Shoulder Dislocation Clinical Trial
— OASISOfficial title:
Open Versus Arthroscopic Stabilization of Shoulder Instability With Subcritical Bone Loss: The OASIS Trial
This clinical trial will investigate the effects of three surgical procedures and the associated post-operative rehabilitation to optimize time to return to military duty, work and sports, and patient-reported physical function for military personnel and civilians with traumatic anterior shoulder instability and 10-20% glenoid bone loss.
Status | Recruiting |
Enrollment | 400 |
Est. completion date | September 2024 |
Est. primary completion date | September 2024 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 17 Years to 50 Years |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Civilians and military personnel ages 17 to 50 - Traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation - Associated subcritical bone loss between 10-20% less the glenoid width quantified by standard of care CT scan Exclusion Criteria: - Chronic, non-traumatic multi-directional instability based on clinical exam. - Concurrent shoulder injury (e.g. rotator cuff tears, motor nerve pathologies, osteoarthritis of a Samilson-Prieto grade >2). - Prior instability or rotator cuff procedure on involved shoulder (including intra-articular soft tissue surgery). - Humeral sided bone lesion (Hill-Sachs lesion) that is sufficiently large enough to render the lesion "off-track" even after a bony augmentation procedure would be performed. - Neuromuscular and other movement control pathologies including seizures. - Vascular injury associated with the shoulder trauma. - Traumatic brain injury or any condition that would preclude the ability to comply with post-operative guidelines. - Does not plan to return to pre-injury levels of work, sports or military duty. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United States | US Naval Health Clinic (Academy) | Annapolis | Maryland |
United States | Walter Reed National Military Medical Center | Bethesda | Maryland |
United States | Naval Medical Center Camp Lejeune | Camp Lejeune | North Carolina |
United States | University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill | Chapel Hill | North Carolina |
United States | University of Virginia | Charlottesville | Virginia |
United States | Duke University | Durham | North Carolina |
United States | University of Connecticut Health Center | Farmington | Connecticut |
United States | Evans Army Community Hospital | Fort Carson | Colorado |
United States | San Antonio Military Medical Center | Fort Sam Houston | Texas |
United States | University of Pittsburgh | Pittsburgh | Pennsylvania |
United States | Rhode Island Hospital- University Orthopedics | Providence | Rhode Island |
United States | Naval Medical Center | San Diego | California |
United States | Steadman Clinic | Vail | Colorado |
United States | Wake Forest University | Winston-Salem | North Carolina |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
University of Pittsburgh | Walter Reed National Military Medical Center |
United States,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI) | The Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI) is a 21-item instability-specific patient-reported outcome measure of physical symptoms, sports, recreation, work, lifestyle and emotions. The best possible score is 0 and a worst possible score is 2100. The WOSI was found to be responsive and sensitive to detecting change over time, demonstrating its utility as a primary outcome to evaluate treatments and to monitor participants' progress over time. | 3 months after randomization | |
Primary | Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI) | The Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI) is a 21-item instability-specific patient-reported outcome measure of physical symptoms, sports, recreation, work, lifestyle and emotions. The best possible score is 0 and a worst possible score is 2100. The WOSI was found to be responsive and sensitive to detecting change over time, demonstrating its utility as a primary outcome to evaluate treatments and to monitor participants' progress over time. | 6 months after randomization | |
Primary | Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI) | The Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI) is a 21-item instability-specific patient-reported outcome measure of physical symptoms, sports, recreation, work, lifestyle and emotions. The best possible score is 0 and a worst possible score is 2100. The WOSI was found to be responsive and sensitive to detecting change over time, demonstrating its utility as a primary outcome to evaluate treatments and to monitor participants' progress over time. | 12 months after randomization | |
Primary | Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI) | The Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI) is a 21-item instability-specific patient-reported outcome measure of physical symptoms, sports, recreation, work, lifestyle and emotions. The best possible score is 0 and a worst possible score is 2100. The WOSI was found to be responsive and sensitive to detecting change over time, demonstrating its utility as a primary outcome to evaluate treatments and to monitor participants' progress over time. | 24 months after randomization | |
Primary | Time to Return to Pre-Injury Level of Activity | Time to return to pre-injury level military duty, work and sports. | Monthly starting at 3 months after randomization and continuing to 24 months | |
