Small Cell Lung Cancer Clinical Trial
Official title:
A Phase 1/2 Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Lorvotuzumab Mertansine in Combination With Carboplatin/Etoposide in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors Including Extensive Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer
Verified date | December 2017 |
Source | ImmunoGen, Inc. |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
The purpose of this study is to test safety and efficacy of this combination treatment (IMGN901, carboplatin and etoposide) in patients with solid tumors and extensive stage small cell lung cancer.
Status | Terminated |
Enrollment | 181 |
Est. completion date | May 2015 |
Est. primary completion date | May 2015 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Patients must be 18 years old - Patients must have been diagnosed with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) and extensive disease - ECOG performance status of 0, 1, or 2 - No prior systemic chemotherapy for the treatment of SCLC Exclusion Criteria: - Pregnant or lactating females |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Canada | Juravinski Cancer Center | Hamilton | Ontario |
Canada | Jewish General Hospital | Montreal | Quebec |
Canada | Montreal General Hospital | Montreal | Quebec |
Canada | Royal Victoria | Montreal | Quebec |
Canada | St. Mary's Hospital | Montreal | Quebec |
Spain | Hospital de la Santa Creu y Sand Pau | Barcelona | |
Spain | Hospital Vall d'Hebron | Barcelona | |
Spain | Hospital Universitario | Madrid | |
Spain | Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre | Madrid | |
Spain | Corporacio Sanitaria Parc Tauli | Sabadell | Barcelona |
Spain | Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio | Sevilla | |
United Kingdom | Royal Sussex Hospital | Brighton | East Sussex |
United Kingdom | Royal Marsden, London | London | |
United Kingdom | University College of London | London | England |
United Kingdom | Royal Marsden | Sutton | Surrey |
United Kingdom | The Christie Hospital | Withington | Manchester |
United States | Anne Arundel Medical Center | Annapolis | Maryland |
United States | Bayview Medical Center | Baltimore | Maryland |
United States | Greater Baltimore Medical Center | Baltimore | Maryland |
United States | Johns Hopkins University | Baltimore | Maryland |
United States | Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center | Boston | Massachusetts |
United States | Dana Farber Cancer Institute | Boston | Massachusetts |
United States | Massachusetts General Hospital | Boston | Massachusetts |
United States | University Hospitals of Cleveland | Cleveland | Ohio |
United States | South Carolina Oncology Associates | Columbia | South Carolina |
United States | Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute | Detroit | Michigan |
United States | Holy Cross Hospital Bienes Comprehensive Cancer Center | Fort Lauderdale | Florida |
United States | University of Florida | Gainesville | Florida |
United States | Johnson Therurer Cancer Center at Hackensack | Hackensack | New Jersey |
United States | University of Tennessee Medical Center Cancer Institute | Knoxville | Tennessee |
United States | UCLA Oncology Center | Los Angeles | California |
United States | UPMC Cancer Centers East, Oxford Drive | Monroeville | Pennsylvania |
United States | Sarah Cannon Research Institute | Nashville | Tennessee |
United States | Yale Medical Center | New Haven | Connecticut |
United States | Oklahoma University | Oklahoma City | Oklahoma |
United States | St. Joseph's Hospital | Orange | California |
United States | UCLA Hematology | Pasadena | California |
United States | Univeristy of Pittsburg Medical Center | Pittsburgh | Pennsylvania |
United States | UPMC Cancer Center at UPMC Passavant (HOA) | Pittsburgh | Pennsylvania |
United States | UPMC Cancer Center St. Margaret | Pittsburgh | Pennsylvania |
United States | Oregon Health and Science University | Portland | Oregon |
United States | UTHSC at San Antonio | San Antonio | Texas |
United States | UCLA Oncology Clinic | Santa Monica | California |
United States | Northwest Medical Specialties | Tacoma | Washington |
United States | Arizona Cancer Center @ UMC North | Tucson | Arizona |
United States | UCLA Santa Clarita Valley Cancer Center | Valencia | California |
United States | Sibley Memorial Hospital | Washington | District of Columbia |
United States | UCLA Oncology Center | Westlake Village | California |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
ImmunoGen, Inc. |
