Sinusitis, Acute Clinical Trial
Official title:
Treatment of Acute Sinusitis With High-Dose vs. Standard-Dose Amoxicillin/Clavulanate: A Confirmation Study
Verified date | July 2021 |
Source | Albany Medical College |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
Comparative-effectiveness study of the treatment of acute bacterial sinusitis with amoxicillin/clavulanate 875mg/125mg bid for 7 days with or without the addition of immediate-release amoxicillin 875 mg bid x 7 days. .
Status | Terminated |
Enrollment | 157 |
Est. completion date | May 31, 2020 |
Est. primary completion date | May 31, 2020 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: 1. Adults 18 and older who are patients at the Albany Medical Center Internal Medicine and Pediatrics practice (study site). 2. Clinical diagnosis of acute bacterial sinusitis in accordance with the guidelines of the Infectious Disease Society of America (fitting into one of 3 categories: persistent sinus symptoms for 10 days or more; severe sinus symptoms for 3 days or more; or worsening sinus symptoms after initial improvement (double sickening). Exclusion Criteria: 1. Previous enrollment in the current study 2. Allergy or intolerance to any penicillin or to amoxicillin/clavulanate 3. Serious hypersensitivity reaction to any beta lactam 4. Elevated risk of amoxicillin-resistant bacteria: a. amoxicillin, penicillin, or other beta-lactam within the past month; b. known to have had methicillin-resistant Staph aureus 5. Chronic or recurrent "sinus" problems (defined as a) persistent symptoms of "sinus" congestion, not attributed to nasal allergies, for 8 weeks or more or b) 2 or more episodes of antibiotic-treated "sinusitis" in past 3 months 6. Need to use high-dose amoxicillin/clavulanate or levofloxacin or to send to emergency department or to hospitalize because of a) signs of severe infection or b) immunocompromise 7. Cognitive impairment, so unable to give reliable symptom ratings (even if a health proxy can give consent) 8. Pregnant women and nursing mothers 9. Drug warnings: a) taking allopurinol; b) current mononucleosis; c) chronic kidney disease stage 4 (estimated glomerular filtration rate <30); d) hepatic impairment (not including isolated transaminase elevated < 2 times upper limit of normal); e) history of antibiotic-associated colitis (C. difficile) |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United States | Albany Medical Center Internal Medicine and Pediatrics | Cohoes | New York |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Paul Sorum, MD |
United States,
Canafax DM, Yuan Z, Chonmaitree T, Deka K, Russlie HQ, Giebink GS. Amoxicillin middle ear fluid penetration and pharmacokinetics in children with acute otitis media. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1998 Feb;17(2):149-56. — View Citation
Chow AW, Benninger MS, Brook I, Brozek JL, Goldstein EJ, Hicks LA, Pankey GA, Seleznick M, Volturo G, Wald ER, File TM Jr; Infectious Diseases Society of America. IDSA clinical practice guideline for acute bacterial rhinosinusitis in children and adults. Clin Infect Dis. 2012 Apr;54(8):e72-e112. doi: 10.1093/cid/cir1043. Epub 2012 Mar 20. — View Citation
Lemiengre MB, van Driel ML, Merenstein D, Young J, De Sutter AI. Antibiotics for clinically diagnosed acute rhinosinusitis in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Oct 17;10:CD006089. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006089.pub4. Review. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 10;9:CD006089. — View Citation
Wald ER, Nash D, Eickhoff J. Effectiveness of amoxicillin/clavulanate potassium in the treatment of acute bacterial sinusitis in children. Pediatrics. 2009 Jul;124(1):9-15. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-2902. — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Other | Number of Participants Reporting Any Diarrhea at Day 3 Among Those Self-identified as Prone or Not Prone to Diarrhea | Among those who indicated at enrollment whether prone to diarrhea or not, the number giving ratings of 1, 2, or 3 on diarrhea scale ranging from 0 (none) to 3 (severe) | At the end of 3 days | |
Other | Number of Participants Reporting Severe Diarrhea at Day 3 Among Those Self-identified as Prone or Not Prone to Diarrhea | Among those reporting proneness to diarrhea or not at enrollment, the number rating 3 on diarrhea scale ranging from 0 (none) to 3 (severe) | At end of day 3 | |
Other | Number of Participants Reporting Any Diarrhea at Day 10 Among Those Self-identified as Prone or Not Prone to Diarrhea | Among those indicating at enrollment a proneness or not to diarrhea, the number giving ratings of 1, 2, or 3 on the diarrhea scale ranging from 0 (none) to 3 (severe) | At 10 days since enrollment | |
Other | Number of Participants Reporting Severe Diarrhea at Day 10 Among Those Self-identified as Prone or Not Prone to Diarrhea | Among those indicating proneness to diarrhea or not at enrollment, the number who gave a rating of 3 on the diarrhea scale ranging from 0 (none) to 3 (severe) | At 10 days since enrollment | |