Primary | Recurrent Instability / Re-injury | Recurrent instability will consist of any of the following events: dislocation, subluxation, revision stabilization procedure. | 3 months after randomization | |
Primary | Recurrent Instability / Re-injury | Recurrent instability will consist of any of the following events: dislocation, subluxation, revision stabilization procedure. | 6 months after randomization | |
Primary | Recurrent Instability / Re-injury | Recurrent instability will consist of any of the following events: dislocation, subluxation, revision stabilization procedure. | 12 months after randomization | |
Primary | Recurrent Instability / Re-injury | Recurrent instability will consist of any of the following events: dislocation, subluxation, revision stabilization procedure. | 24 months after randomization | |
Secondary | Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation (SANE) | The SANE is a single-item, global, patient-reported outcome measure, where the participant provides a whole number response to the question "On a scale from 0 to 100, how would you rate your injured shoulder today, with 100 being normal?" SANE scale reliability is excellent (ICC greater or equal to 0.80) and Standard Error of Measurement ranges from 4.23 to 7.82 points. Validity of the SANE displays correlations of 0.50 - 0.88 (moderate to very strong correlations) between the SANE scale and other partient-reported outcome measures. | 3 months after surgery | |
Secondary | Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation (SANE) | The SANE is a single-item, global, patient-reported outcome measure, where the participant provides a whole number response to the question "On a scale from 0 to 100, how would you rate your injured shoulder today, with 100 being normal?" SANE scale reliability is excellent (ICC greater or equal to 0.80) and Standard Error of Measurement ranges from 4.23 to 7.82 points. Validity of the SANE displays correlations of 0.50 - 0.88 (moderate to very strong correlations) between the SANE scale and other partient-reported outcome measures. | 6 months after surgery | |
Secondary | Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation (SANE) | The SANE is a single-item, global, patient-reported outcome measure, where the participant provides a whole number response to the question "On a scale from 0 to 100, how would you rate your injured shoulder today, with 100 being normal?" SANE scale reliability is excellent (ICC greater or equal to 0.80) and Standard Error of Measurement ranges from 4.23 to 7.82 points. Validity of the SANE displays correlations of 0.50 - 0.88 (moderate to very strong correlations) between the SANE scale and other partient-reported outcome measures. | 12 months after surgery | |
Secondary | Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation (SANE) | The SANE is a single-item, global, patient-reported outcome measure, where the participant provides a whole number response to the question "On a scale from 0 to 100, how would you rate your injured shoulder today, with 100 being normal?" SANE scale reliability is excellent (ICC greater or equal to 0.80) and Standard Error of Measurement ranges from 4.23 to 7.82 points. Validity of the SANE displays correlations of 0.50 - 0.88 (moderate to very strong correlations) between the SANE scale and other partient-reported outcome measures. | 24 months after surgery | |
Secondary | Brophy Shoulder Activity Level | The Brophy Shoulder Activity Level is a patient-reported measure of participant's level of sports activity. It consists of 5 items that are rated in a 5-point scale (0-4), where higher scores indicate greater activity engagement. Possible scores on the scale range from 0 - 20. | 3 months after randomization | |
Secondary | Brophy Shoulder Activity Level | The Brophy Shoulder Activity Level is a patient-reported measure of participant's level of sports activity. It consists of 5 items that are rated in a 5-point scale (0-4), where higher scores indicate greater activity engagement. Possible scores on the scale range from 0 - 20. | 6 months after randomization | |
Secondary | Brophy Shoulder Activity Level | The Brophy Shoulder Activity Level is a patient-reported measure of participant's level of sports activity. It consists of 5 items that are rated in a 5-point scale (0-4), where higher scores indicate greater activity engagement. Possible scores on the scale range from 0 - 20. | 12 months after randomization | |
Secondary | Brophy Shoulder Activity Level | The Brophy Shoulder Activity Level is a patient-reported measure of participant's level of sports activity. It consists of 5 items that are rated in a 5-point scale (0-4), where higher scores indicate greater activity engagement. Possible scores on the scale range from 0 - 20. | 24 months after randomization | |
Secondary | Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function (PF) - Upper Extremity (UE) | The Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function Scale - Upper Extremity (UE) consists of an item bank of 121 items that assesses physical function regardless of the health condition present that can be administered as a computer adaptive test (CAT) or through the use of short forms. The Physical Function scale scores transformed to a T-score in which a score of 50 represents the US population average with a standard deviation of 10 indicating the population standard deviation. | 3 months after randomization | |
