Solid Tumor Clinical Trial
Official title:
Personalised, Rational, Efficacy-driven Cancer Drug Dosing Via an Artificial Intelligence SystEm - CURATE.AI (PRECISE CURATE.AI Trial)
In the current clinical context, drug dosing in oncology is dictated by toxicity. The optimal dosages of drugs in combinatory regimens for solid tumours are not clear, and the typical physician's decision on dose adjustment is a clinical judgement based on the degree of toxicity experienced by the patient. CURATE.AI - a small data, AI-derived technology platform - allows personalised guidance of an individual's dose modulations based only on that individual's data. Additionally, CURATE.AI is mechanism-independent, and dynamically adapts to changes experienced by the subject, providing dynamic dose optimisation throughout the duration of the subject's treatment. This study aims to demonstrate the feasibility of applying CURATE.AI in standard of care settings for treatment of solid tumours. An additional objective is to explore tumour markers in serial measurements at weekly frequency of probing, with modulated doses.
| Status | Recruiting |
| Enrollment | 20 |
| Est. completion date | August 1, 2023 |
| Est. primary completion date | August 1, 2023 |
| Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
| Gender | All |
| Age group | 21 Years to 99 Years |
| Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: 1. General Inclusion Criteria 1. Males and females = 21 years of age. 2. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status of 0 to 2. 3. Patients must meet the following clinical laboratory criteria within 21 days of starting treatment: 1. Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) = 1,000/mm3 and platelet = 50,000/mm3 2. Total bilirubin = 1.5 x the upper limit of the normal range (ULN). Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) = 3 x ULN or = 5 ULN if involvement of the liver. 3. Calculated creatinine clearance = 30mL/min or creatinine < 1.5 x ULN Exclusion Criteria: 2. General Exclusion Criteria 1. Patients who are lactating or pregnant. 2. Major surgery within 28 days prior to start of the treatment. 3. Active congestive heart failure (New York Heart Association [NYHA] Class III or IV), symptomatic ischaemia, or conduction abnormalities uncontrolled by conventional intervention. Myocardial infarction within 4 months prior to informed consent obtained. 4. Patients with clinically significant hypersensitivity to one or more of the selected regimen's constituent drug(s) (e.g. patient's with clinically significant hypersensitivity to oxaliplatin may not be enrolled on the XELOX regimen, but may be allowed on the XELIRI regimen). 5. Contraindication to any of the required concomitant drugs or supportive treatments. 6. Any clinically significant medical disease or psychiatric condition that, in the investigator's opinion, may interfere with protocol adherence or a subject's ability to give informed consent. 3. Specific Recruitment Criteria for Cohort 1: Capecitabine in solid tumours i. Specific Inclusion Criteria 1. Metastatic solid tumours not for curative intent therapy; 2. Planned for treatment with the following chemotherapy regimens: XELOX, XELIRI or single agent capecitabine. 3. Patients must have raised tumour marker above upper limit of local laboratory normal (e.g. CEA, CA19-9). ii. Specific Exclusion Criteria Nil d. Specific Recruitment Criteria for Cohort 2: Ibrutinib in Waldenström macroglobulinaemia i. Specific Inclusion Criteria 1. Waldenström macroglobulinaemia (either newly diagnosed or relapsed) as defined by the World Health Organisation 2016 diagnostic criteria. 2. Immunofixation confirms immunoglobulin M paraprotein and total IgM > 2 x ULN. ii. Specific Exclusion Criteria 1. Systemic anti-lymphoma therapy within 3 weeks of enrolment. Steroids at a dose equivalent of prednisolone 30mg per day are allowed provided this is discontinued 72 hours prior to commencement of drug dosing on trial. 2. Need to withhold rituximab in view of the risk of IgM flare (applies to patients treated with rituximab-based regimens). 3. Platelet transfusion within 7 days of screening. 4. Granulocyte colony stimulating factor within 7 days of screening. |
| Country | Name | City | State |
|---|---|---|---|
| Singapore | National University Hospital | Singapore | |
