Smoking Cessation Clinical Trial
— PANSOfficial title:
Progesterone Augmentation of Nicotine Replacement Therapy Study
Verified date | July 2019 |
Source | Yale University |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
This will be a double-blind, placebo-controlled, pilot, randomized clinical trial. A total of 50 women who smoke and have regular menstrual cycles will be randomized to either progesterone (200 mgs BID) + Transdermal Nicotine Patch (TNP) or placebo + TNP for 8 weeks. TNP will be tapered after 4-6 weeks. Progesterone or matching placebo will be discontinued at the end of Week 8. All participants will also be provided behavioral treatment for smoking cessation. Participants will be inducted onto progesterone (or placebo) + TNP over a one-week period (Week 1) during the mid luteal phase, within a week before menses and the target quit date will be set for the 5 (+/-2) days after onset of menses. Participants will have post-trial follow-up visits at 1 and 3 months.The main study outcomes will be self- report of smoking abstinence, biochemically verified smoking abstinence, measures of cigarette craving and nicotine withdrawal, and measures of response inhibition.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 64 |
Est. completion date | March 12, 2018 |
Est. primary completion date | December 18, 2017 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | Female |
Age group | 18 Years to 45 Years |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Aged 18 - 45 - Smoking at least 5 cigarettes/ day for at least one year - Regular menstrual cycles every 24-36 days for the previous 6 months - Motivated to quit smoking (i.e., a rating of at least "7 "on a 10-point scale where 1 is not at all motivated and 10 is extremely motivated) - In good health - Using an acceptable, non-hormonal birth control Exclusion Criteria: A history of major medical or psychological illnesses including: - liver disease - heart disease - diabetes - malignancy including history of breast cancer - deep vein thrombosis - blood coagulation problems including a history or family history of thrombophilia - liver failure - cervical intra-epithelial lesions III or greater that are untreated - other medical conditions that the physician investigators deems will make study participation unsafe for the subject - current or past history bipolar disorder or schizophrenia - current diagnosis of major depression - panic disorder or post-traumatic stress disorder - active drug (non-nicotine) and/or alcohol dependence - currently undergoing treatment with another pharmacological agent for smoking cessation - regular use of sedating medications including sleeping aids, antihistamines, and others use of nicotine from cigars, pipes, chewing tobacco - pregnant - breast- feeding or intending to become pregnant within 6 months - allergy to nicotine patch or progesterone - allergy to peanuts or other nuts. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United States | Yale School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry | New Haven | Connecticut |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Yale University | National Cancer Institute (NCI) |
United States,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | 7-day Point Prevalence of Smoking Abstinence | The 7-day point prevalence is defined by self-reported smoking abstinence for the last 7 days. | end of 8 weeks of treatment | |
Secondary | Carbon Monoxide <10 Ppm | Smoking abstinence measured by breath CO | end of 8 weeks of treatment | |
Secondary | Carbon Monoxide <10 Ppm | Smoking abstinence measured by breath CO | 1 month follow up | |
Secondary | Carbon Monoxide <10 Ppm | Smoking abstinence measured by breath CO | 3 month follow up | |
Secondary | Change in Stroop Measure of Inhibitory Function | The Stroop test assesses cognitive processing. The Level 3 Stroop Throughput score incorporates both accuracy and speed. In Level 3 of the Stroop test, a series of words representing colors are shown in a font color that is incongruent with the word (e.g. RED would be shown in blue font). Users are asked to press a response key associated with the color of the font, not the written word. Quicker and more accurate responses lead to higher scores. The lowest possible score is 0 (no correct responses). There is no defined maximum score, as the score depends upon both response time and number of correct responses. A Level 3 Stroop Throughput change score was calculated by subtracting baseline score from week 2 score. Higher positive scores represent greater improvement in scores at week 2 relative to baseline, and lower negative scores represent greater decline in scores from baseline to week 2. | baseline and week 2 | |
Secondary | Change in Go/No Go Task Measure of Inhibitory Function | Week 2 minus baseline. This task assesses the ability to withhold responses to an infrequently occurring target (No-Go trials). A total of 225 single digits (25 x 9 digits) are presented on a computer monitor for 250 ms each, immediately followed by a mask for 900 ms. Subjects must press a spacebar in response to every digit except the "3". Go/No Go score is calculated as separation between the means of the signal and the noise distributions and is reported in standard deviation units, representing an overall indicator of performance since it accounts for correct responses and incorrect responses. Higher scores represent a better outcome. For the change score, higher positive scores represent greater improvement in scores between baseline and week 2, and lower negative scores represent greater decline in scores between baseline and week 2. |