Secondary | Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function (PF) - Upper Extremity (UE) | The Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function Scale - Upper Extremity (UE) consists of an item bank of 121 items that assesses physical function regardless of the health condition present that can be administered as a computer adaptive test (CAT) or through the use of short forms. The Physical Function scale scores transformed to a T-score in which a score of 50 represents the US population average with a standard deviation of 10 indicating the population standard deviation. | 6 months after randomization | |
Secondary | Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function (PF) - Upper Extremity (UE) | The Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function Scale - Upper Extremity (UE) consists of an item bank of 121 items that assesses physical function regardless of the health condition present that can be administered as a computer adaptive test (CAT) or through the use of short forms. The Physical Function scale scores transformed to a T-score in which a score of 50 represents the US population average with a standard deviation of 10 indicating the population standard deviation. | 12 months after randomization | |
Secondary | Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function (PF) - Upper Extremity (UE) | The Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function Scale - Upper Extremity (UE) consists of an item bank of 121 items that assesses physical function regardless of the health condition present that can be administered as a computer adaptive test (CAT) or through the use of short forms. The Physical Function scale scores transformed to a T-score in which a score of 50 represents the US population average with a standard deviation of 10 indicating the population standard deviation. | 24 months after randomization | |
Secondary | Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Global-10 | The PROMIS-10 Global Health also measures five domains: physical function, fatigue, pain, emotional distress, and social health. Items are rated on a five-point scale. It includes physical and mental health component scores that can be transformed to t score distributions with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10. A higher score indicates better health. | 3 months after surgery | |
Secondary | Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Global-10 | The PROMIS-10 Global Health also measures five domains: physical function, fatigue, pain, emotional distress, and social health. Items are rated on a five-point scale. It includes physical and mental health component scores that can be transformed to t score distributions with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10. A higher score indicates better health. | 6 months after surgery | |
Secondary | Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Global-10 | The PROMIS Global-10 is a 10-item patient reported global measure of physical and emotional health. The PROMIS-10 Global Health also measures five domains: physical function, fatigue, pain, emotional distress, and social health. Items are rated on a five-point scale. It includes physical and mental health component scores that can be transformed to t score distributions with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10. A higher score indicates better health. | 12 months after surgery | |
Secondary | Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Global-10 | The PROMIS Global-10 is a 10-item patient reported global measure of physical and emotional health. The PROMIS-10 Global Health also measures five domains: physical function, fatigue, pain, emotional distress, and social health. Items are rated on a five-point scale. It includes physical and mental health component scores that can be transformed to t score distributions with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10. A higher score indicates better health. | 24 months after surgery | |
Secondary | Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia-11 (TSK-11) | The Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia-11 quantifies fear of re-injury due to movement and physical activity. Items are scored from 1 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree). Total TSK-11 scores range from 11 - 44, with higher scores indicating greater fear of pain, movement, and injury. | 3 months after surgery | |
Secondary | Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia-11 (TSK-11) | The Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia-11 quantifies fear of re-injury due to movement and physical activity. Items are scored from 1 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree). Total TSK-11 scores range from 11 - 44, with higher scores indicating greater fear of pain, movement, and injury. | 6 months after surgery | |
Secondary | Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia-11 (TSK-11) | The Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia-11 quantifies fear of re-injury due to movement and physical activity. Items are scored from 1 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree). Total TSK-11 scores range from 11 - 44, with higher scores indicating greater fear of pain, movement, and injury. | 12 months after surgery | |
