacy that surpasses current mainstays of spasticity management. Patients will be randomly assigned to receive either rTMS or placebo during their first treatment arm and then cross-over to receive the opposite treatment at the second treatment arm. A washout period of one month will occur between treatment arms. Each treatment arm will consist of 3 daily treatment sessions. Participants will present on a Monday for the pre-test assessment, Tuesday-Thursday for the treatment sessions and Friday for the post-test assessment. One treatment session will consist of 600 pulses of 1Hertz rTMS at an intensity of 90% of resting motor threshold (duration 10 minutes) applied to the primary motor area of the contralesional hemisphere. Sham rTMS intensity will be 0% but with a similar sound and scalp sensation. Assessments will be made at each session, and will be conducted at pre-test, post-test, and one-month follow-up. The one month follow-up test will serve as the pretest for the next treatment arm. That is, after follow-up, patients will cross-over to receive the opposite treatment in the same format. Safety has already been demonstrated for our protocol. Data will be analyzed with methods appropriate to a single-subject crossover design (visual analysis, confidence intervals and 2-Standard Deviation bandwidth). The primary outcome that we will measure is reduction of spasticity at the fingers and wrist. A secondary outcome of interest is functional improvement of the spastic upper limb.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 4
• Est. completion date: December 2016
• Est. primary completion date: October 2016
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

1. first-time stroke

2. stroke at least six months prior to onset of study with chronic sequela of spasticity

3. stroke location- either cortical or subcortical

4. stroke type- either hemorrhagic or ischemic

5. stroke hemisphere- either left or right, dominant or non- dominant hemisphere

6. 18 years of age or older

7. gender- either male or female

8. ability to follow three-step directions

9. demonstration of 10 degrees of active extension at the metacarpophalangeal joint and wrist of the paretic upper extremity

10. demonstration of consistent resting motor evoked potential from ipsilesional and contralesional hemispheres

11. sufficient ambulation or wheelchair mobility to allow subject to present to treatment and testing areas with minimum assist

Exclusion Criteria:

1. history of seizure within the past two years

2. inability to follow three-step directions

3. anosognosia

4. moderate to severe receptive aphasia

5. inability to give informed consent

6. premorbid spasticity or neurologic impairment prior to stroke

7. co-morbidities impairing upper extremity function such as fracture or deformity

8. indwelling metal or medical devices incompatible with TMS

9. pregnancy

10. bi-hemispheric or multifocal stroke

11. dementia

12. neurolytic injection within the 3 months prior to onset of study or planned neurolytic injection during study period

13. planned vacation or travel during study period

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Muscle Spasticity
• Spasticity

Intervention

Device:
• repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS)
The treatment arm will consist of 3 daily treatment sessions. One treatment session in this study with real rTMS will consist of 600 pulses of 1Hertz rTMS at an intensity of 90% of resting motor threshold (duration 10 minutes) applied to the primary motor area of the contralesional hemisphere.
• Sham repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Sham rTMS utilizes a coil that produces identical noise and tactile sensation to the real coil, but does not emit a magnetic field (0% intensity). Duration and frequency of auditory and tactile stimulation will be identical to the real intervention.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
United States	University of Minnesota, Clinical and Translational Science Institute	Minneapolis	Minnesota

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
University of Minnesota

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

References & Publications (24)

Braddom, Randall L., Ralph M. Buschbacher. Ch 30 Spasticity Management. Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation. Saunders Elsevier 2007; 641-55.

Burn J, Dennis M, Bamford J, Sandercock P, Wade D, Warlow C. Epileptic seizures after a first stroke: the Oxfordshire Community Stroke Project. BMJ. 1997 Dec 13;315(7122):1582-7. — View Citation

Carey JR, Evans CD, Anderson DC, Bhatt E, Nagpal A, Kimberley TJ, Pascual-Leone A. Safety of 6-Hz primed low-frequency rTMS in stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008 Mar-Apr;22(2):185-92. Epub 2007 Sep 17. — View Citation

Carey JR, Kimberley TJ, Lewis SM, Auerbach EJ, Dorsey L, Rundquist P, Ugurbil K. Analysis of fMRI and finger tracking training in subjects with chronic stroke. Brain. 2002 Apr;125(Pt 4):773-88. — View Citation

