Skin Care Clinical Trial
Official title:
A Human Repeat Insult Patch Test (HRIPT) in Healthy Subjects to Assess the Cutaneous Irritation and Sensitization Potential of a Cosmetic Facial Product
NCT number | NCT03175562 |
Other study ID # | 207585 |
Secondary ID | |
Status | Completed |
Phase | N/A |
First received | |
Last updated | |
Start date | March 27, 2017 |
Est. completion date | May 19, 2017 |
Verified date | June 2018 |
Source | GlaxoSmithKline |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
The objective of this clinical study is to assess the irritation and sensitisation potential of a cosmetic test product after repeated semi-occlusive patch applications to healthy human participants by following a conventional HRIPT methodology under supervision of a dermatologist.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 272 |
Est. completion date | May 19, 2017 |
Est. primary completion date | May 19, 2017 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years to 65 Years |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Demonstrates understanding of the study procedures, restrictions and willingness to participate as evidenced by voluntary written informed consent and has received a signed and dated copy of the informed consent form - Good general and mental health with, in the opinion of the investigator or medically qualified designee no clinically significant and relevant abnormalities in medical history or upon physical examination - Healthy, intact skin at the proposed application site; dorsum (scapular region) - Clinical assessment for eligibility (at Visit 1 and Visit 2 - if not combined) by a dermatologist to ensure participant is free of clinically relevant dermatological conditions - Fitzpatrick phototype I to IV - Agreement to comply with the procedures and requirements of the study and to attend the scheduled assessment visits Exclusion Criteria: - Women who are known to be pregnant or who are intending to become pregnant over the duration of the study - Women who are breast-feeding - Any history of significant dermatological diseases or conditions or medical conditions known to alter skin appearance or physiologic response (e.g. diabetes,) which could, in the opinion of the Investigator, preclude topical application of the investigational products and/or interfere with the evaluation of the test site reaction - Presence of open sores, pimples, or cysts at the application site - Active dermatosis (local or disseminated) that might interfere with the results of the study - Considered immune compromised - History of diseases aggravated or triggered by ultraviolet radiation - Participants with dermatographism - Currently using any medication which in the opinion of the investigator, may affect the evaluation of the study product, or place the participant at undue risk - Use of the following topical or systemic medications: immunosuppressants, antihistamines, non-hormonal anti-inflammatory drugs, and corticosteroids up to 2 weeks before screening visit - Oral or topical treatment with vitamin A acid and/or its derivatives up to 1 month before the screening visit - Intention of being vaccinated during the study period or has been vaccinated within 3 weeks of the screening visit - Currently receiving allergy injections, or received an allergy injection within 7 days prior to Visit 1, or expects to begin injections during study participation - Previous history of atopy, allergic reactions, irritation or intense discomfort feelings to topical-use products, cosmetics or medication - Study participants with a history of allergy to the study material/product, hypoallergenic tape, or to the cotton patches - History of sensitisation in a previous patch study - Participation in another clinical study (including cosmetic studies) or receipt of an investigational drug within 30 days of the screening visit - Previous participation in this study - Recent history (within the last 5 years) of alcohol or other substance abuse - Intense sunlight exposure or sun tanning sessions up to 30 days before the Screening evaluation - Intention of bathing (in the sea or a pool), sauna, water sports, or activities that lead to intense sweating - Any participant who, in the judgment of the Investigator, should not participate in the study - Any skin marks on the test site that might interfere with the evaluation of possible skin reactions (e.g. pigmentation disorders, vascular malformations, scars, tattoos, excessive hair, numerous freckles) - Prisoner or involuntary incarcerated participant - Participant from an indigenous tribe - An employee of the sponsor or the study site or members of their immediate family |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Brazil | GSK Investigational Site | Valinhos |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
GlaxoSmithKline |