Secondary | Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia-11 (TSK-11) | The Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia-11 quantifies fear of re-injury due to movement and physical activity. Items are scored from 1 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree). Total TSK-11 scores range from 11 - 44, with higher scores indicating greater fear of pain, movement, and injury. | 24 months after surgery | |
Secondary | Brief Resilience Scale | The Brief Resilience Scale is a 6-item questionnaire that measures an individual's ability to recover from an ongoing health related stress. It uses a 5-point Likert scale that ranges from "strongly disagree" to "strongly agree." Totally, the individual responses creates a range of possible scores from 6 - 30. The total score is then divided by the total number of questions answered for the final score. The scores range from 1 to 5, where higher scores indicate positive resilience capabilities. | 3 months after randomization | |
Secondary | Brief Resilience Scale | The Brief Resilience Scale is a 6-item questionnaire that measures an individual's ability to recover from an ongoing health related stress. It uses a 5-point Likert scale that ranges from "strongly disagree" to "strongly agree." Totally, the individual responses creates a range of possible scores from 6 - 30. The total score is then divided by the total number of questions answered for the final score. The scores range from 1 to 5, where higher scores indicate positive resilience capabilities. | 6 months after randomization | |
Secondary | Brief Resilience Scale | The Brief Resilience Scale is a 6-item questionnaire that measures an individual's ability to recover from an ongoing health related stress. It uses a 5-point Likert scale that ranges from "strongly disagree" to "strongly agree." Totally, the individual responses creates a range of possible scores from 6 - 30. The total score is then divided by the total number of questions answered for the final score. The scores range from 1 to 5, where higher scores indicate positive resilience capabilities. | 12 months after randomization | |
Secondary | Brief Resilience Scale | The Brief Resilience Scale is a 6-item questionnaire that measures an individual's ability to recover from an ongoing health related stress. It uses a 5-point Likert scale that ranges from "strongly disagree" to "strongly agree." Totally, the individual responses creates a range of possible scores from 6 - 30. The total score is then divided by the total number of questions answered for the final score. The scores range from 1 to 5, where higher scores indicate positive resilience capabilities. | 24 months after randomization | |
Secondary | Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) | The Patient Acceptable Symptom State is assessed by asking the participant the question: Taking into account all the activity you have during your daily life, your level of pain and also activity limitations and participation restrictions, do you consider the current state of your shoulder satisfactory?" The PSS question is answered "Yes" or "No". A response of "Yes" indicates that the individual is satisfied with his/her current symptom state. The PASS question has show to have sufficient rest re-test reliability in patients after orthopaedic surgery, with a reported kappa coefficient of 0.78. | 3 months after randomization | |
Secondary | Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) | The Patient Acceptable Symptom State is assessed by asking the participant the question: Taking into account all the activity you have during your daily life, your level of pain and also activity limitations and participation restrictions, do you consider the current state of your shoulder satisfactory?" The PSS question is answered "Yes" or "No". A response of "Yes" indicates that the individual is satisfied with his/her current symptom state. The PASS question has show to have sufficient rest re-test reliability in patients after orthopaedic surgery, with a reported kappa coefficient of 0.78. | 6 months after randomization | |
Secondary | Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) | The Patient Acceptable Symptom State is assessed by asking the participant the question: Taking into account all the activity you have during your daily life, your level of pain and also activity limitations and participation restrictions, do you consider the current state of your shoulder satisfactory?" The PSS question is answered "Yes" or "No". A response of "Yes" indicates that the individual is satisfied with his/her current symptom state. The PASS question has show to have sufficient rest re-test reliability in patients after orthopaedic surgery, with a reported kappa coefficient of 0.78. | 12 months after randomization | |
Secondary | Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) | The Patient Acceptable Symptom State is assessed by asking the participant the question: Taking into account all the activity you have during your daily life, your level of pain and also activity limitations and participation restrictions, do you consider the current state of your shoulder satisfactory?" The PSS question is answered "Yes" or "No". A response of "Yes" indicates that the individual is satisfied with his/her current symptom state. The PASS question has show to have sufficient rest re-test reliability in patients after orthopaedic surgery, with a reported kappa coefficient of 0.78. | 24 months after randomization | |
