Interscalene Nerve Block vs. Sedation for Shoulder Dislocation Reduction

Shoulder Dislocation Clinical Trial

Official title:

US Guided Interscalene Block Compared With Sedation for Shoulder Dislocation Reduction in the ER

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Not yet recruiting

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT03041506
• Other study ID #: TASMC-16-IM-0221-CTIL
• Status: Not yet recruiting
• Phase: N/A
• First received: January 22, 2017
• Last updated: February 5, 2017
• Start date: February 15, 2017
• Est. completion date: December 31, 2018

Study information

• Verified date: February 2017
• Source: Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center
• Contact: Idit Matot, MD
• Phone: 97236974758
• Email: iditm[@]tlvmc.gov.il
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Shoulder dislocation is the most common joint dislocation presented to the emergency room (ER) and reduction by medical team is always needed. Shoulder dislocation and reduction are often very painful and require some form of sedation, pain relief and muscle relaxation for reduction maneuvers. Several sedation protocols for reduction maneuver are described in the literature, and each institution is guided by its own protocol to optimize patient comfort and safety. At the Tel Aviv Medical Centre (TLVMC) ER sedation with ketamine and midazolam are the mainstay form of sedation for shoulder dislocation reduction.

Sedation is not without risk, it is time consuming for the medical staff, and need personal supervision. Sedation under busy ER conditions can cause a burden to the medical team which can end up in treatment insufficiency and patient safety failure.

Ultrasound (US) guided interscalene block (ISCB) for shoulder surgery was found to be an effective method for perioperative analgesia. However, there is limited data on performance of US guided ISCB for shoulder dislocation reduction and its comparison to other analgesic modalities Both techniques (block and sedation) for shoulder dislocation procedure are being performed for two years at the TLVMC, however no study was done to evaluate these two analgesic modalities.

The current study compares sedation vs. US guided ISCB for the treatment of shoulder dislocation in the ER at the TLVMC.

Study objective:

Comparison of two common analgesic methods, Sedation vs. US guided ISCB, for shoulder dislocation reduction in our institution.

Study design:

This is a prospective, randomized, interventional, open-label study with two arms- Sedation group and US guided ISCB group. The sedation will be conducted by the orthopedic surgeon who is certified to perform sedation and the US guided ISCB will be conducted by a certified anesthesiologist.

Primary outcome:

Time frame measured from the beginning of reduction procedure until readiness for dismissal from the ER according to the physician decision.

Secondary outcomes [short list]:

Visual Analogue Score (VAS), patient satisfaction, complications, US guided ISCB and sedation failure rate, overall reduction success rate, readmission rate to the ER, daily activity level measured by Quick DASH (Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand) outcome measure.

Description:

Shoulder dislocation is the most prevalent dislocation with a frequency of 0.5%-1.7% among the population, which requires reduction by medical staff in the emergency room (ER). Reduction procedure is often painful and require some level of sedation, analgesia, and muscle relaxation for its completeness. Several sedation protocols for reduction maneuver are described in the literature, and each institution is guided by its own protocol to optimize patient comfort and safety.

The literature describes multiple sedative agents such as Propofol, Etomidate, Midazolam, Fentanyl, etc. In the emergency department (ED) at Tel Aviv Medical Center (TLVMC), the sedation protocol contains Midazolam and Ketamine as the main sedative and analgesic agents.

Sedation is not without a risk. Known complications are respiratory depression, aspiration, and hemodynamic instability. These complications seem to be more prevalent in patients with decreased cardio-respiratory reserves, such as elderly, morbid obese, obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and congestive heart failure (CHF) patients.

In addition, sedation requires resources such a facility occupied with equipment for monitoring vitals, oxygen supply source, capnography and human resources including medical staff certified to provide sedation and handle any possible complication and nursing staff supervising the patient throughout the procedure from admission until release home from the ER.

The ED at the TLVMC is very active and busy throughout the day. Sedation under such condition create a real challenge for the medical team. This is translated into shortage in manpower and equipment availability and time needed to care for each patient. Such an atmosphere create huge burden on the medical team which can end up in treatment insufficiency and patient safety failure.

Recently, several new publications were published regarding the implementation of peripheral nerve block (PNB) under US guidance for analgesia and painful orthopedic procedure in the ER. Implementation of PNB for pain management in orthopedic procedures in the ER might constitute theoretical advantages over sedation.

Interscalene block (ISCB) is a very effective tool being used during shoulder surgery. However, there is limited data on performance of US guided ISCB for shoulder dislocation reduction and it's comparison with other analgesic modalities.Only one study to date compared sedation vs. US guided ISCB for shoulder dislocation reduction procedure in the ER. This study showed that patients who received ISCB had a shorter length of stay in the ER and required less supervision and medical intervention from the medical team.

Both US guided ISCB and sedation for shoulder dislocation procedure are being performed for a while at TLVMC. However no study was done to evaluate them and determine if one of the analgesic modality have any advantages over the other.

Objectives:

Comparison of two common analgesic methods, US guided ISCB vs.sedation, for shoulder dislocation reduction in the ER at the TLVMC.

Methods and Materials

Study Design:

This is a prospective, randomized, interventional non-blinded study with two arms- US guided ISCB group and Sedation group.

The sedation will be conducted by an orthopedic physician certified to perform sedation and the US guided ISCB will be conducted by an anesthesiologist who has at least one year of experience preforming regional anesthesia using US guidance.

Sample Size:

The study will include 70 subjects - 35 in each group. In order to compensate for dropouts we will aim for recruitment of 90 subjects.

Statistical Analysis:

Quantitative data with normal distribution will be evaluated using t-test for independent samples. In case the assumptions for parametric test will not hold true, quantitative data will be evaluated using an a- parametric Mann-Whitney test. Quantitative variables will be presented as mean and standard deviation.