Brazil,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Combined Skin Irritation (Dermal Response) and Superficial Irritation (Other Effects) Scores at Induction Phase at Day 3 | A trained assessor assessed all patch sites. The following scores were used to express the response observed at the time of examination: 0=No evidence of irritation, 1=Minimal erythema; barely perceptible, 2=Definite erythema, readily visible; or minimal edema; or minimal papular response, 3=Erythema and papules, 4=Definite edema, 5=Erythema, edema, and papules, 6=Vesicular eruption, 7=Strong reaction spreading beyond test site. Other features indicative irritation (Superficial irritation) scores were: Grade A/Score 0=Slight glazed appearance, Grade B/Score 1=Marked glazing, Grade C/Score 2=Glazing with peeling and cracking, Grade F/Score 3=Glazing with fissures, Grade G/Score 3=Film of dried serous exudate covering all or portion of the patch, Grade H/Score 3=Small petechial erosions and/or scabs. Superficial irritation scores were only provided if there was a dermal response score >0. Full range was 0-10. Lower score indicates better tolerability. | At Day 3 | |
Primary | Combined Skin Irritation (Dermal Response) and Superficial Irritation (Other Effects) Scores at Induction Phase at Day 5 | A trained assessor assessed all patch sites. The following scores were used to express the response observed at the time of examination: 0=No evidence of irritation, 1=Minimal erythema; barely perceptible, 2=Definite erythema, readily visible; or minimal edema; or minimal papular response, 3=Erythema and papules, 4=Definite edema, 5=Erythema, edema, and papules, 6=Vesicular eruption, 7=Strong reaction spreading beyond test site. Other features indicative irritation (Superficial irritation) scores were: Grade A/Score 0=Slight glazed appearance, Grade B/Score 1=Marked glazing, Grade C/Score 2=Glazing with peeling and cracking, Grade F/Score 3=Glazing with fissures, Grade G/Score 3=Film of dried serous exudate covering all or portion of the patch, Grade H/Score 3=Small petechial erosions and/or scabs. Superficial irritation scores were only provided if there was a dermal response score >0. Full range was 0-10. Lower score indicates better tolerability. | At Day 5 | |
Primary | Combined Skin Irritation (Dermal Response) and Superficial Irritation (Other Effects) Scores at Induction Phase at Day 8 | A trained assessor assessed all patch sites. The following scores were used to express the response observed at the time of examination: 0=No evidence of irritation, 1=Minimal erythema; barely perceptible, 2=Definite erythema, readily visible; or minimal edema; or minimal papular response, 3=Erythema and papules, 4=Definite edema, 5=Erythema, edema, and papules, 6=Vesicular eruption, 7=Strong reaction spreading beyond test site. Other features indicative irritation (Superficial irritation) scores were: Grade A/Score 0=Slight glazed appearance, Grade B/Score 1=Marked glazing, Grade C/Score 2=Glazing with peeling and cracking, Grade F/Score 3=Glazing with fissures, Grade G/Score 3=Film of dried serous exudate covering all or portion of the patch, Grade H/Score 3=Small petechial erosions and/or scabs. Superficial irritation scores were only provided if there was a dermal response score >0. Full range was 0-10. Lower score indicates better tolerability. | At Day 8 | |
Primary | Combined Skin Irritation (Dermal Response) and Superficial Irritation (Other Effects) Scores at Induction Phase at Day 10 | A trained assessor assessed all patch sites. The following scores were used to express the response observed at the time of examination: 0=No evidence of irritation, 1=Minimal erythema; barely perceptible, 2=Definite erythema, readily visible; or minimal edema; or minimal papular response, 3=Erythema and papules, 4=Definite edema, 5=Erythema, edema, and papules, 6=Vesicular eruption, 7=Strong reaction spreading beyond test site. Other features indicative irritation (Superficial irritation) scores were: Grade A/Score 0=Slight glazed appearance, Grade B/Score 1=Marked glazing, Grade C/Score 2=Glazing with peeling and cracking, Grade F/Score 3=Glazing with fissures, Grade G/Score 3=Film of dried serous exudate covering all or portion of the patch, Grade H/Score 3=Small petechial erosions and/or scabs. Superficial irritation scores were only provided if there was a dermal response score >0. Full range was 0-10. Lower score indicates better tolerability. | At Day 10 | |
Primary | Combined Skin Irritation (Dermal Response) and Superficial Irritation (Other Effects) Scores at Induction Phase at Day 12 | A trained assessor assessed all patch sites. The following scores were used to express the response observed at the time of examination: 0=No evidence of irritation, 1=Minimal erythema; barely perceptible, 2=Definite erythema, readily visible; or minimal edema; or minimal papular response, 3=Erythema and papules, 4=Definite edema, 5=Erythema, edema, and papules, 6=Vesicular eruption, 7=Strong reaction spreading beyond test site. Other features indicative irritation (Superficial irritation) scores were: Grade A/Score 0=Slight glazed appearance, Grade B/Score 1=Marked glazing, Grade C/Score 2=Glazing with peeling and cracking, Grade F/Score 3=Glazing with fissures, Grade G/Score 3=Film of dried serous exudate covering all or portion of the patch, Grade H/Score 3=Small petechial erosions and/or scabs. Superficial irritation scores were only provided if there was a dermal response score >0. Full range was 0-10. Lower score indicates better tolerability. | At Day 12 | |
