Efficacy and Safety of 10-Week or Shorter vs 12-Week or Longer Injection Intervals of Botulinum Toxin

Spasticity, Muscle Clinical Trial

Official title: Efficacy and Safety of 10-Week or Shorter vs 12-Week or Longer Injection Intervals of Botulinum Toxin for the Treatment of Muscle Spasm Associated With Neurological Disorders

Status Completed

Clinical Trial Summary

Our hypothesis is that botulinum toxin injections (with onabotulinum toxin, incobotulinum toxin, and abobotulinum toxin) given at 10-week or shorter intervals for the indication of treatment of muscle spasms associated with neurological disorders are associated with equal safety and effectiveness as those given at 12-week or longer intervals. We also hypothesize that for those patients who would prefer a shorter inter-injection interval, but for whom their insurance carrier has prevented this, have worse health-related quality of life compared to patients who receive injections at a 10-week or shorter interval. We aim to investigate this hypothesis by collecting demographic and injection data and patient survey responses.

Clinical Trial Description

Our project has the following aims: Aim 1: to determine if any difference exists in safety or efficacy between patients receiving injections of botulinum toxin at 10-week or shorter intervals as compared to patients receiving injections at 12-week or longer intervals. Aim 2: to determine if patients who have expressed a preference for injections at 10 week or shorter intervals but whose insurance carriers have mandated a 12-week interval have worse health related quality of life as compared to patients who are receiving injections at 10-week or shorter intervals. This project consists of two analyses, each designed to accomplish aims 1 and 2. For both aims, we will invite consecutive patients who meet entry criteria to participate who are followed in the botulinum toxin injection clinics of the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center movement disorders faculty. Participants who consent to data collection by participating in an email-administered survey of quality of life will have their medical records reviewed by an investigator for abstraction of clinical data (to include dose, injection site, injection interval, side effects, demographics, and diagnoses). Additionally, patients will fill out two or more survey instruments on the date of their enrollment visit following their botulinum toxin injection visit. The survey instruments completed will be 1) the SF-36 health questionnaire and 2) a disease-specific HRQoL survey chosen to be applicable to the specific condition for which that subject is receiving botulinum toxin injections. Patients receiving injections for multiple conditions will receive surveys for each condition for which they are receiving treatment. The disease specific scales to be used selectively depending on the patient's specific condition include: - Blepharospasm disability index - Craniocervical dystonia questionnaire (CDQ-24) - Arm dystonia disability scale (ADDS) - Hemifacial spasm scale (HSF-7) - Oromandibular dystonia questionnaire (OMDQ-25) - Spasticity scale (SQoL-6D) For analysis, patients will be segregated into two groups (10-week or shorter inter-injection interval and 12 week or longer inter-injection interval) on the basis of time elapsed between the most recent botulinum toxin treatments. Clinical and survey data will be analyzed to determine if differences exist between the two groups. ;

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Blepharospasm
• Cervical Dystonia
• Dystonia
• Dystonic Disorders
• Hemifacial Spasm
• Muscle Spasticity
• Spasm
• Spasticity, Muscle
• Torticollis

• NCT number: NCT05103202
• Study type: Observational
• Source: University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
• Status: Completed
• Start date: November 4, 2021
• Completion date: June 14, 2022