Shoulder Pain Clinical Trial
— NANOBICEPSOfficial title:
Tenotomy of Biceps' Long Head by Mini-optics in Consultation (Hyperambulatory): What Advantage Compared to the Operating Room?
Mini-optics has been used in orthopedics for a short time. The Nanoscope used in this study is marketed by Arthrex. Its main indications concern knee, elbow, wrist, carp and small joints of long fingers for diagnostic and sometimes therapeutic purposes. Some teams use it to replace expensive radiological examinations and/or difficult to access, in consultation, for diagnostic in the knee, but also for therapeutic for partial meniscectomy with several related publications. The investigators recently published a feasibility study of isolated tenotomy of the biceps with this minimally invasive device in consultation (first indexed article describing this technique). This project is part of the broader context of "In Office" surgery, for which there are many applications. Through the miniaturisation of optics and access to "portable" technologies, surgical procedures can now be performed in consultation ("In Office"). For example: release of the carpal tunnel or ulnar canal to the elbow under ultrasound, partial meniscectomy, removal of foreign body from the elbow in consultation. Indeed, in addition to the technical interest of this innovation for a simple and frequent surgical procedure, it should make it possible to transpose anxiety management for the patient, time-consuming and costly for the institution into a heavy technical platform (operating room) towards a simplified, fast and streamlined approach in consultation. In the scientific literature, other equivalent surgical procedures have already been identified and performed in consultation with various tools (carpal tunnel, ulnar nerve in the elbow, meniscectomy in the knee but also in other surgical specialties such as cataract in ophthalmology) with better patient satisfaction, improved patient journey, reduced costs, an increase in the number of patients treated. The investigators wish to demonstrate the non-inferiority of intraarticular tenotomy of the biceps long head performed in consultation with mini-optics and local anaesthesia compared to the operating room in order to modify practices and optimize the management of patients within the institution while improving their satisfaction.
Status | Recruiting |
Enrollment | 40 |
Est. completion date | May 29, 2025 |
Est. primary completion date | May 29, 2025 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - patient over 18 years-old, - With shoulder pain associated to massive irreparable rotator cuff and a biceps still presents (premature Hamada's stages, 1 to 3); Or with an isolated pathology of biceps with intact rotator cuff (in particular bicipital instability, subluxation, tenosynovitis, pre-rupture) - Indication for tenotomy according orthopedic surgeon - having given written consent after written and oral information, - member of the social security system. Exclusion Criteria: - patient protected by law or under guardianship r curatorship, or not able to participae in a clinical trial under L.1121-16 article of French Public Health Regulations - pregnant or nursing patient, - Allergies to local anesthetics - Athletes - Capsulitis in progress - history of shoulder surgery - Medical history of infection - fracture of proximal end of the humerus - Patient refusal to take part |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
France | CHU de Nice | Nice | Alpes Maritimes |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice |
France,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Demonstrate the non-inferiority of tenotomy of biceps' long head by mini-optics in consultation (hyperambulatory) compared to upon arthroscopy under normal operating condition on pain felt by patient | Pain felt will be assessed with a visual and analog scale for pain. The scale ranges from 0 (no pain) to 10 (maximum thinkable pain). Limit of non-inferiority is fixed to 1.5 on this scale. | At inclusion (V0) | |
Primary | Demonstrate the non-inferiority of tenotomy of biceps' long head by mini-optics in consultation (hyperambulatory) compared to upon arthroscopy under normal operating condition on pain felt by patient | Pain felt will be assessed with a visual and analog scale for pain. The scale ranges from 0 (no pain) to 10 (maximum thinkable pain). Limit of non-inferiority is fixed to 1.5 on this scale. | 3 hours after surgery (V1) | |
