Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT05772533
Other study ID # SAPB for shoulder surgery
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date May 21, 2023
Est. completion date March 10, 2024

Study information

Verified date March 2024
Source Mansoura University
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Effective analgesia in arthroscopic shoulder surgery is a major concern and is essential for all aspects of the patient's recovery. The aim of this study is to assess the quality of pain relief in patients who will undergo arthroscopic shoulder surgeries receiving either serratus anterior plane block versus PENG block comparing and evaluating the differences between the two techniques.It is hypothesized that PENG block will be comparable to serratus anterior plane block as a promising effective alternative for analgesia for arthroscopic shoulder surgeries with fewer side effects. It is suggested that the PENG block can be safely applied for analgesia.


Description:

Multimodal pain management is recommended for early postoperative pain control in arthroscopic shoulder surgery. Regional anesthesia is preferred in shoulder surgery as an effective means of providing anesthesia and postoperative analgesia.Commonly used techniques for shoulder surgery include interscalene brachial plexus (ISB) blocks, continuous ISB (CISB) blocks, suprascapular nerve blocks (SSB), supraclavicular nerve blocks (SCB), local infiltration (LI), and ISB with adjuvants. Interscalene brachial plexus (ISB) block is considered the analgesic technique of choice for shoulder surgery.Relevant studies have found that ultrasound-guided serratus anterior plane block(SAPB) can achieve good anterior lateral chest wall analgesia by injecting local anesthetics into the anterior saw muscle and blocking the lateral cutaneous branch of intercostal nerve which has a significant analgesic effect.The pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block may be safely applied for both partial anesthesia and analgesia in selected shoulder surgery cases. It did not cause motor block or pulmonary complications, nor result in muscle laxity, blocking only the shoulder and the upper third of the humerus. PENG block has been studied extensively in hip surgeries but its place in shoulder surgeries is not yet clear. Therefore, this study will be conducted to compare efficacy of ultrasound guided serratus anterior plane block with PENG block for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgeries. The aim of this study: The aim of this study is to assess the quality of pain relief in patients who will undergo arthroscopic shoulder surgeries receiving either serratus anterior plane block versus PENG block comparing and evaluating the differences between the two techniques. Sample Size Calculation: Sample size was calculated using Power Analysis and Sample Size software program (PASS) version 11.0.4 for windows (2011) with mean VAS score at 6 h postoperative as the primary outcome. Using the results published by Zhu H, et al 2022 with mean VAS score at 6 h postoperative in serratus group was (1.85 ± 0.59 ) Using a two-sided two-sample unequal-variance t-test., sample size of 44 patients is needed to achieve 90% power to detect 30 % difference in at 6 h postoperative. Using a two-sided hypothesis test with a significance level of 0.05. A10% drop out is considered, so a total of 50 patients will be enrolled (25 in each group) in this study Methods: The study will be conducted in Mansoura university hospital on Fifty patients who will be scheduled for arthroscopic shoulder surgery under general anesthesia. They will be randomly assigned to two equal groups (PENG group and SAPB group) according to computer-generated table of random numbers using the permuted block randomization method. The group allocation will be concealed in sequentially numbered, sealed opaque envelopes which will be opened only after obtaining the written informed consent. A written informed consent will be obtained from all study subjects after ensuring confidentiality. The study protocol will be explained to all patients after enrollment into the study along with VAS after enrollment into the study. Basic demographic characters including age, sex, and weight will be recorded. In both groups, The PENG and SAPB procedures will be performed in the preoperative room under strict aseptic conditions using 30 ml 0.25% bupivacaine. Statistical Methods: The collected data will be coded, processed, and analyzed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences program (version 22) for Windows. Normality of numerical data distribution will be tested by Shapiro- Wilk test. Continuous data of normal distribution will be presented as mean ± standard deviation and compared with the unpaired student's t test. Nonnormally distributed data will be presented as median (range) and compared with the Mann-Whitney U test. Repeated measures ANOVA will be used for comparisons within the same group. Categorical data will be presented as number (percentage) and compared with the Chi-square test. All data will be considered statistically significant if P value is ≤ 0.05.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 50
Est. completion date March 10, 2024
Est. primary completion date February 15, 2024
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years to 65 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) 1 or 2 patients. - Scheduled for elective unilateral shoulder arthroscopy. Exclusion Criteria: - Patient's refusal. - Altered mental status or un-cooperative patients. - History of known sensitivity to the used anesthetics. - Bleeding or coagulation diathesis. - Infection or redness at the injection site. - Significant cardiac dysfunction, hepatic, or renal impairment.

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Procedure:
Serratus anterior plane block
The latissimus dorsi muscle between the midaxillary line and the posterior axillary line will be located under ultrasound guidance. The needle will be inserted into the plane from top to bottom until the serratus anterior surface, and the injectate will be slowly administered.
PENG block
Ultrasound-guided PENG block will be performed under strict aseptic precautions and patient's arm will be placed in external rotation and abducted at 45 degrees. A linear ultrasound probe will be placed longitudinally between the coracoid and the humeral head. After defining the humeral head, the tendon of the subscapular muscle and the deltoid muscle over it, the needle will be inserted using the "in plane" technique. When the needle will have passed through the deltoid muscle and touched the subscapularis tendon, a bone-like hard tissue will be felt and the needle could not be advanced further. The needle tip will be placed Between the deltoid muscle and subscapularis tendon, and the injectate will be slowly administered.