baseline and week 2 | |
Secondary | Change in Digit Symbol Task Measure of Inhibitory Function | The Code Substitution Test (a computerized adaptation/variant of the Digit Symbol Substitution Test) is a test of psychomotor performance. The Code Substitution-Learning Throughput Score incorporates both accuracy and speed. During the learning phase of this test, users are continuously shown a row of 9 digits that are paired with a symbol (the pairings are constant). Users are presented with a series of individual pairings and are asked to press a response key to indicate if the pairing is correct or not. Quicker and more accurate responses lead to higher scores. The lowest possible score is 0 (no correct responses). There is no defined maximum score, as the score depends upon both response time and number of correct responses. A change score was calculated by subtracting baseline score from week 2 score. Higher positive scores represent greater improvement in scores at week 2 relative to baseline, and lower negative scores represent greater decline in scores from baseline to week 2. | baseline and week 2 | |
Secondary | Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) Total Score | The PANAS questionnaire consists of 20 items that describe different feelings and emotions. Participants are asked to what extent they feel this way right now on 5-point scale ranging from 1 (very slightly or not at all) to 5 (extremely). Separate Positive Affect Scores and Negative Affect Scores were calculated from 10 items each. Scores can range from 10 t0 50, with higher scores representing higher levels of positive affect and with lower scores representing lower levels of negative affect. | Baseline | |
Secondary | Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) Total Score | The PANAS questionnaire consists of 20 items that describe different feelings and emotions. Participants are asked to what extent they feel this way right now on 5-point scale ranging from 1 (very slightly or not at all) to 5 (extremely). Separate Positive Affect Scores and Negative Affect Scores were calculated from 10 items each. Scores can range from 10 t0 50, with higher scores representing higher levels of positive affect and with lower scores representing lower levels of negative affect. | Week 2 | |
Secondary | Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) Total Score | The PANAS questionnaire consists of 20 items that describe different feelings and emotions. Participants are asked to what extent they feel this way right now on 5-point scale ranging from 1 (very slightly or not at all) to 5 (extremely). Separate Positive Affect Scores and Negative Affect Scores were calculated from 10 items each. Scores can range from 10 t0 50, with higher scores representing higher levels of positive affect and with lower scores representing lower levels of negative affect. | Week 3 | |
Secondary | Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) Total Score | The PANAS questionnaire consists of 20 items that describe different feelings and emotions. Participants are asked to what extent they feel this way right now on 5-point scale ranging from 1 (very slightly or not at all) to 5 (extremely). Separate Positive Affect Scores and Negative Affect Scores were calculated from 10 items each. Scores can range from 10 t0 50, with higher scores representing higher levels of positive affect and with lower scores representing lower levels of negative affect. | Week 4 | |
Secondary | Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) Total Score | The PANAS questionnaire consists of 20 items that describe different feelings and emotions. Participants are asked to what extent they feel this way right now on 5-point scale ranging from 1 (very slightly or not at all) to 5 (extremely). Separate Positive Affect Scores and Negative Affect Scores were calculated from 10 items each. Scores can range from 10 t0 50, with higher scores representing higher levels of positive affect and with lower scores representing lower levels of negative affect. | Week 5 | |
Secondary | Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) Total Score | The PANAS questionnaire consists of 20 items that describe different feelings and emotions. Participants are asked to what extent they feel this way right now on 5-point scale ranging from 1 (very slightly or not at all) to 5 (extremely). Separate Positive Affect Scores and Negative Affect Scores were calculated from 10 items each. Scores can range from 10 t0 50, with higher scores representing higher levels of positive affect and with lower scores representing lower levels of negative affect. | Week 6 | |