Primary | Demonstrate the non-inferiority of tenotomy of biceps' long head by mini-optics in consultation (hyperambulatory) compared to upon arthroscopy under normal operating condition on pain felt by patient | Pain felt will be assessed with a visual and analog scale for pain. The scale ranges from 0 (no pain) to 10 (maximum thinkable pain). Limit of non-inferiority is fixed to 1.5 on this scale. | The day after surgery (V2) | |
Primary | Demonstrate the non-inferiority of tenotomy of biceps' long head by mini-optics in consultation (hyperambulatory) compared to upon arthroscopy under normal operating condition on pain felt by patient | Pain felt will be assessed with a visual and analog scale for pain. The scale ranges from 0 (no pain) to 10 (maximum thinkable pain). Limit of non-inferiority is fixed to 1.5 on this scale. | 2 weeks after surgery (V3) | |
Primary | Demonstrate the non-inferiority of tenotomy of biceps' long head by mini-optics in consultation (hyperambulatory) compared to upon arthroscopy under normal operating condition on pain felt by patient | Pain felt will be assessed with a visual and analog scale for pain. The scale ranges from 0 (no pain) to 10 (maximum thinkable pain). Limit of non-inferiority is fixed to 1.5 on this scale. | 6 weeks after surgery (V4) | |
Primary | Demonstrate the non-inferiority of tenotomy of biceps' long head by mini-optics in consultation (hyperambulatory) compared to upon arthroscopy under normal operating condition on pain felt by patient | Pain felt will be assessed with a visual and analog scale for pain. The scale ranges from 0 (no pain) to 10 (maximum thinkable pain). Limit of non-inferiority is fixed to 1.5 on this scale. | 3 months after surgery (V5) | |
Primary | Demonstrate the non-inferiority of tenotomy of biceps' long head by mini-optics in consultation (hyperambulatory) compared to upon arthroscopy under normal operating condition on pain felt by patient | Pain felt will be assessed with a visual and analog scale for pain. The scale ranges from 0 (no pain) to 10 (maximum thinkable pain). Limit of non-inferiority is fixed to 1.5 on this scale. | 6 months after surgery (V6) | |
Primary | Demonstrate the non-inferiority of tenotomy of biceps' long head by mini-optics in consultation (hyperambulatory) compared to upon arthroscopy under normal operating condition on pain felt by patient | Pain felt will be assessed with a visual and analog scale for pain. The scale ranges from 0 (no pain) to 10 (maximum thinkable pain). Limit of non-inferiority is fixed to 1.5 on this scale. | 12 months after surgery (V7) | |
Secondary | Demonstrate the non-inferiority of tenotomy of biceps' long head by mini-optics in consultation (hyperambulatory) compared to upon arthroscopy under normal operating condition on scare quality, in particular on number of scare | Number of scare will be visually evaluated by investigators | 2 weeks (V3) after surgery | |
Secondary | Demonstrate the non-inferiority of tenotomy of biceps' long head by mini-optics in consultation (hyperambulatory) compared to upon arthroscopy under normal operating condition on scare quality, in particular on number of scare | Number of scare will be visually evaluated by investigators | 6 weeks (V4) after surgery | |
Secondary | Demonstrate the non-inferiority of tenotomy of biceps' long head by mini-optics in consultation (hyperambulatory) compared to upon arthroscopy under normal operating condition on scare quality, in particular on number of scare | Number of scare will be visually evaluated by investigators | 3 months (V5) after surgery | |
Secondary | Demonstrate the non-inferiority of tenotomy of biceps' long head by mini-optics in consultation (hyperambulatory) compared to upon arthroscopy under normal operating condition on scare quality, in particular on number of scare | Number of scare will be visually evaluated by investigators | 6 months (V6) after surgery | |
Secondary | Demonstrate the non-inferiority of tenotomy of biceps' long head by mini-optics in consultation (hyperambulatory) compared to upon arthroscopy under normal operating condition on scare quality, in particular on number of scare | Number of scare will be visually evaluated by investigators | 12 months (V7) after surgery | |
Secondary | Demonstrate the non-inferiority of tenotomy of biceps' long head by mini-optics in consultation (hyperambulatory) compared to upon arthroscopy under normal operating condition on scare quality, in particular on scare's length | Scare's length will be assessed by investigator with a small ruler, in millimeter. | 2 weeks (V3) after surgery | |