Carmichael ST, Tatsukawa K, Katsman D, Tsuyuguchi N, Kornblum HI. Evolution of diaschisis in a focal stroke model. Stroke. 2004 Mar;35(3):758-63. Epub 2004 Feb 12. — View Citation

Duque J, Murase N, Celnik P, Hummel F, Harris-Love M, Mazzocchio R, Olivier E, Cohen LG. Intermanual Differences in movement-related interhemispheric inhibition. J Cogn Neurosci. 2007 Feb;19(2):204-13. — View Citation

Grefkes C, Nowak DA, Wang LE, Dafotakis M, Eickhoff SB, Fink GR. Modulating cortical connectivity in stroke patients by rTMS assessed with fMRI and dynamic causal modeling. Neuroimage. 2010 Mar;50(1):233-42. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.029. Epub 2009 Dec 18. — View Citation

Kakuda W, Abo M, Kobayashi K, Momosaki R, Yokoi A, Fukuda A, Ishikawa A, Ito H, Tominaga A. Low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and intensive occupational therapy for poststroke patients with upper limb hemiparesis: preliminary study of a 15-day protocol. Int J Rehabil Res. 2010 Dec;33(4):339-45. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0b013e32833cdf10. — View Citation

Kakuda W, Abo M, Kobayashi K, Momosaki R, Yokoi A, Fukuda A, Ito H, Tominaga A, Umemori T, Kameda Y. Anti-spastic effect of low-frequency rTMS applied with occupational therapy in post-stroke patients with upper limb hemiparesis. Brain Inj. 2011;25(5):496-502. doi: 10.3109/02699052.2011.559610. — View Citation

Kakuda W, Abo M, Momosaki R, Yokoi A, Fukuda A, Ito H, Tominaga A, Umemori T, Kameda Y. Combined therapeutic application of botulinum toxin type A, low-frequency rTMS, and intensive occupational therapy for post-stroke spastic upper limb hemiparesis. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2012 Mar;48(1):47-55. Epub 2011 Nov 9. — View Citation

Kirton A, Chen R, Friefeld S, Gunraj C, Pontigon AM, Deveber G. Contralesional repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for chronic hemiparesis in subcortical paediatric stroke: a randomised trial. Lancet Neurol. 2008 Jun;7(6):507-13. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70096-6. Epub 2008 May 1. — View Citation

Kirton A, Deveber G, Gunraj C, Chen R. Cortical excitability and interhemispheric inhibition after subcortical pediatric stroke: plastic organization and effects of rTMS. Clin Neurophysiol. 2010 Nov;121(11):1922-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2010.04.021. — View Citation

Kujirai T, Caramia MD, Rothwell JC, Day BL, Thompson PD, Ferbert A, Wroe S, Asselman P, Marsden CD. Corticocortical inhibition in human motor cortex. J Physiol. 1993 Nov;471:501-19. — View Citation

Liepert J, Storch P, Fritsch A, Weiller C. Motor cortex disinhibition in acute stroke. Clin Neurophysiol. 2000 Apr;111(4):671-6. — View Citation

Málly J, Dinya E. Recovery of motor disability and spasticity in post-stroke after repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). Brain Res Bull. 2008 Jul 1;76(4):388-95. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2007.11.019. Epub 2007 Dec 26. — View Citation

Mathiowetz V, Federman S, Wiemer, D. Box and Block Test of Manual Dexterity: Norms for 6-19 Year Olds. CJOT. 1985b; 52(5): 241-245.

Mathiowetz V, Volland G, Kashman N, Weber K. Adult norms for the Box and Block Test of manual dexterity. Am J Occup Ther. 1985 Jun;39(6):386-91. — View Citation

McDonnell MN, Orekhov Y, Ziemann U. The role of GABA(B) receptors in intracortical inhibition in the human motor cortex. Exp Brain Res. 2006 Aug;173(1):86-93. Epub 2006 Feb 18. — View Citation

Murase N, Duque J, Mazzocchio R, Cohen LG. Influence of interhemispheric interactions on motor function in chronic stroke. Ann Neurol. 2004 Mar;55(3):400-9. — View Citation