United States, Canada, Spain, United Kingdom,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Occurrence of Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT) | The primary outcome measure for Phase I was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and characterize the dose limiting toxicities (DLT) of IMGN901 when administered in combination with carboplatin/etoposide chemotherapy followed by IMGN901 alone in patients with solid tumors. For the purposes of dose escalation and determination of MTD, DLTs were defined as AEs or abnormal laboratory values related to study treatment which occurred in Cycle 1 of the Dose Escalation phase, including any AEs that resulted in failure to meet the criteria for re-treatment. The following events were considered DLTs (using the most current version of CTCAE): febrile neutropenia; Grade 4 thrombocytopenia or Grade 3 thrombocytopenia with bleeding; = Grade 3 peripheral neuropathy; = Grade 3 vomiting, nausea, or diarrhea that persisted despite the use of optimal therapy; other = grade 3 non-hematologic toxicity (with the exception of brief fatigue i.e. = 72 hours and alopecia) | 21 days (Cycle 1) | |
Primary | Progression Free Survival (PFS) in Phase II | The primary outcome measure for Phase II was to determine the efficacy of IMGN901 in combination with carboplatin/etoposide chemotherapy as first-line treatment for patients with extensive stage small cell lung cancer. PFS was defined as the time from enrollment until objective tumor progression according to RECIST 1.1 or death on study due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Only the results from the experimental arm (IMGN901 + carboplatin + etoposide) are presented as the primary objective of this phase of the study was to compare PFS in the experimental arm (triplet combination) against historical PFS rates for carboplatin and etoposide. The control arm was planned primarily to reliably assess the safety of IMGN901 and to demonstrate whether the or not the historical assumptions regarding efficacy were confirmed. | From randomization to objective tumor progression or death (up to post-treatment follow-up 28 days after last dose, up to 22 months) | |
Primary | Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of IMGN901 | A primary outcome measure for Phase I was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of IMGN901 when administered in combination with carboplatin/etoposide chemotherapy followed by IMGN901 alone in patients with solid tumors. The MTD was determined based on DLTs that occurred during Cycle 1. | 21 days (Cycle 1) | |
Secondary | Overview of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | To assess the type and frequency of Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs). An AE was defined as any noxious, pathologic, or unintended change un anatomical, physiologic, or metabolic function as indicated by physical signs, symptoms, or laboratory changes occurring in any phase of the study, whether or not deemed study drug-related. An SAE was any AE resulting in death, life-threatening experience, initial or prolonged in-patient hospitalization, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or congenital defect. All AEs were reported from the time of the first dose of study treatment until 28 days after the final dose of study drug. the severity of AEs were graded by the Investigator using National cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for AEs (CTCAE) version 4.0. | From the first dose of study drug on Cycle 1, Day 1 until 28 days after the last study treatment (up to 22 months) | |
Secondary | Progression Free Survival (PFS) Rate at 6 Months | The trial was not empowered to permit a statistically informative comparison of the randomized treatment groups with respect to PFS. The activity of IMGN901 was assessed by comparing the PFS rate at 6 months in the IMGN901 experimental arm against the historical 6-month PFS rate of 0.44 (equivalently a median PFS = 5 months). Only the results from the experimental arm (IMGN901 + carboplatin + etoposide) are presented as the objective was to compare PFS at 6 months in the experimental arm (triplet combination) against the historical PFS rate of 0.44 (equivalently a median PFS = 5 months) for carboplatin and etoposide. The control arm was planned primarily to reliably assess the safety of IMGN901 and to demonstrate whether the or not the historical assumptions regarding efficacy were confirmed. | 6 months | |