Secondary | Demonstrate the non-inferiority of tenotomy of biceps' long head by mini-optics in consultation (hyperambulatory) compared to upon arthroscopy under normal operating condition on scare quality, in particular on scare's length | Scare's length will be assessed by investigator with a small ruler, in millimeter. | 6 weeks after surgery | |
Secondary | Demonstrate the non-inferiority of tenotomy of biceps' long head by mini-optics in consultation (hyperambulatory) compared to upon arthroscopy under normal operating condition on scare quality, in particular on scare's length | Scare's length will be assessed by investigator with a small ruler, in millimeter. | 3 months (V5) after surgery | |
Secondary | Demonstrate the non-inferiority of tenotomy of biceps' long head by mini-optics in consultation (hyperambulatory) compared to upon arthroscopy under normal operating condition on scare quality, in particular on scare's length | Scare's length will be assessed by investigator with a small ruler, in millimeter. | 6 months (V6) after surgery | |
Secondary | Demonstrate the non-inferiority of tenotomy of biceps' long head by mini-optics in consultation (hyperambulatory) compared to upon arthroscopy under normal operating condition on scare quality, in particular on scare's length | Scare's length will be assessed by investigator with a small ruler, in millimeter. | 12 months (V7) after surgery | |
Secondary | Demonstrate the non-inferiority of tenotomy of biceps' long head by mini-optics in consultation (hyperambulatory) compared to upon arthroscopy under normal operating condition on scare quality, in particular on scare's width | Scare's width will be assessed by investigator with a small ruler, in millimeter. | 2 weeks (V3) after surgery | |
Secondary | Demonstrate the non-inferiority of tenotomy of biceps' long head by mini-optics in consultation (hyperambulatory) compared to upon arthroscopy under normal operating condition on scare quality, in particular on scare's width | Scare's width will be assessed by investigator with a small ruler, in millimeter. | 6 weeks (V4) after surgery | |
Secondary | Demonstrate the non-inferiority of tenotomy of biceps' long head by mini-optics in consultation (hyperambulatory) compared to upon arthroscopy under normal operating condition on scare quality, in particular on scare's width | Scare's width will be assessed by investigator with a small ruler, in millimeter. | 3 months (V5) after surgery | |
Secondary | Demonstrate the non-inferiority of tenotomy of biceps' long head by mini-optics in consultation (hyperambulatory) compared to upon arthroscopy under normal operating condition on scare quality, in particular on scare's width | Scare's width will be assessed by investigator with a small ruler, in millimeter. | 6 months (V6) after surgery | |
Secondary | Demonstrate the non-inferiority of tenotomy of biceps' long head by mini-optics in consultation (hyperambulatory) compared to upon arthroscopy under normal operating condition on scare quality, in particular on scare's width | Scare's width will be assessed by investigator with a small ruler, in millimeter. | 12 months (V7) after surgery | |
Secondary | Demonstrate the non-inferiority of tenotomy of biceps' long head by mini-optics in consultation (hyperambulatory) compared to upon arthroscopy under normal operating condition on scare quality, in particular on time to onset | Time to onset will be evaluated by investigator, in number of days. | 2 weeks (V3) after surgery | |
Secondary | Demonstrate the non-inferiority of tenotomy of biceps' long head by mini-optics in consultation (hyperambulatory) compared to upon arthroscopy under normal operating condition on scare quality, in particular on time to onset | Time to onset will be evaluated by investigator, in number of days. | 6 weeks (V4) after surgery | |
Secondary | Demonstrate the non-inferiority of tenotomy of biceps' long head by mini-optics in consultation (hyperambulatory) compared to upon arthroscopy under normal operating condition on scare quality, in particular on time to onset | Time to onset will be evaluated by investigator, in number of days. | 3 months (V5) after surgery | |
Secondary | Demonstrate the non-inferiority of tenotomy of biceps' long head by mini-optics in consultation (hyperambulatory) compared to upon arthroscopy under normal operating condition on scare quality, in particular on time to onset | Time to onset will be evaluated by investigator, in number of days. | 6 months (V6) after surgery | |
Secondary | Demonstrate the non-inferiority of tenotomy of biceps' long head by mini-optics in consultation (hyperambulatory) compared to upon arthroscopy under normal operating condition on scare quality, in particular on time to onset | Time to onset will be evaluated by investigator, in number of days. | 12 months (V7) after surgery | |
