Open Latarjet Techniques Versus Arthroscopic Latarjet Techniques on Anterior Shoulder Instability: The Comparison of Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes

Shoulder Instability Clinical Trial

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT01912027
• Other study ID #: JST1307A2
• Secondary ID: JST130701
• Status: Recruiting
• Phase: N/A
• First received: July 18, 2013
• Last updated: October 9, 2013
• Start date: January 2013
• Est. completion date: May 2014

Study information

• Verified date: October 2013
• Source: Beijing Jishuitan Hospital
• Contact: F Li, MD
• Phone: 0086-010-58516202
• Email: long_bmu[@]163.com
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Health authority: China: Ministry of Health
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The open Latarjet techniques has benn considered as an effective treatment on anterior shoulder instability.Over the past decade there has been a shift from open to all-arthroscopic technique in many surgeries. The arthroscopic technique may result in less postoperative stiffness and faster rehabilitation. So we hypothesized that the arthroscopic Latarjet techniques would have better clinical and radiographic outcomes than the open Latarjet Techniques on anterior shoulder instability.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Recruiting
• Enrollment: 30
• Est. completion date: May 2014
• Est. primary completion date: March 2014
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: Both
• Age group: 18 Years to 80 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• age older than 15 years

• Traumatic anterior shoulder instability

• Recurrent instability

• Glenoid defects larger than 25%

• Clinical and radiographic data at pre-operation and follow-up

Exclusion Criteria:

• Younger than 18 years

• Non-traumatic shoulder instability

• Primary episode of instability

• Glenoid defects less than 25%

• Previous surgical procedure Incomplete clinical or radiographic data Combination with rotator cuff tear

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Investigator), Primary Purpose: Treatment

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Shoulder Instability

Intervention

Procedure:
• Open Latarjet technique

• Arthroscopic Latarjet techniques

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
China	Beijing Jishuitan Hospital	Beijing	Beijing
China	Beijing Jishuitan Hospital	Beijng	Beijing

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Fenglong Li, MD

Country where clinical trial is conducted

China, 

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	The functional and clinical outcomes are evaluated with the range of motion(ROM),VAS scores, UCLA scores, Constant scores, ASES scores and SST scores. The radiographic outcome is also assessed with X-ray plain film .		up to 3 years	Yes