Other | Number of Female Participants Reporting Any Vaginal Symptoms at Day 3 Among Those Self-identified as Prone or Not Prone to Vaginal Itching or Discharge | Female participants contacted after 3 days of treatment were divided into two groups: those who had or had not reported at baseline a proneness to vaginal symptoms. The measure was the number in each group who gave ratings of 1, 2, or 3 on the vaginal symptoms scale, ranging from 0 (none) to 3 (severe), with a higher score indicating more severe symptoms. | After 3 days of treatment | |
Other | Number of Female Participants Reporting Severe Vaginal Symptoms at Day 3 Among Those Self-identified as Prone or Not Prone to Vaginal Itching or Discharge | Among female participants indicating a proneness or not to vaginal itching or discharge, the number of ratings of 3 on the vaginal symptom scale ranging from 0 (none) to 3 (severe)Female participants contacted after 3 days of treatment were divided into two groups: those who had or had not reported at baseline a proneness to vaginal symptoms. The measure was the number in each group who gave a rating of 1, 3 on the vaginal symptoms scale, ranging from 0 (none) to 3 (severe), with a higher score indicating more severe symptoms. | At the end of 3 days of treatment | |
Other | Number of Female Participants Reporting Any Vaginal Symptoms at Day 10 Among Those Self-identified as Prone or Not Prone to Vaginal Itching or Discharge | Female participants contacted after 10 days since enrollment were divided into two groups: those who had or had not reported at baseline a proneness to vaginal symptoms. The measure was the number in each group who gave ratings of 1, 2, or 3 on the vaginal symptoms scale, ranging from 0 (none) to 3 (severe), with a higher score indicating more severe symptoms. | At 10 days since enrollment | |
Other | Number of Female Participants Reporting Severe Vaginal Symptoms at Day 10 Among Those Self-identified as Prone or Not Prone to Vaginal Itching or Discharge | Female participants contacted at 10 days since enrollment were divided into two groups: those who had or had not reported at baseline a proneness to vaginal symptoms. The measure was the number in each group who gave rating of 3 on the vaginal symptoms scale, ranging from 0 (none) to 3 (severe), with a higher score indicating more severe symptoms. | At 10 days since enrollment | |
Primary | Number of Participants With a Global Rating of Improvement of 5 & 6 at the End of 3 Days of Treatment | Rating on a scale of 1=a lot worse, 2=a little worse, 3=the same, 4=a little better, 5=a lot better, 6=no symptoms, with a higher score indicating greater improvement. | At end of 3 days of treatment | |
Secondary | Number of Participants With a Global Rating of Improvement of 5 or 6 at End of 10 Days Since Enrollment | Rating of 5 (a lot better) or 6 (no symptoms) on Global Rating of Improvement scale, with range of 1 (a lot worse) to 6 (no symptoms), with a higher score indicating greater improvement | At end of 10 days since enrollment | |
Secondary | Change From Baseline in the Total Score on the Sinonasal Outcome Test-16 (SNOT-16) at the End of 3 Days of Treatment | The change between enrollment and the end of 3 days of treatment in the total score on the Sinonasal Outcome Test-16 (SNOT-16). The total SNOT-16 is the sum of the participant's ratings of 16 symptoms of illness on the scale of 0 (no problem) to 3 (severe problem), with a possible range of 0 to 48, with a higher sum indicating more troubling symptoms. A decrease in total score would indicate an improvement in symptoms. | At end of 3 days of treatment | |
Secondary | Change From Baseline in the Total Score on the Sinonasal Outcome Test-16 (SNOT-16) at the End of 10 Days Since Enrollment | The change between enrollment and the end of 10 days since enrollment in the total score on the Sinonasal Outcome Test-16 (SNOT-16). The total SNOT-16 is the sum of the participant's ratings of 16 symptoms of illness on the scale of 0 (no problem) to 3 (severe problem), with a possible range of 0 to 48, with a higher sum indicating more troubling symptoms. A decrease in total score would indicate an improvement in symptoms. | At end of 10 days since enrollment | |
Secondary | Balance of Benefits and Detriments | Assessment of balance between good effects and bad effects of antibiotic on scale of -3=bad effects much greater than good effects to +3=good effects much greater than bad effects | At end of 10 days since enrollment | |
Secondary | Number of Participants Answering "Yes" to Willingness to Take the Antibiotic Again in the Future | Response of "yes" at the end of 10 days since enrollment to the question whether the participant would take this antibiotic again, with possible answers of yes, no, or uncertain. | At end of 10 days since enrollment |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT03729258 -
Efficacy and Safety of Modified Release Cefpodoxime Formulation in the Treatment of Acute Sinusitis.
|
Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04241016 -
Endoscopic Sinus Surgery in Recurrent Acute Rhinosinusitis
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05924711 -
"Association of Peri-implantitis and Maxillary Sinusitis: a Case-control Study".
|
||
Completed |
NCT01018030 -
Dose Finding Study of Fluticasone Furoate Nasal Spray for Uncomplicated Acute Rhinosinusitis
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT01934231 -
Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Potassium Clavulanate/Amoxicillin in Children With Acute Bacterial Rhinosinusitis
|
Phase 3 |