Secondary | Median Overall Survival (OS) in Phase II | A secondary outcome measure for Phase II was to determine the overall survival of patients treated with IMGN901 in combination with carboplatin/etoposide chemotherapy versus carboplatin/etoposide chemotherapy alone as first-line treatment for patients with extensive stage small cell lung cancer. | From the time of enrollment until death on study due to any cause (up to post-treatment follow-up 28 days after last dose, up to 22 months) | |
Secondary | Overall Survival (OS) Rate at 12 Months | OS was analyzed based on a binary definition of the number of patients dead or censored prior to 12 months and the number of patients alive at 12 months. The primary objective of this phase of the study was to compare PFS in the experimental arm (triplet combination) against historical PFS rates. The control arm was primarily planned to demonstrate whether the or not the historical assumptions regarding efficacy were confirmed. Further, the trial was not empowered to permit a statistically informative comparison of the randomized treatment groups with respect to OS and no determination of the OS rate at 12 months for the control arm was performed; therefore only the results from the experimental arm (IMGN901 + carboplatin + etoposide) are presented. | 12 months |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Not yet recruiting |
NCT03651219 -
Mesylate Apatinib Combined With Irinotecan in Treatment of Recurrent Small Cell Lung Cancer
|
Phase 3 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03958045 -
Combination Rucaparib With Nivolumab in Small Cell Lung Carcinoma
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT04381910 -
Irinotecan Hydrochloride Liposome Injection (LY01610) For Small Cell Lung Cancer
|
Phase 2 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04885998 -
AMG 757 and AMG 404 in Subjects With Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC)
|
Phase 1 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03703297 -
Study of Durvalumab + Tremelimumab, Durvalumab, and Placebo in Limited Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer in Patients Who Have Not Progressed Following Concurrent Chemoradiation Therapy
|
Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05903092 -
MOnaliZumab in Combination With durvAlumab (MEDI4736) Plus Platinum-based chemotheRapy for First-line Treatment of Extensive Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT03652077 -
A Safety and Tolerability Study of INCAGN02390 in Select Advanced Malignancies
|
Phase 1 | |
Terminated |
NCT04422210 -
A Study Evaluating The Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, And Efficacy Of Venetoclax In Combination With Atezolizumab, Carboplatin, And Etoposide In Participants With Untreated Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer (ES-SCLC).
|
Phase 1 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT02875457 -
Apatinib as the Maintenance Therapy for Extensive Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer After Combined With Etoposide/Cisplatin
|
Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT02577627 -
Multi-Indication, Retrospective Oncological Study to Validate the Accuracy in Predicting TTP by PrediCare in Patients Under SOC
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT02605811 -
Temozolomide in Preventing Brain Metastases in Small Cell Lung Cancer
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT02551432 -
Pembrolizumab and Paclitaxel in Refractory Small Cell Lung Cancer
|
Phase 2 | |
Withdrawn |
NCT02542137 -
Abscopal Effect for Metastatic Small Cell Lung Cancer
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT02262897 -
The Efficacy and Safety of Nab-paclitaxel in Pretreated Patients With Extensive Disease of Small Cell Lung Cancer
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT01831089 -
Phase I Study of Lurbinectedin (PM01183) in Combination With Paclitaxel, With or Without Bevacizumab, in Selected Advanced Solid Tumors
|
Phase 1 | |
Terminated |
NCT00969306 -
Chloroquine as an Anti-Autophagy Drug in Stage IV Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC) Patients
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT01943578 -
Value of Physical Capacity Tests in Lung Cancer
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01497873 -
A Randomized Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Belotecan and Topotecan as Monotherapy for Sensitive-Relapsed Small Cell Lung Cancer
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT00930891 -
Bevacizumab in Extensive Small Cell Lung Cancer
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
Terminated |
NCT00958022 -
Carboplatin and Etoposide Plus LBH589 for Small Cell Lung Cancer
|
Phase 1 |