Secondary | Functional Comorbidity Index | The Functional Comorbidity Index (FCI) is an 18-item measure assessing the presence of medical comorbidities. The FCI is a self-administered report of medical comorbidities associated with physicla function. Using medical comorbidities is an important factor in creating risk adjustment models for orthopaedic trauma. The FCI was found to demonstrate a stronger association with the SF-36 physical function subscale (R2 = 0.29) than the Charleston (R2 = 0.18) and Kaplan-Feinstein (R2 = 0.17) indices. When individuals were classified into high and low function based ont he SF-36, the FCI correctly classified 77% of the cases. | 3 months after surgery | |
Secondary | Functional Comorbidity Index | The Functional Comorbidity Index (FCI) is an 18-item measure assessing the presence of medical comorbidities. The FCI is a self-administered report of medical comorbidities associated with physicla function. Using medical comorbidities is an important factor in creating risk adjustment models for orthopaedic trauma. The FCI was found to demonstrate a stronger association with the SF-36 physical function subscale (R2 = 0.29) than the Charleston (R2 = 0.18) and Kaplan-Feinstein (R2 = 0.17) indices. When individuals were classified into high and low function based ont he SF-36, the FCI correctly classified 77% of the cases. | 6 months after surgery | |
Secondary | Functional Comorbidity Index | The Functional Comorbidity Index (FCI) is an 18-item measure assessing the presence of medical comorbidities. The FCI is a self-administered report of medical comorbidities associated with physicla function. Using medical comorbidities is an important factor in creating risk adjustment models for orthopaedic trauma. The FCI was found to demonstrate a stronger association with the SF-36 physical function subscale (R2 = 0.29) than the Charleston (R2 = 0.18) and Kaplan-Feinstein (R2 = 0.17) indices. When individuals were classified into high and low function based ont he SF-36, the FCI correctly classified 77% of the cases. | 12 months after surgery | |
Secondary | Functional Comorbidity Index | The Functional Comorbidity Index (FCI) is an 18-item measure assessing the presence of medical comorbidities. The FCI is a self-administered report of medical comorbidities associated with physicla function. Using medical comorbidities is an important factor in creating risk adjustment models for orthopaedic trauma. The FCI was found to demonstrate a stronger association with the SF-36 physical function subscale (R2 = 0.29) than the Charleston (R2 = 0.18) and Kaplan-Feinstein (R2 = 0.17) indices. When individuals were classified into high and low function based ont he SF-36, the FCI correctly classified 77% of the cases. | 24 months after surgery | |
Secondary | Passive Range of Motion of the Shoulder | The range of passive elevation and external rotation and internal rotation of both shoulders will be measured with a goniometer. Range of motion measurements to the nearest 1 degree will be made with a large clear plastic gonionometer marked in 1 degree increments. | 3 months after surgery | |
Secondary | Passive Range of Motion of the Shoulder | The range of passive elevation and external rotation and internal rotation of both shoulders will be measured with a goniometer. Range of motion measurements to the nearest 1 degree will be made with a large clear plastic gonionometer marked in 1 degree increments. | 4 months after surgery | |
Secondary | Passive Range of Motion of the Shoulder | The range of passive elevation and external rotation and internal rotation of both shoulders will be measured with a goniometer. Range of motion measurements to the nearest 1 degree will be made with a large clear plastic gonionometer marked in 1 degree increments. | 6 months after surgery | |
Secondary | Isometric Muscle Strength of the Shoulder | Isometric muscle strength of shoulder will be assessed in 5 positions (external rotation at 0 degrees, external rotation at 90 degrees, internal rotation at 0 degrees, internal rotation at 90 degrees and scapular plane abduction at 90 degrees) using a hand-held dynamometer. | 3 months after surgery | |
Secondary | Isometric Muscle Strength of the Shoulder | Isometric muscle strength of shoulder will be assessed in 5 positions (external rotation at 0 degrees, external rotation at 90 degrees, internal rotation at 0 degrees, internal rotation at 90 degrees and scapular plane abduction at 90 degrees) using a hand-held dynamometer. | 4 months after surgery | |
Secondary | Isometric Muscle Strength of the Shoulder | Isometric muscle strength of shoulder will be assessed in 5 positions (external rotation at 0 degrees, external rotation at 90 degrees, internal rotation at 0 degrees, internal rotation at 90 degrees and scapular plane abduction at 90 degrees) using a hand-held dynamometer. | 6 months after surgery | |
Secondary | Performance on Functional Tests of the Upper Extremity - Closed Kinetic Chain Upper Extremity Stability test | Closed Kinetic Chain Upper Extremity Stability test: Participants take a full pushup position. They alternatingly touch each hand with the other, as fast as they can, for 15 seconds. Number of touches in 15 seconds.Three trials will be performed and the average value will be calculated. | 4 months after surgery | |