Secondary | Demonstrate the non-inferiority of tenotomy of biceps' long head by mini-optics in consultation (hyperambulatory) compared to upon arthroscopy under normal operating condition on scare quality,in particular on possible desunion | Desunion will be evaluated by investigator, with 2 possible values : yes or no. | 2 weeks (V3) after surgery | |
Secondary | Demonstrate the non-inferiority of tenotomy of biceps' long head by mini-optics in consultation (hyperambulatory) compared to upon arthroscopy under normal operating condition on scare quality,in particular on possible desunion | Desunion will be evaluated by investigator, with 2 possible values : yes or no. | 6 weeks (V4) after surgery | |
Secondary | Demonstrate the non-inferiority of tenotomy of biceps' long head by mini-optics in consultation (hyperambulatory) compared to upon arthroscopy under normal operating condition on scare quality,in particular on possible desunion | Desunion will be evaluated by investigator, with 2 possible values : yes or no. | 3 months (V5) after surgery | |
Secondary | Demonstrate the non-inferiority of tenotomy of biceps' long head by mini-optics in consultation (hyperambulatory) compared to upon arthroscopy under normal operating condition on scare quality,in particular on possible desunion | Desunion will be evaluated by investigator, with 2 possible values : yes or no. | 6 months (V6) after surgery | |
Secondary | Demonstrate the non-inferiority of tenotomy of biceps' long head by mini-optics in consultation (hyperambulatory) compared to upon arthroscopy under normal operating condition on scare quality,in particular on possible desunion | Desunion will be evaluated by investigator, with 2 possible values : yes or no. | 12 months (V7) after surgery | |
Secondary | Demonstrate the non-inferiority of tenotomy of biceps' long head by mini-optics in consultation (hyperambulatory) compared to upon arthroscopy under normal operating condition on shoulder function, in particular on active and passive mobility | Active and passive mobility of both shoulders will be assessed by investigator on following parameters: abduction, adduction, flexion extension, internal and external rotation. All theses paramèters will be assessed with a goniometer, in degree. | At inclusion (V0) | |
Secondary | Demonstrate the non-inferiority of tenotomy of biceps' long head by mini-optics in consultation (hyperambulatory) compared to upon arthroscopy under normal operating condition on shoulder function, in particular on active and passive mobility | Active and passive mobility of both shoulders will be assessed by investigator on following parameters: abduction, adduction, flexion extension, internal and external rotation. All theses paramèters will be assessed with a goniometer, in degree. | 2 weeks (V3) after surgery | |
Secondary | Demonstrate the non-inferiority of tenotomy of biceps' long head by mini-optics in consultation (hyperambulatory) compared to upon arthroscopy under normal operating condition on shoulder function, in particular on active and passive mobility | Active and passive mobility of both shoulders will be assessed by investigator on following parameters: abduction, adduction, flexion extension, internal and external rotation. All theses paramèters will be assessed with a goniometer, in degree. | 6 weeks (V4) after surgery | |
Secondary | Demonstrate the non-inferiority of tenotomy of biceps' long head by mini-optics in consultation (hyperambulatory) compared to upon arthroscopy under normal operating condition on shoulder function, in particular on active and passive mobility | Active and passive mobility of both shoulders will be assessed by investigator on following parameters: abduction, adduction, flexion extension, internal and external rotation. All theses paramèters will be assessed with a goniometer, in degree. | 3 months (V5) after surgery | |
Secondary | Demonstrate the non-inferiority of tenotomy of biceps' long head by mini-optics in consultation (hyperambulatory) compared to upon arthroscopy under normal operating condition on shoulder function, in particular on active and passive mobility | Active and passive mobility of both shoulders will be assessed by investigator on following parameters: abduction, adduction, flexion extension, internal and external rotation. All theses paramèters will be assessed with a goniometer, in degree. | 6 months (V6) after surgery | |