Secondary | Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) Total Score | The PANAS questionnaire consists of 20 items that describe different feelings and emotions. Participants are asked to what extent they feel this way right now on 5-point scale ranging from 1 (very slightly or not at all) to 5 (extremely). Separate Positive Affect Scores and Negative Affect Scores were calculated from 10 items each. Scores can range from 10 t0 50, with higher scores representing higher levels of positive affect and with lower scores representing lower levels of negative affect. | Week 7 | |
Secondary | Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) Total Score | The PANAS questionnaire consists of 20 items that describe different feelings and emotions. Participants are asked to what extent they feel this way right now on 5-point scale ranging from 1 (very slightly or not at all) to 5 (extremely). Separate Positive Affect Scores and Negative Affect Scores were calculated from 10 items each. Scores can range from 10 t0 50, with higher scores representing higher levels of positive affect and with lower scores representing lower levels of negative affect. | Week 8 | |
Secondary | Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) Total Score | The PANAS questionnaire consists of 20 items that describe different feelings and emotions. Participants are asked to what extent they feel this way right now on 5-point scale ranging from 1 (very slightly or not at all) to 5 (extremely). Separate Positive Affect Scores and Negative Affect Scores were calculated from 10 items each. Scores can range from 10 t0 50, with higher scores representing higher levels of positive affect and with lower scores representing lower levels of negative affect. | 1 month follow up | |
Secondary | Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) Total Score | The PANAS questionnaire consists of 20 items that describe different feelings and emotions. Participants are asked to what extent they feel this way right now on 5-point scale ranging from 1 (very slightly or not at all) to 5 (extremely). Separate Positive Affect Scores and Negative Affect Scores were calculated from 10 items each. Scores can range from 10 t0 50, with higher scores representing higher levels of positive affect and with lower scores representing lower levels of negative affect. | 3 month follow up | |
Secondary | Prolonged Abstinence Post Trial | Abstinence from 2 weeks post quit date to the one month follow up | 1-month follow-up after end of treatment | |
Secondary | Prolonged Abstinence Follow up | Abstinence from 2 weeks post quit date to 3 month follow up (total of 6-8 weeks during the trial and 3 month follow up) | 3-month follow-up after end of treatment |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT04043728 -
Addressing Psychological Risk Factors Underlying Smoking Persistence in COPD Patients: The Fresh Start Study
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03999411 -
Smartphone Intervention for Smoking Cessation and Improving Adherence to Treatment Among HIV Patients
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT04617444 -
The ESTxENDS Trial- Substudy on Effects of Using Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems (ENDS) on Olfactory Function
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02796391 -
Facilitating Smoking Cessation With Reduced Nicotine Cigarettes
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT03397511 -
Incorporating Financial Incentives to Increase Smoking Cessation Among Asian Americans Residing in New York City
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05188287 -
A Culturally Tailored Smartphone Application for African American Smokers
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05264428 -
The Effect of Honey on Lessening the Withdrawal Symptoms
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05846841 -
Personalized Tobacco Treatment in Primary Care (MOTIVATE)
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04133064 -
Assessment of the Pivot Breath Sensor: Single-Arm Cohort Study
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03187730 -
Integrating Financial Management Counseling and Smoking Cessation Counseling to Reduce Health and Economic Disparities in Low-Income Immigrants
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT03474783 -
To Explore the Factors Affecting the Effectiveness of Smoking Cessation
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04635358 -
Feasibility Study of Smoking Cessation for the Staff of a Hospital Center
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT03670264 -
BE Smokefree: Behavioral Economics Incentives to Engage Adolescents in Smoking Cessation
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06307496 -
VIDeOS for Smoking Cessation
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02997657 -
Positive Psychotherapy for Smoking Cessation Enhanced With Text Messaging: A Randomized Controlled Trial
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02905656 -
Strategies to Promote Cessation in Smokers Who Are Not Ready To Quit
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03206619 -
A Health Recommeder System to Tailor Message Preferences in a Smoking Cessation Programme
|
||
Completed |
NCT02562521 -
A Smoking Cessation Intervention for Yale Dining Employees
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT02239770 -
Pharmacokinetics of Nicotine Film in Smokers
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT02422914 -
Benefits of Tobacco Free Cigarette
|
N/A |