Secondary | Performance on Functional Tests of the Upper Extremity - Closed Kinetic Chain Upper Extremity Stability test | Closed Kinetic Chain Upper Extremity Stability test: Participants take a full pushup position. They alternatingly touch each hand with the other, as fast as they can, for 15 seconds. Number of touches in 15 seconds.Three trials will be performed and the average value will be calculated. | 6 months after surgery | |
Secondary | Performance on Functional Tests of the Upper Extremity - Unilateral Seated Shot-Put test | Unilateral Seated Shot-Put test: Distance of shot-put recorded in centimeters. The distance a 2.72 kg medicine ball is pushed, from block against participant's back to the site of ball contact on the floor. The participant will complete three trials for each arm, with the average of 3 trials being used for analysis. | 4 months after surgery | |
Secondary | Performance on Functional Tests of the Upper Extremity - Unilateral Seated Shot-Put test | Unilateral Seated Shot-Put test: Distance of shot-put recorded in centimeters. The distance a 2.72 kg medicine ball is pushed, from block against participant's back to the site of ball contact on the floor. The participant will complete three trials for each arm, with the average of 3 trials being used for analysis. | 6 months after surgery | |
Secondary | Performance on Functional Tests of the Upper Extremity - Push-ups | Push-ups: Number of push-ups that can be completed in 60 seconds is counted. The test is performed twice and the higher number of repetitions achieved is recorded. | 4 months after surgery | |
Secondary | Performance on Functional Tests of the Upper Extremity - Push-ups | Push-ups: Number of push-ups that can be completed in 60 seconds is counted. The test is performed twice and the higher number of repetitions achieved is recorded. | 6 months after surgery | |
Secondary | Performance on Functional Tests of the Upper Extremity - Weighted Overhead Ball Throw | Weighted Overhead Ball Throw: Participant will throw a 9.07 kg medicine ball overhead, with both hands. Distance of throw recorded in centimeters. Three trials will be performed. | 4 months after surgery | |
Secondary | Performance on Functional Tests of the Upper Extremity - Weighted Overhead Ball Throw | Weighted Overhead Ball Throw: Participant will throw a 9.07 kg medicine ball overhead, with both hands. Distance of throw recorded in centimeters. Three trials will be performed. | 6 months after surgery | |
Secondary | Performance on Functional Tests of the Upper Extremity - Upper Quarter Y-Balance test | Upper Quarter Y-Balance test: Maximum reach in 3 directions (medial, inferolateral, and superolateral), recorded in centimeters. Subjects stand in a three-point plank position with the tested shoulder perpendicular to the hand and the feet shoulder-width apart. Three test trials will be performed on each side with 30 seconds of rest in between each trial. A normalized composite score is the mean of the average distance in all three reach directions. | 4 months after surgery | |
Secondary | Performance on Functional Tests of the Upper Extremity - Upper Quarter Y-Balance test | Upper Quarter Y-Balance test: Maximum reach in 3 directions (medial, inferolateral, and superolateral), recorded in centimeters. Subjects stand in a three-point plank position with the tested shoulder perpendicular to the hand and the feet shoulder-width apart. Three test trials will be performed on each side with 30 seconds of rest in between each trial. A normalized composite score is the mean of the average distance in all three reach directions. | 6 months after surgery | |
Secondary | Clinical Measures after Surgical Stabilization - Pain | Pain: Pain intensity will be recorded utilizing an 11-point numeric pain scale (NPRS) that ranges from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain). Th current, least, and worst pain intensity in the past 24 hours will be recorded and summed to create a pain score that ranges from 0 to 30. | 2 weeks after surgery | |
Secondary | Clinical Measures after Surgical Stabilization - Pain | Pain: Pain intensity will be recorded utilizing an 11-point numeric pain scale (NPRS) that ranges from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain). Th current, least, and worst pain intensity in the past 24 hours will be recorded and summed to create a pain score that ranges from 0 to 30. | 6 weeks +/- 2 weeks after surgery | |
Secondary | Clinical Measures after Surgical Stabilization - Pain | Pain: Pain intensity will be recorded utilizing an 11-point numeric pain scale (NPRS) that ranges from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain). Th current, least, and worst pain intensity in the past 24 hours will be recorded and summed to create a pain score that ranges from 0 to 30. | 3 months after surgery | |
Secondary | Clinical Measures after Surgical Stabilization - Pain | Pain: Pain intensity will be recorded utilizing an 11-point numeric pain scale (NPRS) that ranges from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain). Th current, least, and worst pain intensity in the past 24 hours will be recorded and summed to create a pain score that ranges from 0 to 30. | 5 months +/- month after surgery | |
Secondary | Clinical Measures after Surgical Stabilization - Pain | Pain: Pain intensity will be recorded utilizing an 11-point numeric pain scale (NPRS) that ranges from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain). Th current, least, and worst pain intensity in the past 24 hours will be recorded and summed to create a pain score that ranges from 0 to 30. | 12 months after surgery | |