Primary | Combined Skin Irritation (Dermal Response) and Superficial Irritation (Other Effects) Scores at Induction Phase at Day 15 | A trained assessor assessed all patch sites. The following scores were used to express the response observed at the time of examination: 0=No evidence of irritation, 1=Minimal erythema; barely perceptible, 2=Definite erythema, readily visible; or minimal edema; or minimal papular response, 3=Erythema and papules, 4=Definite edema, 5=Erythema, edema, and papules, 6=Vesicular eruption, 7=Strong reaction spreading beyond test site. Other features indicative irritation (Superficial irritation) scores were: Grade A/Score 0=Slight glazed appearance, Grade B/Score 1=Marked glazing, Grade C/Score 2=Glazing with peeling and cracking, Grade F/Score 3=Glazing with fissures, Grade G/Score 3=Film of dried serous exudate covering all or portion of the patch, Grade H/Score 3=Small petechial erosions and/or scabs. Superficial irritation scores were only provided if there was a dermal response score >0. Full range was 0-10. Lower score indicates better tolerability. | At Day 15 | |
Primary | Combined Skin Irritation (Dermal Response) and Superficial Irritation (Other Effects) Scores at Induction Phase at Day 17 | A trained assessor assessed all patch sites. The following scores were used to express the response observed at the time of examination: 0=No evidence of irritation, 1=Minimal erythema; barely perceptible, 2=Definite erythema, readily visible; or minimal edema; or minimal papular response, 3=Erythema and papules, 4=Definite edema, 5=Erythema, edema, and papules, 6=Vesicular eruption, 7=Strong reaction spreading beyond test site. Other features indicative irritation (Superficial irritation) scores were: Grade A/Score 0=Slight glazed appearance, Grade B/Score 1=Marked glazing, Grade C/Score 2=Glazing with peeling and cracking, Grade F/Score 3=Glazing with fissures, Grade G/Score 3=Film of dried serous exudate covering all or portion of the patch, Grade H/Score 3=Small petechial erosions and/or scabs. Superficial irritation scores were only provided if there was a dermal response score >0. Full range was 0-10. Lower score indicates better tolerability. | At Day 17 | |
Primary | Combined Skin Irritation (Dermal Response) and Superficial Irritation (Other Effects) Scores at Induction Phase at Day 19 | A trained assessor assessed all patch sites. The following scores were used to express the response observed at the time of examination: 0=No evidence of irritation, 1=Minimal erythema; barely perceptible, 2=Definite erythema, readily visible; or minimal edema; or minimal papular response, 3=Erythema and papules, 4=Definite edema, 5=Erythema, edema, and papules, 6=Vesicular eruption, 7=Strong reaction spreading beyond test site. Other features indicative irritation (Superficial irritation) scores were: Grade A/Score 0=Slight glazed appearance, Grade B/Score 1=Marked glazing, Grade C/Score 2=Glazing with peeling and cracking, Grade F/Score 3=Glazing with fissures, Grade G/Score 3=Film of dried serous exudate covering all or portion of the patch, Grade H/Score 3=Small petechial erosions and/or scabs. Superficial irritation scores were only provided if there was a dermal response score >0. Full range was 0-10. Lower score indicates better tolerability. | At Day 19 | |
Primary | Combined Skin Irritation (Dermal Response) and Superficial Irritation (Other Effects) Scores at Challenge Phase at Week 6 After 30 Minutes (Maximum 1 Hour) Post Patch Removal | A trained assessor assessed all patch sites. The following scores were used to express the response observed at the time of examination: 0=No evidence of irritation, 1=Minimal erythema; barely perceptible, 2=Definite erythema, readily visible; or minimal edema; or minimal papular response, 3=Erythema and papules, 4=Definite edema, 5=Erythema, edema, and papules, 6=Vesicular eruption, 7=Strong reaction spreading beyond test site. Other features indicative irritation (Superficial irritation) scores were: Grade A/Score 0=Slight glazed appearance, Grade B/Score 1=Marked glazing, Grade C/Score 2=Glazing with peeling and cracking, Grade F/Score 3=Glazing with fissures, Grade G/Score 3=Film of dried serous exudate covering all or portion of the patch, Grade H/Score 3=Small petechial erosions and/or scabs. Superficial irritation scores were only provided if there was a dermal response score >0. Full range was 0-10. Lower score indicates better tolerability. | At Week 6 after 30 minutes (maximum 1 hour) post patch removal | |