Roger VL, Go AS, Lloyd-Jones DM, Benjamin EJ, Berry JD, Borden WB, Bravata DM, Dai S, Ford ES, Fox CS, Fullerton HJ, Gillespie C, Hailpern SM, Heit JA, Howard VJ, Kissela BM, Kittner SJ, Lackland DT, Lichtman JH, Lisabeth LD, Makuc DM, Marcus GM, Marelli A, Matchar DB, Moy CS, Mozaffarian D, Mussolino ME, Nichol G, Paynter NP, Soliman EZ, Sorlie PD, Sotoodehnia N, Turan TN, Virani SS, Wong ND, Woo D, Turner MB; American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Heart disease and stroke statistics--2012 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2012 Jan 3;125(1):e2-e220. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e31823ac046. Epub 2011 Dec 15. Erratum in: Circulation. 2012 Jun 5;125(22):e1002. — View Citation

Sommerfeld DK, Gripenstedt U, Welmer AK. Spasticity after stroke: an overview of prevalence, test instruments, and treatments. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Sep;91(9):814-20. Review. — View Citation

Theilig S, Podubecka J, Bösl K, Wiederer R, Nowak DA. Functional neuromuscular stimulation to improve severe hand dysfunction after stroke: does inhibitory rTMS enhance therapeutic efficiency? Exp Neurol. 2011 Jul;230(1):149-55. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2011.04.010. Epub 2011 Apr 16. — View Citation

Wassermann EM, Wedegaertner FR, Ziemann U, George MS, Chen R. Crossed reduction of human motor cortex excitability by 1-Hz transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neurosci Lett. 1998 Jul 10;250(3):141-4. — View Citation

Weiduschat N, Thiel A, Rubi-Fessen I, Hartmann A, Kessler J, Merl P, Kracht L, Rommel T, Heiss WD. Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in aphasic stroke: a randomized controlled pilot study. Stroke. 2011 Feb;42(2):409-15. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.597864. Epub 2010 Dec 16. — View Citation

* Note: There are 24 references in all — Click here to view all references

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Change in Baseline Ashworth Scale score from Day 1 (Pre-treatment) to Day 5 (Post-treatment)	The Ashworth scale will test resistance to passive movement around a joint with varying degrees of velocity, and will be used to assess muscle tone, and thus any improvement in spasticity.	Outcome will be assessed on Day 1 (Pre-treatment) and Day 5 (Post-treatment),(Treatment with rTMS will occur on Days 2-4)
Primary	Change in Baseline Active Range of Motion of the index finger metacarpophalangeal joint and wrist joint by electrogoniometer from Day 1 (Pre-treatment) to Day 5 (Post-treatment)	Range of motion testing will assess mobility of the joints with the aid of an electrogoniometer to help measure joint angles to assess improvement in impairment and disability of the affected joint.	Outcome will be assessed on Day 1 (Pre-treatment) and Day 5 (Post-treatment),(Treatment with rTMS will occur on Days 2-4)
Primary	Change in Baseline finger and wrist functional tracking movement from Day 1 (Pre-treatment) to Day 5 (Post-treatment)		Outcome will be assessed on Day 1 (Pre-treatment) and Day 5 (Post-treatment),(Treatment with rTMS will occur on Days 2-4)
Primary	Change in Baseline Corticospinal Excitability Measures from Day 1 (Pre-treatment) to Day 5 (Post-treatment)	Corticospinal excitability measures used will include threshold and motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude and cortical silent period duration	Outcome will be assessed on Day 1 (Pre-treatment) and Day 5 (Post-treatment),(Treatment with rTMS will occur on Days 2-4)
Secondary	Change in performance on the Box and Block Test from Baseline on Day 1 (Pre-treatment) to Day 5 (Post-treatment)	The Box and Block Test will measure unilateral gross manual dexterity to assess for functional improvement.	Outcome will be assessed on Day 1 (Pre-treatment) and Day 4 (Post-treatment),(Treatment with rTMS will occur on Days 2-4)
Secondary	Change in Baseline performance on the Stroke Impact Scale from Day 1 (Pre-treatment) to Day 5 (Post-treatment)	The Stroke Impact Scale is a 59 item questionnaire that will be utilized to evaluate aspects of stroke recovery and evaluate any improvement in strength, hand function, mobility and other parameters.	Outcome will be assessed on Day 1 (Pre-treatment) and Day 5 (Post-treatment),(Treatment with rTMS will occur on Days 2-4)