Secondary | Clinical Measures after Surgical Stabilization - Pain Medication Usage | Pain Medication Usage: At follow-up visit, current narcotic pain medication usage is recorded. Usage (Yes/No): If "Yes," name of medication, dose, frequency of use, and indication is noted. | 2 weeks after surgery | |
Secondary | Clinical Measures after Surgical Stabilization - Pain Medication Usage | Pain Medication Usage: At follow-up visit, current narcotic pain medication usage is recorded. Usage (Yes/No): If "Yes," name of medication, dose, frequency of use, and indication is noted. | 6 weeks +/- 2 weeks after surgery | |
Secondary | Clinical Measures after Surgical Stabilization - Pain Medication Usage | Pain Medication Usage: At follow-up visit, current narcotic pain medication usage is recorded. Usage (Yes/No): If "Yes," name of medication, dose, frequency of use, and indication is noted. | 3 months after surgery | |
Secondary | Clinical Measures after Surgical Stabilization - Pain Medication Usage | Pain Medication Usage: At follow-up visit, current narcotic pain medication usage is recorded. Usage (Yes/No): If "Yes," name of medication, dose, frequency of use, and indication is noted. | 5 months +/- month after surgery | |
Secondary | Clinical Measures after Surgical Stabilization - Pain Medication Usage | Pain Medication Usage: At follow-up visit, current narcotic pain medication usage is recorded. Usage (Yes/No): If "Yes," name of medication, dose, frequency of use, and indication is noted. | 12 months after surgery | |
Secondary | Clinical Measures after Surgical Stabilization - Use of Post-op Brace | Use of Post-op Brace: Usage (Yes/No): If "No," date brace was discontinued will be recorded. | 2 weeks after surgery | |
Secondary | Clinical Measures after Surgical Stabilization - Use of Post-op Brace | Use of Post-op Brace: Usage (Yes/No): If "No," date brace was discontinued will be recorded. | 6 weeks +/- 2 weeks after surgery | |
Secondary | Clinical Measures after Surgical Stabilization - Use of Post-op Brace | Use of Post-op Brace: Usage (Yes/No): If "No," date brace was discontinued will be recorded. | 3 months after surgery | |
Secondary | Clinical Measures after Surgical Stabilization - Use of Post-op Brace | Use of Post-op Brace: Usage (Yes/No): If "No," date brace was discontinued will be recorded. | 5 months +/- month after surgery | |
Secondary | Clinical Measures after Surgical Stabilization - Use of Post-op Brace | Use of Post-op Brace: Usage (Yes/No): If "No," date brace was discontinued will be recorded. | 12 months after surgery | |
Secondary | Clinical Measures after Surgical Stabilization - Wound Status | Wound Status: At follow-up visit, wound status recorded as healed, healing, draining, open, erythema or presence of a superficial wound infection. | 2 weeks after surgery | |
Secondary | Clinical Measures after Surgical Stabilization - Wound Status | Wound Status: At follow-up visit, wound status recorded as healed, healing, draining, open, erythema or presence of a superficial wound infection. | 6 weeks +/- 2 weeks after surgery | |
Secondary | Clinical Measures after Surgical Stabilization - Wound Status | Wound Status: At follow-up visit, wound status recorded as healed, healing, draining, open, erythema or presence of a superficial wound infection. | 3 months after surgery | |
Secondary | Clinical Measures after Surgical Stabilization - Wound Status | Wound Status: At follow-up visit, wound status recorded as healed, healing, draining, open, erythema or presence of a superficial wound infection. | 5 months +/- month after surgery | |
Secondary | Clinical Measures after Surgical Stabilization - Wound Status | Wound Status: At follow-up visit, wound status recorded as healed, healing, draining, open, erythema or presence of a superficial wound infection. | 12 months after surgery | |
Secondary | Clinical Measures after Surgical Stabilization - Neurovascular status | Neurovascular status: Assessment of neurovascular status will include assessment of pulses, sensation to pain, and distal motor function. Brachial pulses will be recorded as symmetrical, diminished, or absent. Sensation to pain will be recorded as normal, diminished or absent. Distal motor function of the wrist will be recorded as strong/symmetrical to the contralateral arm, diminished, or absent. | 2 weeks after surgery | |
Secondary | Clinical Measures after Surgical Stabilization - Neurovascular status | Neurovascular status: Assessment of neurovascular status will include assessment of pulses, sensation to pain, and distal motor function. Brachial pulses will be recorded as symmetrical, diminished, or absent. Sensation to pain will be recorded as normal, diminished or absent. Distal motor function of the wrist will be recorded as strong/symmetrical to the contralateral arm, diminished, or absent. | 6 weeks +/- 2 weeks after surgery | |
Secondary | Clinical Measures after Surgical Stabilization - Neurovascular status | Neurovascular status: Assessment of neurovascular status will include assessment of pulses, sensation to pain, and distal motor function. Brachial pulses will be recorded as symmetrical, diminished, or absent. Sensation to pain will be recorded as normal, diminished or absent. Distal motor function of the wrist will be recorded as strong/symmetrical to the contralateral arm, diminished, or absent. | 3 months after surgery | |