| Singapore | Ng Teng Fong General Hospital | Singapore |
| Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
|---|---|
| National University Hospital, Singapore | The N.1 Institute for Health (N.1) |
Singapore,
Blasiak A, Khong J, Kee T. CURATE.AI: Optimizing Personalized Medicine with Artificial Intelligence. SLAS Technol. 2020 Apr;25(2):95-105. doi: 10.1177/2472630319890316. Epub 2019 Nov 26. — View Citation
Ho D. Artificial intelligence in cancer therapy. Science. 2020 Feb 28;367(6481):982-983. doi: 10.1126/science.aaz3023. No abstract available. — View Citation
Rashid MBMA, Toh TB, Hooi L, Silva A, Zhang Y, Tan PF, Teh AL, Karnani N, Jha S, Ho CM, Chng WJ, Ho D, Chow EK. Optimizing drug combinations against multiple myeloma using a quadratic phenotypic optimization platform (QPOP). Sci Transl Med. 2018 Aug 8;10( — View Citation
Thummel KE, Lin YS. Sources of interindividual variability. Methods Mol Biol. 2014;1113:363-415. doi: 10.1007/978-1-62703-758-7_17. — View Citation
Zarrinpar A, Lee DK, Silva A, Datta N, Kee T, Eriksen C, Weigle K, Agopian V, Kaldas F, Farmer D, Wang SE, Busuttil R, Ho CM, Ho D. Individualizing liver transplant immunosuppression using a phenotypic personalized medicine platform. Sci Transl Med. 2016 — View Citation
| Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Percentage of trial participants with clinical progressive disease | CT scans for radiological assessment will be performed according to standard of care, usually after every 2 to 3 cycles of chemotherapy
Percentage of trial participants with clinical progressive disease(which is defined as the clinical investigator deeming that the patient will not benefit any further from the chemotherapy regimen and considering stopping it) at the time of the first radiological assessment performed as per standard-of-care. |
Up to 12 months | |
| Other | Temporal variation in tumour marker level from baseline to trial conclusion. | Mandatory blood draws for the measurement of tumour marker(s)as per standard of care.Additional blood draws solely for the purposes of the trial for measurements of tumour markers(s)
Tumour marker measurements at higher frequency will be analysed to inform about temporal dynamics of tumour response to modulated dosing. |
Up to 12 months | |
| Other | Maximal reduction in tumour marker level measured as part of baseline investigations | For CURATE.AI profile generation, a minimum of 3 dose levels and corresponding tumour marker (CEA/CA19-9/Ig M) readouts are needed for the modulated drug. After obtaining the first tumour marker readout a set of potential doses of capecitabine or Ibrutinib to pick from will be recommended by the CURATE.AI team with calibration-intent, based on the mathematical requirements of the method.
If the modulations do not yield a dose-dependent response (e.g. biomarker readouts were affected by the factors unrelated to capecitabine or Ibrutinib modulation) a new data pair will have to be acquired according to calibration-intent recommendation from the CURATE.AI team. When dose-dependent response is obtained, the profile will be checked for actionability - an ability to recommend an optimum dose within the pre-specified personal safety range. |
Up to 12 months | |
| Other | Toxicity derived from the use of CURATE.AI | Percentage of trial participants with clinically relevant toxicities of grades 3-4 based on CTCAE version 4.0. | Up to 12 months | |
| Other | ctDNA and/or sFLC analysis | Data collection and explorative analysis of the ctDNA and/or sFLC as: (1) a tumour marker in serial measurements at given clinical context and after modulated dosing; (2) potential input for CURATE.AI | Up to 12 months | |
| Other | Tumour markers analysis | Data collection and explorative analysis of CEA , CA19-9 , Ig M and/or other traditional tumour markers in higher frequency serial measurements after modulated dosing in relation to standard frequency readings and other efficacy measures, e.g RECIST criteria or IWWM-8 | Up to 12 months | |
| Primary | Percentage of participants in whom we successfully apply CURATE.AI profile. | CURATE.AI applicability: Percentage of participants in whom we successfully apply CURATE.AI profile. Based on percentages, outcomes will be classified as Green (>70%) / Yellow (10-70%) / Red (<10%).