Primary | Combined Skin Irritation (Dermal Response) and Superficial Irritation (Other Effects) Scores at Challenge Phase at Week 6 After 24 (±2) Hours Post Patch Removal | A trained assessor assessed all patch sites. The following scores were used to express the response observed at the time of examination: 0=No evidence of irritation, 1=Minimal erythema; barely perceptible, 2=Definite erythema, readily visible; or minimal edema; or minimal papular response, 3=Erythema and papules, 4=Definite edema, 5=Erythema, edema, and papules, 6=Vesicular eruption, 7=Strong reaction spreading beyond test site. Other features indicative irritation (Superficial irritation) scores were: Grade A/Score 0=Slight glazed appearance, Grade B/Score 1=Marked glazing, Grade C/Score 2=Glazing with peeling and cracking, Grade F/Score 3=Glazing with fissures, Grade G/Score 3=Film of dried serous exudate covering all or portion of the patch, Grade H/Score 3=Small petechial erosions and/or scabs. Superficial irritation scores were only provided if there was a dermal response score >0. Full range was 0-10. Lower score indicates better tolerability. | At Week 6 after 24 (±2) hours post patch removal | |
Primary | Combined Skin Irritation (Dermal Response) and Superficial Irritation (Other Effects) Scores at Challenge Phase at 6 Week 48 (±2) Hours, Post Patch Removal | A trained assessor assessed all patch sites. The following scores were used to express the response observed at the time of examination: 0=No evidence of irritation, 1=Minimal erythema; barely perceptible, 2=Definite erythema, readily visible; or minimal edema; or minimal papular response, 3=Erythema and papules, 4=Definite edema, 5=Erythema, edema, and papules, 6=Vesicular eruption, 7=Strong reaction spreading beyond test site. Other features indicative irritation (Superficial irritation) scores were: Grade A/Score 0=Slight glazed appearance, Grade B/Score 1=Marked glazing, Grade C/Score 2=Glazing with peeling and cracking, Grade F/Score 3=Glazing with fissures, Grade G/Score 3=Film of dried serous exudate covering all or portion of the patch, Grade H/Score 3=Small petechial erosions and/or scabs. Superficial irritation scores were only provided if there was a dermal response score >0. Full range was 0-10. Lower score indicates better tolerability. | At Week 6 after 48 (±2) hours post patch removal |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT03302559 -
Study to Assess the Cosmetic Changes in the Facial Skin After Use of a Topical Retinoid Product in Participants With Moderate to Severe Photodamage
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04510103 -
A Controlled Clinical Study of 2 Different Moisturizers for the Relief of Dry Skin
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04972747 -
The Effect of Skin Care Applied With Two Different Oils on Skin Integrity and Growth Parameters in Premature Babies
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03640832 -
A Clinical Study to Investigate the Dermal and Ocular Tolerance of a Developmental Cosmetic Facial Serum Formulation in Healthy Females With Sensitive Skin
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04557371 -
A Study to Assess the Local Cutaneous and Ocular Tolerance of Three Developmental Facial Skin-care Formulations.
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03824886 -
Enhancing SKIN Health and Safety in Aged CARE
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03402373 -
Evaluation of the Nutritional Supplement Lycoderm on Its Impact on Skin Parameters
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03119688 -
To Assess the Mildness of a Cosmetic Cleanser in Healthy Participants Using the Forearm-Controlled Application Technique (FCAT)
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05005611 -
Probiotics Regulates Skin Care in Children
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05337670 -
Probiotics Regulates Skin Care in Children
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05888311 -
Evaluation of the Protection of a Liquid Bandage
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05876546 -
Evaluation of Skin Irritancy and Sensitization of a Liquid Bandage
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03233009 -
To Investigate Primary Irritation Potential of Four Skin Serum Products on Human Subjects Assessed by 24 Hour Patch Test
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02106403 -
A Study to Evaluate the Cooling Sensation and Consumer Liking of a Skin Disinfectant Spray
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03192592 -
Safety and Effectiveness Evaluation of the Apotech® Diabetic Body Moisturizer
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03103906 -
Evaluation of the Cosmetic Benefit of a Skin Cream in Healthy Females With Mild to Advanced Photo-damaged Facial Skin Who Have Undergone a Glycolic Acid Facial Peel Procedure
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03183518 -
To Assess the Photosensitisation and Photoallergy Potential of a Cosmetic Facial Product in Healthy Participants
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05266209 -
Comparison of Coconut and Sunflower Oil Application in Preserving Babies' Skin Integrity
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05738018 -
Evaluating Patient Experiences in Skin Care Clinical Studies
|
||
Completed |
NCT02603029 -
Influence of of Cream With the Silver Fir Wood Extract (Belinal) on Skin
|
N/A |