Outcome
| Type |
Measure |
Description |
Time frame |
Safety issue |
| Primary |
Trial-related feasibility - recruitment capability |
Recruitment capability will be measured by the proportion of eligible children who enroll at baseline. |
Through recruitment period, up to 6 weeks |
|
| Primary |
Trial-related feasibility - retention |
Retention will be measured by the proportion of enrolled children who remain in the study through the length of the intervention. Reasons for dropout will also be assessed. |
Weekly through study completion (weeks 1-5) |
|
| Primary |
Intervention-related feasibility - intervention fidelity |
Intervention fidelity, the delivery of the intervention as originally planned, will be assessed via teacher report. Intervention fidelity will be assessed with a study-specific questionnaire to assess if all classroom components were delivered as planned. |
Weekly through study completion (weeks 1-4) |
|
| Primary |
Intervention-related feasibility - rate of attendance |
Children's attendance at school during intervention sessions will be provided by class records. |
Weekly through study completion (weeks 1-4) |
|
| Primary |
Intervention-related feasibility - participant adherence to intervention (home) |
Adherence to the home-based component will rely on link usage data to assess parent engagement with the online materials. Investigators will extract information related to the number of parents who click links from weekly material and number of parents who do not open links. |
Weekly through study completion (weeks 1-4) |
|
| Primary |
Intervention-related feasibility - participant adherence to intervention (school) |
School-based adherence will be assessed by a teacher-completed survey which will indicate whether or not they implemented the intervention each week. |
Weekly through study completion (weeks 1-4) |
|
| Primary |
Intervention-related feasibility - data collection completion rates |
Data collection completion rates will be calculated to understand the feasibility of data collection protocols. |
Weekly through study completion (weeks 1-4) |
|
| Primary |
Intervention-related feasibility - data collection feasibility |
Feasibility of data collection procedures will be assessed with qualitative feedback from parents during semi-structured interviews following the study. |
Post-intervention (week 5-7) |
|
| Primary |
Acceptability |
Acceptability of the intervention conditions is defined as participants' perception that the intervention is satisfactory and will be assessed with short weekly questionnaires for parents and teachers. Overall acceptability will be assessed with an exit-survey consisting of Likert-scale items and open-ended responses to understand likes/dislikes, content, logistics, and feedback for future iterations. Likert-style questions will have response options ranging from 1-5 with greater scores representing higher acceptability. |
Weekly through study completion (weeks 1-4), post-intervention (week 5-7) |
|
| Secondary |
Child sleep - device-based duration |
Objective nocturnal sleep duration will be assessed using Axivity AX3 accelerometers worn on the non-dominant wrist for 7 days. Raw accelerometry data will be processed with open-source software, GGIR. |
Baseline (week 0) and post-intervention (week 5) |
|
| Secondary |
Child sleep - device-based timing |
Objective sleep timing will be assessed using Axivity AX3 accelerometers worn on the non-dominant wrist for 7 days. Raw accelerometry data will be processed with open-source software, GGIR. |
Baseline (week 0) and post-intervention (week 5) |
|
| Secondary |
Child sleep - Bedtime Routines Questionnaire |
Parents will complete the Bedtime Routines Questionnaire which contains 31 items on a 5-point Likert scale. This questionnaire results in two subscales - bedtime routine consistency and routine behaviors and environment. Higher scores indicate more consistent bedtime routines. |
Baseline (week 0) and post-intervention (week 5) |
|
| Secondary |
Child behavior |
Parents and teachers will complete the Child Self-Regulation and Behavior Questionnaire (CSBQ, ~10 min) which contains 34 items describing children's typical self-regulation and social behaviors in the home (parent version) and classroom (teacher version). Respondents describe what the child's behavior is like on a five-point scale ranging from "Not true" to "Very true." The CSBQ provides the following subscales: self-regulation, sociability, externalizing problems, internalizing problems, and prosocial behavior. The CSBQ is valid and reliable in children ages 3-6 years. |
Baseline (week 0) and post-intervention (week 5) |
|
| Secondary |
Child inhibition |
Inhibition (i.e., the ability to control behavioral impulses) will be assessed with the Go/No-Go task in which children are asked to identify fish and avoid sharks shown on the screen on an iPad as part of the freely accessible Early Years Toolbox. An impulse control score is calculated (% Go Accuracy x % No-Go Accuracy), which reflects the child's ability to withhold their response in the context of the strength of that typical (pre-potent) response. |
Baseline (week 0) and post-intervention (week 5) |
|
| Secondary |
Child working memory |
Working memory (i.e., amount of information that can be coordinated in the mind) will be assessed with the Mr. Ant task in which children will recall and identify the location of colorful stickers on Mr. Ant's body on an iPad as part of the freely accessible Early Years Toolbox. For the Mr Ant task, scores are calculated using a point score calculated as: beginning from level 1, one point for each consecutive level in which at least two of the three trials were performed accurately, plus 1/3 of a point for all correct trials thereafter. |
Baseline (week 0) and post-intervention (week 5) |
|
| Secondary |
Child cognitive flexibility |
Cognitive flexibility (i.e., the ability to control and redirect attention) will be assessed with the Card Sorting task in which children will sort cards by color and then shape on an iPad as part of the freely accessible Early Years Toolbox. For the Card Sorting task, investigators tend to review the accuracy of Block 1 (pre-switch) and Block 2 (post-switch). Since a post-switch accuracy score intends to index the extent to which a child could successfully switch from one sorting rule to the next, investigators will swap the two scores if the post-switch accuracy is larger than the pre-switch accuracy. This ensures that final post-switch scores (Block 2 + Block 3) reflects the child's ability to successfully switch between sorting rules. |
Baseline (week 0) and post-intervention (week 5) |
|