Locations

Country Name City State
Egypt Mansoura University Mansoura

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Mansoura University

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Egypt, 

References & Publications (7)

Casas Reza P, Dieguez Garcia P, Gestal Vazquez M, Sampayo Rodriguez L, Lopez Alvarez S. Pericapsular nerve group block for hip surgery. Minerva Anestesiol. 2020 Apr;86(4):463-465. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.20.14166-X. Epub 2020 Jan 28. No abstract availabl — View Citation

Kapukaya F, Ekinci M, Ciftci B, Atalay YO, Golboyu BE, Kuyucu E, Demiraran Y. Erector spinae plane block vs interscalene brachial plexus block for postoperative analgesia management in patients who underwent shoulder arthroscopy. BMC Anesthesiol. 2022 May — View Citation

Kupeli I, Yazici Kara M. Anesthesia or analgesia? New block for shoulder surgery: pericapsular nerve group block. Braz J Anesthesiol. 2022 Sep-Oct;72(5):669-672. doi: 10.1016/j.bjane.2021.05.009. Epub 2021 Jun 9. — View Citation

Patel MS, Abboud JA, Sethi PM. Perioperative pain management for shoulder surgery: evolving techniques. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020 Nov;29(11):e416-e433. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.04.049. Epub 2020 Jun 9. — View Citation

Sripada R, Bowens C Jr. Regional anesthesia procedures for shoulder and upper arm surgery upper extremity update--2005 to present. Int Anesthesiol Clin. 2012 Winter;50(1):26-46. doi: 10.1097/AIA.0b013e31821a0284. — View Citation

van Erp JHJ, Ostendorf M, Lansdaal JR. Shoulder surgery in beach chair position causing perioperative stroke: Four cases and a review of the literature. J Orthop. 2019 May 27;16(6):493-495. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2019.05.009. eCollection 2019 Nov-Dec. — View Citation

Zhu H, Zhang C, Yan C. The Anesthetic Effect of Ultrasound-Guided Serratus Anterior Plane Block in Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery and Its Effect on Postoperative Analgesia. J Healthc Eng. 2022 Mar 15;2022:8968805. doi: 10.1155/2022/8968805. eCollection 202 — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Visual analogue score (VAS) for pain assessment VAS score from 0 to 10 (0 = no pain and 10 = the worst imaginable pain) will be assessed every two hours for 24 hours after the procedure. Up to 24 hours after the procedure
Secondary First analgesic request The time of the first analgesic request for fentanyl will be recorded. Up to 24 hours after the procedure
Secondary Total analgesic requirements of fentanyl The amount of fentanyl consumption given as a rescue analgesia to patients will be measured all over the 24 hours. Up to 24 hours after the procedure
Secondary Heart rate (HR) HR will be recorded every 30min till the end of the procedure. During the procedure
Secondary Mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) MAP will be recorded every 30min till the end of the procedure. During the procedure
Secondary Adverse effects Pneumothorax, respiratory depression, nausea, vomiting, hematoma, or allergic reactions will be recorded Up to 24 hours after the procedure
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Withdrawn NCT04015284 - Intraoperative Pain and Quality of Surgical Block During Shoulder Surgery Assessed by NOL Index N/A
Completed NCT02284763 - Modeling the Effect of EtCO2 on Cerebral Oxygenation N/A
Completed NCT01229683 - Effects of Interscalene Brachial Plexus Nerve Blocks on the Hand and Forearm N/A
Recruiting NCT04209504 - Evaluating Hemidiaphragmatic Paralysis With Prolonged Neural Blockade From an Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block
Terminated NCT00801138 - The Effect of Dexamethasone on the Duration of Interscalene Nerve Blocks With Ropivacaine or Bupivacaine Phase 2/Phase 3
Not yet recruiting NCT00640380 - A Comparison Between Neurostimulation and Loss of Resistance for Cervical Paravertebral Blocks N/A
Recruiting NCT02125994 - Effect of 0.5% vs 0.375% Ropivacaine on Autonomous Nervous System N/A
Completed NCT05755802 - Shoulder Block Versus Pericapsular Nerve Group Block for Shoulder Surgery N/A
Completed NCT01185457 - Effect of Interscalene Block on Heart Rate Variability (HRV) N/A
Completed NCT00829023 - Efficacy of Surgical Preparation Solutions in Shoulder Surgery N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT04397549 - Cervical Erector Spinae Block for Shoulder Surgery N/A
Completed NCT06396455 - Ultrasound Guided Suprascapular Nerve Block Versus ISB Block in Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery N/A
Completed NCT02322242 - The Effects of Dexamethasone on Low Dose Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block Phase 4
Withdrawn NCT02435251 - Changes in Anthropometry Following Ambulatory Orthopaedic Surgery
Completed NCT01025102 - The Addition of Sufentanil Interscalene Block in Shoulder Surgery Phase 3
Completed NCT04714112 - Low-dose Intravenous Dexamethasone at Different Times as Adjunvants for Brachial Plexus Blocks Phase 4
Completed NCT04769570 - Effect of Interscalene and Suprascapular Nerve Block on Analgesia Consumption After Adhesive Capsulitis Surgery N/A
Completed NCT02074397 - Distant Extrafascial Injection vs Subfascial Injection for Interscalene Block: Acute Pain Outcomes and Rates of Complications N/A
Recruiting NCT03664284 - Does the Disinfection of the Subcutaneous Tissue Reduce the Contamination of the Operative Field by P. Acnes During Primary Shoulder Surgery? N/A
Enrolling by invitation NCT04673344 - Regeneten Patch vs Standard Care in Partial Thickness Rotator Cuff Repair N/A