Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT05084573
Other study ID # UW 20-247
Secondary ID
Status Recruiting
Phase Phase 3
First received
Last updated
Start date August 1, 2020
Est. completion date March 31, 2023

Study information

Verified date October 2021
Source The University of Hong Kong
Contact Chi Wing Chan
Phone 22551740
Email timmychancw@gmail.com
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of continuous interscalene block (CISB) using standard bupivacaine versus a single interscalene injection of liposomal bupivacaine (LB) on pain control following surgical fixation of proximal humerus fractures.


Description:

Restricted range of motion following open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of proximal humerus fractures is a potential complication that severely limits functional outcomes . It must therefore be avoided by adequate pain control in order to allow for early mobilisation in addition to physiotherapy. Interscalene block (ISB) is one of the most effective and widely used regional analgesic options shoulder surgeries. ISB can be delivered as a single injection or by continuous infusion via an indwelling catheter. While continuous interscalene block (CISB) offers a longer duration of analgesia as compared to a single injection of the same anaesthetic, it carries an inherent risk of catheter malposition, dislodgement, and infection. As compared to standard bupivacaine (SB), liposomal bupivacaine (LB) is a formulation designed to prolong the duration of analgesia up to 72 hours via a single injection. While this could avoid the need for an indwelling catheter, results of studies comparing LB to CISB have been inconsistent. The purpose of this is non-inferiority trial is to compare the effectiveness of a single injection of LB versus CISB with SB on pain control following ORIF of proximal humerus fractures. The study hypothesis is that LB is not unacceptably worse than CISB with regard to pain control in the first two postoperative days. Patients providing informed consent will be screened for eligibility. All eligible patients will be randomly assigned in a double-blind manner (participant and investigator) and a 1:1 ratio to receive either LB or CISB.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Recruiting
Enrollment 92
Est. completion date March 31, 2023
Est. primary completion date July 31, 2022
Accepts healthy volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Gender All
Age group 18 Years to 80 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - ASA I-III - Age between 18 and 80 - Isolated Proximal humeral fracture (AO Types 31.A1-3 and B1-3 or Neer 2/3 part or greater tuberosity fracture equivalent) - Locking Plate fixation - Split deltoid minimal invasive approach Exclusion Criteria: - Revision surgery - Impaired cognitive function (Abbreviated Mental Test Score (AMT score) < 8) - 4 part fractures - Poor surgical reduction quality - Unable to attend rehabilitation - Preexisting shoulder problems - Fracture fixation stability unable to tolerate early passive motion exercise - Use of implants other than a locking plate for fracture fixation - Activity of daily living is dependent on others - Polytrauma - Use of deltopectoral approach - Patient unable to follow post-operative rehabilitation protocol with early mobilization - Allergy to amide local anaesthetics, paracetamol, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS), opioids - Respiratory Disease with limited respiratory reserve - Cardiac Disease: Any degree of Heart Block, Heart Failure - Neurological: Any Seizure Disorder - Psychiatric illnesses affecting pain perception e.g. severe depression and anxiety disorder - Alcohol or substance abuse - Chronic Pain, other than chronic knee pain - Daily use of strong opioids (morphine, fentanyl, hydromorphone, ketobemidone, methadone, nicomorphine, oxycodone, or meperidine) - Impaired Renal Function (defined as preoperative eGFR < 30ml /min /1.73 m2) - Impaired Hepatic Function - Pregnancy - Inability to use PCA - Patient refusal to ISB - Patient refusal to study - Patients do not understand Cantonese

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Drug:
Liposomal bupivacaine
Single bolus injection 10mL 1.33% LB
Standard bupivacaine
Single bolus 10mL 0.25% SB + continuous 300mL 0.2% SB @5mL/hr

Locations

Country Name City State
Hong Kong Queen Mary Hospital Hong Kong

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
The University of Hong Kong

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Hong Kong, 

References & Publications (7)

Budge M, Orvets N, Shields E. Single-shot liposomal bupivacaine interscalene nerve block provides equivalent pain relief compared to continuous catheter interscalene nerve block in total shoulder arthroplasty. Seminars in Arthroplasty: JSES. 2020;30(4):285-90.

Hodgson SA, Mawson SJ, Stanley D. Rehabilitation after two-part fractures of the neck of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003 Apr;85(3):419-22. — View Citation

Malik O, Kaye AD, Kaye A, Belani K, Urman RD. Emerging roles of liposomal bupivacaine in anesthesia practice. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2017 Apr-Jun;33(2):151-156. doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_375_15. Review. — View Citation

Marino J, Scuderi G, Dowling O, Farquhar R, Freycinet B, Overdyk F. Periarticular Knee Injection With Liposomal Bupivacaine and Continuous Femoral Nerve Block for Postoperative Pain Management After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Arthroplasty. 2019 Mar;34(3):495-500. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.11.025. Epub 2018 Nov 23. — View Citation

Sabesan VJ, Shahriar R, Petersen-Fitts GR, Whaley JD, Bou-Akl T, Sweet M, Milia M. A prospective randomized controlled trial to identify the optimal postoperative pain management in shoulder arthroplasty: liposomal bupivacaine versus continuous interscalene catheter. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017 Oct;26(10):1810-1817. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2017.06.044. Epub 2017 Aug 24. — View Citation

Vorobeichik L, Brull R, Bowry R, Laffey JG, Abdallah FW. Should continuous rather than single-injection interscalene block be routinely offered for major shoulder surgery? A meta-analysis of the analgesic and side-effects profiles. Br J Anaesth. 2018 Apr;120(4):679-692. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2017.11.104. Epub 2018 Feb 13. — View Citation