Secondary | Demonstrate the non-inferiority of tenotomy of biceps' long head by mini-optics in consultation (hyperambulatory) compared to upon arthroscopy under normal operating condition on shoulder function, in particular on active and passive mobility | Active and passive mobility of both shoulders will be assessed by investigator on following parameters: abduction, adduction, flexion extension, internal and external rotation. All theses paramèters will be assessed with a goniometer, in degree. | 12 months (V7) after surgery | |
Secondary | Demonstrate the non-inferiority of tenotomy of biceps' long head by mini-optics in consultation (hyperambulatory) compared to upon arthroscopy under normal operating condition on shoulder function, in particular on Subjective Shoulder Value | The Subjective Shoulder Value will be evalued by patient himself, by answering the following question: What value do you give to your shoulder, out of 100, compared to a normal shoulder rated at 100% ? this scale ranges from 0 (non-functional shoulder) to 100 (normal shoulder) | At inclusion (V0) | |
Secondary | Demonstrate the non-inferiority of tenotomy of biceps' long head by mini-optics in consultation (hyperambulatory) compared to upon arthroscopy under normal operating condition on shoulder function, in particular on Subjective Shoulder Value | The Subjective Shoulder Value will be evalued by patient himself, by answering the following question: What value do you give to your shoulder, out of 100, compared to a normal shoulder rated at 100% ? this scale ranges from 0 (non-functional shoulder) to 100 (normal shoulder) | 2 weeks (V3) after surgery | |
Secondary | Demonstrate the non-inferiority of tenotomy of biceps' long head by mini-optics in consultation (hyperambulatory) compared to upon arthroscopy under normal operating condition on shoulder function, in particular on Subjective Shoulder Value | The Subjective Shoulder Value will be evalued by patient himself, by answering the following question: What value do you give to your shoulder, out of 100, compared to a normal shoulder rated at 100% ? this scale ranges from 0 (non-functional shoulder) to 100 (normal shoulder) | 6 weeks (V4) after surgery | |
Secondary | Demonstrate the non-inferiority of tenotomy of biceps' long head by mini-optics in consultation (hyperambulatory) compared to upon arthroscopy under normal operating condition on shoulder function, in particular on Subjective Shoulder Value | The Subjective Shoulder Value will be evalued by patient himself, by answering the following question: What value do you give to your shoulder, out of 100, compared to a normal shoulder rated at 100% ? this scale ranges from 0 (non-functional shoulder) to 100 (normal shoulder) | 3 months (V5) after surgery | |
Secondary | Demonstrate the non-inferiority of tenotomy of biceps' long head by mini-optics in consultation (hyperambulatory) compared to upon arthroscopy under normal operating condition on shoulder function, in particular on Subjective Shoulder Value | The Subjective Shoulder Value will be evalued by patient himself, by answering the following question: What value do you give to your shoulder, out of 100, compared to a normal shoulder rated at 100% ? this scale ranges from 0 (non-functional shoulder) to 100 (normal shoulder) | 6 months (V6) after surgery | |
Secondary | Demonstrate the non-inferiority of tenotomy of biceps' long head by mini-optics in consultation (hyperambulatory) compared to upon arthroscopy under normal operating condition on shoulder function, in particular on Subjective Shoulder Value | The Subjective Shoulder Value will be evalued by patient himself, by answering the following question: What value do you give to your shoulder, out of 100, compared to a normal shoulder rated at 100% ? this scale ranges from 0 (non-functional shoulder) to 100 (normal shoulder) | 12 months (V7) after surgery | |
Secondary | Demonstrate the non-inferiority of tenotomy of biceps' long head by mini-optics in consultation (hyperambulatory) compared to upon arthroscopy under normal operating condition on patient satisfaction, with Constant's score | Patient satisfaction will be evaluated using Constant's score, a quantitative value from 0 to 100. | At inclusion (V0) | |
Secondary | Demonstrate the non-inferiority of tenotomy of biceps' long head by mini-optics in consultation (hyperambulatory) compared to upon arthroscopy under normal operating condition on patient satisfaction, with Constant's score | Patient satisfaction will be evaluated using Constant's score, a quantitative value from 0 to 100. | 2 weeks (V3) after surgery | |
