Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT04755257
Other study ID # 2019-367
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase
First received
Last updated
Start date November 15, 2019
Est. completion date May 15, 2020

Study information

Verified date February 2021
Source Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Observational

Clinical Trial Summary

Today, the most commonly used position is the seated position with 45° of shoulder abduction (Abd) in the scapular plane, known as the most functional isokinetic assessment of shoulder-rotator strength (1). However, considering the architectural feature of the rotator muscles, a position where the maximum sarcomere length is obtained, in which the maximum muscle strength is produced, has not been investigated. Ward et al. showed that the shoulder position, in which the sarcomere length of the muscles was between 2.0 - 2.6 µm, was 25⁰ Abd and 20⁰ external rotation (ER) as a result of their study on the rotator cuff muscles architecture (2). The test position selected in isokinetic measurements is the main factor for outcome measurements and the repeatability of the measurements directly depends on the selected position (3). This study was planned to investigate the effects of the position where the shoulder is at 25⁰ Abd and 20⁰ ER to develop the most suitable isokinetic strength evaluation position based on muscle architecture for shoulder rotator muscles.Using IsoMed 2000 device (D. & R. Ferstl GmbH, Hemau, Germany) we conducted the isokinetic test of concentric (CON) and eccentric (ECC) shoulder internal (IR) and external (ER) strength at the angular velocity of 60˚/s in both Method I (scapular position) and Method II (25⁰ Abd and 20⁰ ER). There were seven days between the testing sessions, and both tests were conducted at the same time of day. The same examiner with experience in performing isokinetic testing with IsoMed 2000 tested all subjects in both testing sessions


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 52
Est. completion date May 15, 2020
Est. primary completion date January 15, 2020
Accepts healthy volunteers
Gender Male
Age group 18 Years to 25 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - Being between the ages of 18-25 - Body mass index (BMI) being between 18.5-24.9 kg / m 2 - Volunteering to participate in the study - Having the skills to do the tests and exercises to be applied Exclusion Criteria: - Having a history of upper extremity injury within the past year - Having a sensory problem that prevents participation in the study - Have any musculoskeletal, neurological, respiratory, or cardiovascular risk factors that limit exercise - Having a history of malignant disease

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Device:
Isokinetic test
Using IsoMed 2000 device (D. & R. Ferstl GmbH, Hemau, Germany) we conducted the isokinetic test of concentric (CON) and eccentric (ECC) shoulder internal (IR) and external (ER) strength at the angular velocity of 60°/s in both Method I (scapular position) and Method II (25° Abd and 20° ER). There were seven days between the testing sessions, and both tests were conducted at the same time of day. The same examiner with experience in performing isokinetic testing with IsoMed 2000 tested all subjects in both testing sessions.

Locations

Country Name City State
Turkey Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Ankara Etlik

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Turkey, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary concentric shoulder internal rotation peak torque and peak torque/weight at the angular velocity of 60°/s in Method I (scapular position) concentric shoulder internal rotation peak torque and peak torque/weight at the angular velocity of 60°/s in Method I (scapular position) Six month
Primary concentric shoulder external rotation peak torque and peak torque/weight at the angular velocity of 60°/s in Method I (scapular position) concentric shoulder external rotation peak torque and peak torque/weight at the angular velocity of 60°/s in Method I (scapular position) Six month
Primary concentric shoulder internal rotation peak torque and peak torque/weight at the angular velocity of 60°/s in Method II (25° Abd and 20° ER) concentric shoulder internal rotation peak torque and peak torque/weight at the angular velocity of 60°/s in Method II (25° Abd and 20° ER) Six month
Primary concentric shoulder external rotation peak torque and peak torque/weight at the angular velocity of 60°/s in Method II (25° Abd and 20° ER) concentric shoulder external rotation peak torque and peak torque/weight at the angular velocity of 60°/s in Method II (25° Abd and 20° ER) Six month
Primary eccentric shoulder internal rotation peak torque and peak torque/weight at the angular velocity of 60°/s in Method I (scapular position) eccentric shoulder internal rotation peak torque and peak torque/weight at the angular velocity of 60°/s in Method I (scapular position) Six month
Primary eccentric shoulder external rotation peak torque and peak torque/weight at the angular velocity of 60°/s in Method I (scapular position) eccentric shoulder external rotation peak torque and peak torque/weight at the angular velocity of 60°/s in Method I (scapular position) Six month
Primary eccentric shoulder internal rotation peak torque and peak torque/weight at the angular velocity of 60°/s in Method II (25° Abd and 20° ER) eccentric shoulder internal rotation peak torque and peak torque/weight at the angular velocity of 60°/s in Method II (25° Abd and 20° ER) Six month
Primary eccentric shoulder external rotation peak torque and peak torque/weight at the angular velocity of 60°/s in Method II (25° Abd and 20° ER) eccentric shoulder external rotation peak torque and peak torque/weight at the angular velocity of 60°/s in Method II (25° Abd and 20° ER) Six month
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Not yet recruiting NCT06323980 - INHANCE Stemless Reverse Shoulder IDE N/A
Completed NCT00925366 - Which is the Most Reliable Radiologic Examination for the Diagnosis of Rotator Cuff Tendon Tear? N/A
Recruiting NCT04507854 - Return to Performance Criteria Following Shoulder Instability Surgery in the Athlete. N/A
Recruiting NCT06014203 - Examination of Edema After Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery
Completed NCT05096377 - Hemi-diaphragmatic Paresis and Erector Spinae Plane Block
Terminated NCT01544244 - The Global Shoulder Concept (GSC) Method Versus Classic Physical Therapy for Shoulder Tendinitis N/A
Completed NCT00027118 - Morbidity After Diagnosis and Treatment of Breast Cancer Patients
Completed NCT00027105 - Morbidity Following the Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients With Breast Cancer
Recruiting NCT04312529 - Analysis of Shoulder Muscle Activity During Isokinetic Evaluation of Rotators N/A
Recruiting NCT05828797 - Elastography in Patients With Hemiplegia
Not yet recruiting NCT06371833 - PRIMA EU Retrospective & Prospective
Completed NCT00702416 - Ultrasound Guidance for Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block Phase 4
Completed NCT04307745 - Primary Prevention Habits for the Shoulder: Survey of the Sportsman's Entourage
Active, not recruiting NCT03585491 - Shoulder Instability Trial Comparing Arthroscopic Stabilization Benefits Compared With Latarjet Procedure Evaluation N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT05281900 - Investigation of Muscular Activation Levels Around the Scapula and Shoulder in Exercises Which Body Weight is Carried N/A
Completed NCT04513535 - Effects of Manual Therapy on Shoulder Function N/A
Recruiting NCT05214547 - Effectiveness of Focal Vibration in Shoulder Pathology N/A
Completed NCT04273633 - Ultrasound Supraspinatus Tendon Assessment After 448kilohertz Radiofrequency Stimulation in a Sporty Population. N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT04196218 - Driving After Shoulder Surgery N/A
Completed NCT01122732 - Comparison of Pain Relief After Non Stimulating Interscalene Catheter Placement vs Stimulating Catheter Placement in Total Shoulder Arthroplasty. N/A