Secondary | Clinical Measures after Surgical Stabilization - Neurovascular status | Neurovascular status: Assessment of neurovascular status will include assessment of pulses, sensation to pain, and distal motor function. Brachial pulses will be recorded as symmetrical, diminished, or absent. Sensation to pain will be recorded as normal, diminished or absent. Distal motor function of the wrist will be recorded as strong/symmetrical to the contralateral arm, diminished, or absent. | 5 months +/- month after surgery | |
Secondary | Clinical Measures after Surgical Stabilization - Neurovascular status | Neurovascular status: Assessment of neurovascular status will include assessment of pulses, sensation to pain, and distal motor function. Brachial pulses will be recorded as symmetrical, diminished, or absent. Sensation to pain will be recorded as normal, diminished or absent. Distal motor function of the wrist will be recorded as strong/symmetrical to the contralateral arm, diminished, or absent. | 12 months after surgery | |
Secondary | Clinical Measures after Surgical Stabilization - Additional Diagnostic Tests | Additional Diagnostic Tests: At follow-up visit, any additional diagnostic tests will be recorded. (Yes/No): If "Yes," the test, date and indication will be recorded. | 2 weeks after surgery | |
Secondary | Clinical Measures after Surgical Stabilization - Additional Diagnostic Tests | Additional Diagnostic Tests: At follow-up visit, any additional diagnostic tests will be recorded. (Yes/No): If "Yes," the test, date and indication will be recorded. | 3 months after surgery | |
Secondary | Clinical Measures after Surgical Stabilization - Additional Diagnostic Tests | Additional Diagnostic Tests: At follow-up visit, any additional diagnostic tests will be recorded. (Yes/No): If "Yes," the test, date and indication will be recorded. | 5 months +/- month after surgery | |
Secondary | Clinical Measures after Surgical Stabilization - Additional Diagnostic Tests | Additional Diagnostic Tests: At follow-up visit, any additional diagnostic tests will be recorded. (Yes/No): If "Yes," the test, date and indication will be recorded | 12 months after surgery |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05635240 -
Chronic Anterior Shoulder Instability in the Military
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT02913352 -
Latarjet Versus Modified Eden-Hybinette for Anterior Shoulder Dislocation
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03154957 -
Management of Acute Dislocation of Emergency in the University Hospital of Strasbourg Shoulder: Retrospective Evaluation of Practices and Proposal of a Clinical Path
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT02510625 -
The Arthroscopic Treatment of Recurrent Anterior Shoulder Instability
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00707018 -
Immobilization in External Rotation After First Time Anterior Shoulder Dislocation
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04887337 -
Early arthroscoPic Stabilization veRsus rehabilitatiOn of the Shoulder in Adolescents With a trauMatic First-time Anterior Shoulder Dislocation ePisode
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04960137 -
Shoulder Dislocations Treated With Button Plates and Non-absorbable Suture Anchor
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05388942 -
Virtual Reality Hypnosis Versus Inhaled Nitrous Oxide in Anterior Shoulder Dislocation Reduction: an Open Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02725333 -
Does Shoulder Stabilizations Stabilize Shoulders?
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05705479 -
Shoulder Instability Trial Comparing Arthroscopic Stabilization Benefits Compared With Latarjet Procedure Evaluation - STABLE Definitive Trial
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05048303 -
Multicenter Clinical Cohort Study of Modified Flexible Fixation Latarjet Procedure for Recurrent Shoulder Dislocation
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03453710 -
Remplissage Versus Latarjet Coracoid Transfer for Recurrent Shoulder Instability
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04952636 -
A Prospective Comparative Study of Arthroscopic and Open Surgery in Cuistow Procedure
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00251264 -
Arthroscopic Versus Open Stabilization for Traumatic Shoulder Instability
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT02426996 -
The Latarjet-type Procedure Using the SEM Positioner: Using a Scan to Assess Consolidation
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04022629 -
ASSET 2 Study: Long-Term Follow-up of a Randomised Control Trial
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
Terminated |
NCT04820491 -
Efficient Anterior Shoulder Ultrasound Reduction Multicenter Prospective Randomized Trial
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05443295 -
Improvement of Fatigue in Unstable Shoulder Through a Therapeutic Exercise Program in Physiotherapy
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT06459258 -
Throwing Velocity and Patient Reported Outcomes in Elite Level Handball Players After Completion of Shoulder-Pacemaker Strength Training
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04479397 -
Sling vs Nothing After Latarjet Procedure
|
N/A |