Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Withdrawn

Administrative data

NCT number NCT02994589
Other study ID # 5150267
Secondary ID
Status Withdrawn
Phase Phase 4
First received August 31, 2015
Last updated December 13, 2016
Start date October 2016
Est. completion date December 2016

Study information

Verified date December 2016
Source Loma Linda University
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority United States: Institutional Review Board
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The investigators objective is to compare OASIS wound matrix with other commonly used dressings available for the donor site in split thickness skin grafting in order to determine which dressing provides the best outcome based on pain level, time to healing and aesthetic outcome.


Description:

Investigators seek to compare Oasis wound matrix with Tegaderm and Xeroform in order to determine whether advantages exist in one or more of the dressing types that are approved and currently used for split-thickness skin graft donor site dressings.

Patients will be randomly assigned to one of the three treatment groups and followed up post-operatively and treated as per current standard of care.

Data to be collected and analyzed includes: patient age, co-morbid illnesses, medication, skin-graft donor location, skin-graft donor area, STSG thickness, infection rate, complications involving the donor site, post-operative pain score every morning until hospital discharge, healing rate, photographs of the donor site immediately post-operatively and then at routine follow-up appointments.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Withdrawn
Enrollment 0
Est. completion date December 2016
Est. primary completion date December 2016
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender Both
Age group 18 Years to 80 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- patients scheduled to undergo split thickness skin grafting

- patients able to consent without a proxy

Exclusion Criteria:

- confounding medical conditions

- previous skin grafting from site

- prior use of biological skin substitute on site

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Factorial Assignment, Masking: Single Blind (Subject), Primary Purpose: Treatment


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Other:
Tegaderm™(Absorbant, 3M)
3M™ Tegaderm™ Dressing helps provide the natural moisture balance conducive to wound healing.
Device:
OASIS® wound matrix
OASIS® Matrix is indicated for the management of wounds including: partial- and full-thickness wounds, pressure ulcers, venous ulcers, chronic vascular ulcers, diabetic ulcers, trauma wounds (abrasions, lacerations, second-degree burns, skin tears), draining wounds, surgical wounds (donor sites/grafts, post-Mohs' surgery, post-laser surgery, podiatric, wound dehiscence).
Other:
Xeroform™
Xeroform™ consists of a fine-mesh gauze impregnated with bismuth tribromophenate.

Locations

Country Name City State
n/a

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Loma Linda University

References & Publications (4)

Eskes AM, Brölmann FE, Gerbens LA, Ubbink DT, Vermeulen H; REMBRANDT study group.. Which dressing do donor site wounds need?: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2011 Oct 17;12:229. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-12-229. — View Citation

Fernandes de Carvalho V, Paggiaro AO, Isaac C, Gringlas J, Ferreira MC. Clinical trial comparing 3 different wound dressings for the management of partial-thickness skin graft donor sites. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2011 Nov-Dec;38(6):643-7. doi: 10. — View Citation

Hankin CS, Knispel J, Lopes M, Bronstone A, Maus E. Clinical and cost efficacy of advanced wound care matrices for venous ulcers. J Manag Care Pharm. 2012 Jun;18(5):375-84. Review. — View Citation

Mostow EN, Haraway GD, Dalsing M, Hodde JP, King D; OASIS Venus Ulcer Study Group.. Effectiveness of an extracellular matrix graft (OASIS Wound Matrix) in the treatment of chronic leg ulcers: a randomized clinical trial. J Vasc Surg. 2005 May;41(5):837-43 — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Time to Heal Patient will be followed up during routine post-operative appointments at the clinic weekly to check the healing process of the donor site wound. 7-21 days No
Secondary Aesthetic Outcome During routine followup visits to the clinic, the donor site aesthetic outcome will be observed and recorded clinically and digitally (photographs). The Vancouver Scar Scale will be used. 1-12 weeks No
Secondary Pain intensity measure Self reported pain intensity in the morning and evening with activity over the past 7 days. Each item is scored on a scale of 0-10 (0= no pain, 10= highest intensity of pain) 7 days No
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Not yet recruiting NCT06134843 - Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of DERMASEAL for the Treatment of Split-Thickness Skin Graft Donor Site Wounds Phase 1/Phase 2
Terminated NCT03937765 - The Effect of Platelet Rich Plasma on Pain at Skin Graft Donor Sites N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT05367726 - The Contributions of the Multidisciplinary Management of Prosthesis Knee Infections in a Reference Center: A Retrospective Study About 52 Cases.Skin Coverage in a Reference Center: A Retrospective Study About 52 Cases
Not yet recruiting NCT06379724 - Burn Study- Tranexamic Acid Versus Thrombin in Split Thickness Skin Graft Phase 4
Terminated NCT04014400 - Suprathel Versus Xeroform for the Management of Skin Graft Donor Sites N/A
Recruiting NCT04648267 - Factors Affecting Split Thickness Skin Graft Success Rates in Patients Who Underwent a Radial Forearm or Fibula Free Flap N/A
Withdrawn NCT03548610 - Efficacy and Safety of a Nanofat-seeded Biological Scaffold in Healing Lower Limb Surgical Defects N/A
Completed NCT04231305 - Antithrombotics and Complications in Skin Grafts
Recruiting NCT05447793 - Effectiveness and Tolerability of Fitostimoline Plus vs Connettivina Bio Plus in Skin Graft
Completed NCT06170424 - Retrospective Analysis of Spray Skin Treats for Severe Burns
Recruiting NCT04186273 - Clinical Safety and Scar Prevention Study of a Topical Antifibrotic Compound FS2. Phase 2