Secondary | Demonstrate the non-inferiority of tenotomy of biceps' long head by mini-optics in consultation (hyperambulatory) compared to upon arthroscopy under normal operating condition on patient satisfaction, with Constant's score | Patient satisfaction will be evaluated using Constant's score, a quantitative value from 0 to 100. | 6 weeks (V4) after surgery | |
Secondary | Demonstrate the non-inferiority of tenotomy of biceps' long head by mini-optics in consultation (hyperambulatory) compared to upon arthroscopy under normal operating condition on patient satisfaction, with Constant's score | Patient satisfaction will be evaluated using Constant's score, a quantitative value from 0 to 100. | 3 months (V5) after surgery | |
Secondary | Demonstrate the non-inferiority of tenotomy of biceps' long head by mini-optics in consultation (hyperambulatory) compared to upon arthroscopy under normal operating condition on patient satisfaction, with Constant's score | Patient satisfaction will be evaluated using Constant's score, a quantitative value from 0 to 100. | 6 months (V6) after surgery | |
Secondary | Demonstrate the non-inferiority of tenotomy of biceps' long head by mini-optics in consultation (hyperambulatory) compared to upon arthroscopy under normal operating condition on patient satisfaction, with Constant's score | Patient satisfaction will be evaluated using Constant's score, a quantitative value from 0 to 100. | 12 months (V7) after surgery |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT04930393 -
Evaluating the Efficacy of PECS II Block Versus Axillary Ring Block in Rotator Cuff Repair Patients
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03717753 -
Rotator Cuff Pathway
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04454671 -
Ultrasound-guided Percutaneous Neuromodulation Versus Dry Needling in Shoulder Pain Treatment
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT06274827 -
Electromyographic Analysis of Scapular Muscles During Closed Kinetic Chain Exercises
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05413213 -
Ambulatory Rehabilitation Program in Patients With Degenerative Rupture of the Rotator Cuff Tendons of the Shoulder
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05043844 -
Comparison of the Incidence of Shoulder Pain According to Postoperative Use of Abdominal Binder
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT02903719 -
The Effect of Phrenic Nerve Block on Postoperative Shoulder Pain in Patients for Liver Resection.
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT02777281 -
Safe and Effective Shoulder Exercise Training in Manual Wheelchair Users With SCI
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02554968 -
Reliability and Validity of Patient Reported Outcome Measures in Head and Neck Cancer
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT02242630 -
Relationship to Dose of Triamcinolone Acetonide and Methylyprednisolone to Improvement in Subacromial Bursitis
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT02843269 -
Multiple-component Workplace FRamed Intervention to Decrease Occupational Muscle Pain - FRIDOM
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02631395 -
The Effect of a Shoulder Training Program to Prevent Shoulder Pain Among Girls in Junior Team Handball
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01733914 -
Contralateral Acupuncture in the Treatment of Chronic Shoulder Pain
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT01885377 -
SWESS: The SWedish Exercise Shoulder Study in Primary Care for Patients With Subacromial Pain
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01205542 -
Work Place Adjusted Intelligent Physical Exercise Reducing Musculoskeletal Pain in Shoulder and Neck (VIMS) - Shoulder Function
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01843660 -
An Efficacy and Safety Study of Tramadol Hydrochloride-Paracetamol in Treatment of Moderate to Severe Acute Neck-Shoulder Pain and Low Back Pain
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT00743600 -
Ultrasound Evaluation of the Rotator Cable and Associated Structures.
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00679887 -
Chronic Shoulder Pain Treated by Pressures With the Thumbs on the Trigger Points
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT04058522 -
Treatment of Subacromial Shoulder Pain by Individual or Group Physiotherapy Following Corticosteroid Injection
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03353272 -
The Influence of a Cognitive Behavioral Approach on Changing Patient Expectations in Shoulder Pain
|
N/A |