A decision on whether we "successfully apply" the CURATE.AI profile requires expert judgement and cannot be made based on a purely numerical process. The expert panel will consider the following factors with careful regard for the individual circumstances of each participant: Error/variance (biological/analytical) is sufficiently small to allow accurate predictions Profile can be generated sufficiently early for the participant to potentially benefit; Dose-dependent relationship is observed; Profile is actionable (i.e. fulfils the clinical investigator's pre-specified safety requirements); Systemic changes in the participant which require profile recalibration are rare or readily assimilated into the CURATE.AI algorithm. |
Up to 12 months | |
| Secondary | Patient adherence | Percentage of participants who always adhered to the prescribed dose whenever they took their medication, as measured by the standardised pharmacovigilance protocol. Based on percentages, outcomes will be classified as Green (>90%) / Yellow (10-90%) / Red (<10%). | Up to 12 months | |
| Secondary | Timely delivery of CURATE.AI recommendations to the clinician | Percentage of CURATE.AI recommendations provided in time for the next chemotherapy cycle, across all participants and cycles. Based on percentages, outcomes will be classified as Green (100%) / Yellow (10-99%) / Red (<10%). | Up to 12 months | |
| Secondary | CURATE.AI relevance | Percentage of dosing events across all participants and cycles in which CURATE.AI recommendation is considered in the clinical decision-making process. Based on percentages, outcomes will be classified as Green (100%) / Yellow (10-99%) / Red (<10%). | Up to 12 months | |
| Secondary | Physician adherence | Percentage of CURATE.AI recommended doses that were used by the clinical investigator. Based on percentages, outcomes will be classified as Green (>70%) / Yellow (10-70%) / Red (<10%). | Up to 12 months | |
| Secondary | Clinically significant dose changes | Percentage of participants in whom the CURATE.AI-guided cumulative dose is substantially (=10%) different from the projected standard-of-care cumulative dose. Based on percentages, outcomes will be classified as Green (>20%) / Yellow (1-20%) / Red (0%). | Up to 12 months |
| Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Recruiting |
NCT05580991 -
Intratumoral CAN1012(Selective TLR7 Agonist) in Subjects With Solid Tumors
|
Phase 1 | |
| Recruiting |
NCT05691608 -
MoleculAr Profiling for Pediatric and Young Adult Cancer Treatment Stratification 2
|
N/A | |
| Active, not recruiting |
NCT02846038 -
Understanding Communication in Healthcare to Achieve Trust (U-CHAT)
|
||
| Recruiting |
NCT05159388 -
A Study of PRS-344/S095012 (PD-L1x4-1BB Bispecific Antibody-Anticalin Fusion) in Patients With Solid Tumors
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
| Completed |
NCT03181854 -
Randomized Controlled Trial of Integrated Early Palliative Care
|
N/A | |
| Recruiting |
NCT05981703 -
A Study Investigating BGB-26808 Alone or in Combination With Tislelizumab in Participants With Advanced Solid Tumors
|
Phase 1 | |
| Recruiting |
NCT06014502 -
Study to Evaluate IMGS-001 Treatment in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Advanced Solid Tumors
|
Phase 1 | |
| Recruiting |
NCT04107311 -
Prospective Analysis of Intestinal Microbiome and Autoimmune Panels as Predictors of Toxicity in ImmunOncology Patients
|
||
| Active, not recruiting |
NCT04078152 -
Durvalumab Long-Term Safety and Efficacy Study
|
Phase 4 | |
| Completed |
NCT02250157 -
A Dose-regimen Finding Study to Evaluate Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics and Activity of Oratecan in Subjects With Advanced Malignancies
|
Phase 1 | |
| Recruiting |
NCT05566574 -
A Study of RP-3500 in Combination With Standard Radiation Therapy in People With Solid Tumor Cancer
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
| Recruiting |
NCT03943004 -
Trial of DFP-14927 in Advanced Solid Tumors
|
Phase 1 | |
| Recruiting |
NCT06036836 -
Study of Favezelimab Coformulated With Pembrolizumab (MK-4280A) in Participants With Selected Solid Tumors (MK-4280A-010)
|
Phase 2 | |
| Recruiting |
NCT05798546 -
Treatment of Advanced Solid Tumors With Neo-T(GI-NeoT-02)
|
Phase 1 | |
| Recruiting |
NCT05525858 -
KPMNG Study of MOlecular Profiling Guided Therapy Based on Genomic Alterations in Advanced Solid Tumors II
|
||
| Terminated |
NCT04586335 -
Study of CYH33 in Combination With Olaparib an Oral PARP Inhibitor in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors.
|
Phase 1 | |
| Active, not recruiting |
NCT00479128 -
Bortezomib With Gemcitabine/Doxorubicin in Patients With Urothelial Cancer and Other Solid Tumors
|
Phase 1 | |
| Recruiting |
NCT04143789 -
Evaluation of AP-002 in Patients With Solid Tumors
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
| Not yet recruiting |
NCT04550663 -
NKG2D CAR-T(KD-025) in the Treatment of Relapsed or Refractory NKG2DL+ Tumors
|
Phase 1 | |
| Completed |
NCT03980041 -
Study to Evaluate the Efficacy/Safety of IPI-549 in Combination With Nivolumab in Patients With Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma (MARIO-275)
|
Phase 2 |