Weller WJ, Azzam MG, Smith RA, Azar FM, Throckmorton TW. Liposomal Bupivacaine Mixture Has Similar Pain Relief and Significantly Fewer Complications at Less Cost Compared to Indwelling Interscalene Catheter in Total Shoulder Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2017 Nov;32(11):3557-3562. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.03.017. Epub 2017 Mar 16. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Pain on movement as measured by Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Numerical rating scale (NRS) during attempted passive forward shoulder flexion to 90 degrees; 0 points (no pain) to 11 points (worst pain imaginable). At each post-op day 1-7
Primary Pain at rest as measured by Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Numerical rating scale (NRS) at rest; 0 points (no pain) to 11 points (worst pain imaginable). At each post-op day 1-7
Secondary Intraoperative opioid consumption Intraoperative IV remifentanil consumption (mcg/kg/min) Intraoperative
Secondary Incidence of ISB related complications Complications related to interscalene block Intraoperative to post-op day 3
Secondary PCA morphine consumption Amount of patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) morphine consumed (mg) From immediately post-operation to post-op day 2
Secondary Number of patients with side effects effects of PCA using morphine Side effects related to opioid use (Nausea/Vomiting, Dizziness, Constipation) From immediately post-operation to post-op day 2
Secondary Rescue morphine consumption Additional opioid used in addition to PCA morphine From immediately post-operation to post-op day 2
Secondary Total length of stay Duration of hospital stay (days) Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Secondary Analgesic consumption after discharge Total analgesic consumption (dihydrocodeine) after hospital discharge (pill count) From post-op day 3 to day 7
Secondary Overall Benefit of Analgesia Score (OBAS) Patient-reported measure of pain, side effects, and satisfaction of post-operative analgesia; 7 questions rated from 0 (worst outcome) to 4 (best outcome) Immediate post-operation to post-op day 3
Secondary Presence of chronic pain at follow-up Presence of chronic pain by self-report At 2 weeks, 6 weeks and 3 months post-op
Secondary Presence of neuropathic pain at follow-up Presence of neuropathic pain by physical examination and neuropathic pain questionnaire, a 10-item mixed self-report/observer rated physical exam measure ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10, with a score of 4 or greater diagnostic of neuropathic pain At post-op 2 weeks, 6 weeks and 3 months
Secondary Region-specific physical functioning and symptoms Physical function and symptoms measured by Shortened Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire (QuickDASH), an 11-item patient-reported measure with a total score ranging from 0 (no disability) to 100 (most severe disability). At post-op 2 weeks, 6 weeks and 3 months
Secondary Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) 12-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12), a patient-reported outcome measure of HRQOL comprised of a mental component (MCS) and physical component (PCS), each with a final score ranging from 0 (worst outcome) to 100 (best outcome). At post-op 2 weeks, 6 weeks and 3 months
Secondary Patient satisfaction as measured by the Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire General Satisfaction Subscale Patient satisfaction with healthcare provision as measured by the Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire General Satisfaction subscale (PSQ18-GS), a two-item subscale with a final score ranging from 0 (lowest satisfaction) to 10 (highest satisfaction) At post-op 2 weeks, 6 weeks and 3 months
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Enrolling by invitation NCT04003272 - MDR - Comprehensive Reverse/Versa Dial Ti Glenosphere
Active, not recruiting NCT02944058 - Plate Fixation Versus Intramedullary Nailing of 3 and 4 Part Proximal Humerus Fractures N/A
Withdrawn NCT00741182 - Effect of PTH(1-34) Treatment on Fracture Healing in Vivo Phase 2
Completed NCT03217344 - Conservative Treatment of Proximal Humeral Fractures N/A
Recruiting NCT02609906 - Operative Treatment of 2-fragment-fractures (AO 11-A3) of the Proximal Humerus in the Elderly: Cement Augmented Locking Plate Philos vs. Proximal Humerus Nail MultiLoc N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT05302089 - Rehabilitation Following Displaced Proximal Humerus Fractures N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT06416618 - Surgical Versus Non-surgical Treatment of Displaced Proximal Humerus Fracture in Adults Aged 50 to 65 Years N/A
Completed NCT02836366 - Targon PH+ Follow-Up
Recruiting NCT01687374 - Parathyroid Hormone for the Treatment of Humerus Fractures Phase 4
Recruiting NCT04928664 - Continuous vs Liposomal Bupivacaine Interscalene Block for Proximal Humeral Fracture (CLIP) Phase 4
Completed NCT02539173 - Diagnosis of Diaphragmatic Paralysis After Interscalene Block: Feasibility and Impact Observed N/A
Recruiting NCT04984291 - Zimmer Biomet Shoulder Arthroplasty PMCF N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT06357143 - Efficacy of Early Multimodal Physiotherapy in Patients With Reverse Shoulder Prosthesis N/A
Recruiting NCT02913378 - Conservative vs Surgical Treatment for Proximal Humerus Fractures in the Elderly N/A
Enrolling by invitation NCT04003311 - MDR - Comprehensive Primary/Micro Stem & Versa-Dial Ti Humeral Head
Recruiting NCT04651543 - X-Ray Follow-up in Proximal Humeral Fractures Conservatively Treated
Not yet recruiting NCT04507880 - A 2-Year Prospective Follow-up Study of the Global Unite Reverse Fracture Shoulder System for Proximal Humerus Fractures N/A
Terminated NCT03599336 - RSA vs. Nonop for 3 & 4-Part Proximal Humerus Fractures N/A
Recruiting NCT05284357 - Post Market Clinical Follow-up Study for Arthroplasty Shoulder System of FX Solutions at the Long Term
Not yet recruiting NCT06360887 - Management of Proximal Humerus Fractures in Adults: a Clinical Trial