Dichotomous data will be evaluated using chi-square test. Fischer exact test will be used when more than 20% of the expected observations were less than 5 or any expected observation was less than 2.

Categorical data will be presented as a number of cases and percent. Multivariate logistic regression analysis will be used for the primary outcome in order to determine independent risk factors. The data included in the multivariate logistic regression model will have a clinical significance according to the investigator clinical judgment and data found to have a Pv<0.1 in the univariate analysis. A Pv of 0.05 will be considered significant.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Not yet recruiting
• Enrollment: 90
• Est. completion date: December 31, 2018
• Est. primary completion date: December 31, 2017
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

1. Patients (ASA SCORE I-III) without acute cardio-pulmonary decompensation, who arrive to the ER with shoulder dislocation for reduction maneuver.

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Unconscious patient

2. Patient refusal/unable to give informed consent

3. Patients with acute cardio-pulmonary decompensation

4. Patients with known allergy to medications which will be included in the study

5. Patients who suffer additional injuries and need to be hospitalized for further treatment

6. Patients who received narcotic/sedative premedication before the procedure

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Brachial Plexus Block
• Dislocations
• Shoulder Dislocation

Intervention

Drug:
• Lidocaine
Infiltration of local anesthetic agents around target nerves (C5, C6 nerve roots), US guidance, for shoulder pain relief and muscle relaxation. Lidocaine 2%: 15 -20 ml.

Procedure:
• US guided ISCB
Infiltration of local anesthetic agents around target nerves (C5, C6 nerve roots), US guidance, for shoulder pain relief and muscle relaxation. Lidocaine 2%: 15 -20 ml.

Drug:
• Midazolam
IV administration up to a maximum dosage of 0.1 mg/kg (bolus of 1 mg by titration every 30-60 seconds) for sedation and pain relief.
• Ketamine
IV administration up to maximum dosage of 100 mg IV (bolus of 25 mg by titration every 30-60 seconds) for sedation and pain relief.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
n/a

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center

References & Publications (16)

Abrahams MS, Aziz MF, Fu RF, Horn JL. Ultrasound guidance compared with electrical neurostimulation for peripheral nerve block: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Br J Anaesth. 2009 Mar;102(3):408-17. doi: 10.1093/bja/aen384. Review. — View Citation

Beaudoin FL, Nagdev A, Merchant RC, Becker BM. Ultrasound-guided femoral nerve blocks in elderly patients with hip fractures. Am J Emerg Med. 2010 Jan;28(1):76-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2008.09.015. — View Citation

Blaivas M, Adhikari S, Lander L. A prospective comparison of procedural sedation and ultrasound-guided interscalene nerve block for shoulder reduction in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 2011 Sep;18(9):922-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01140.x. — View Citation

Blaivas M, Lyon M. Ultrasound-guided interscalene block for shoulder dislocation reduction in the ED. Am J Emerg Med. 2006 May;24(3):293-6. — View Citation

Borgeat A, Ekatodramis G. Anaesthesia for shoulder surgery. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2002 Jun;16(2):211-25. Review. — View Citation

Burton JH, Bock AJ, Strout TD, Marcolini EG. Etomidate and midazolam for reduction of anterior shoulder dislocation: a randomized, controlled trial. Ann Emerg Med. 2002 Nov;40(5):496-504. — View Citation

Davis JJ, Swenson JD, Greis PE, Burks RT, Tashjian RZ. Interscalene block for postoperative analgesia using only ultrasound guidance: the outcome in 200 patients. J Clin Anesth. 2009 Jun;21(4):272-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2008.08.022. — View Citation

Liu SS, Zayas VM, Gordon MA, Beathe JC, Maalouf DB, Paroli L, Liguori GA, Ortiz J, Buschiazzo V, Ngeow J, Shetty T, Ya Deau JT. A prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing ultrasound versus nerve stimulator guidance for interscalene block for ambulatory shoulder surgery for postoperative neurological symptoms. Anesth Analg. 2009 Jul;109(1):265-71. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181a3272c. — View Citation

Matthews DE, Roberts T. Intraarticular lidocaine versus intravenous analgesic for reduction of acute anterior shoulder dislocations. A prospective randomized study. Am J Sports Med. 1995 Jan-Feb;23(1):54-8. — View Citation

Neal JM, Barrington MJ, Brull R, Hadzic A, Hebl JR, Horlocker TT, Huntoon MA, Kopp SL, Rathmell JP, Watson JC. The Second ASRA Practice Advisory on Neurologic Complications Associated With Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine: Executive Summary 2015. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2015 Sep-Oct;40(5):401-30. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000286. — View Citation

Orlinsky M, Shon S, Chiang C, Chan L, Carter P. Comparative study of intra-articular lidocaine and intravenous meperidine/diazepam for shoulder dislocations. J Emerg Med. 2002 Apr;22(3):241-5. — View Citation

Perron AD, Ingerski MS, Brady WJ, Erling BF, Ullman EA. Acute complications associated with shoulder dislocation at an academic Emergency Department. J Emerg Med. 2003 Feb;24(2):141-5. — View Citation

Reid N, Stella J, Ryan M, Ragg M. Use of ultrasound to facilitate accurate femoral nerve block in the emergency department. Emerg Med Australas. 2009 Apr;21(2):124-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2009.01163.x. — View Citation

Roback MG, Wathen JE, Bajaj L, Bothner JP. Adverse events associated with procedural sedation and analgesia in a pediatric emergency department: a comparison of common parenteral drugs. Acad Emerg Med. 2005 Jun;12(6):508-13. — View Citation

Singelyn FJ, Lhotel L, Fabre B. Pain relief after arthroscopic shoulder surgery: a comparison of intraarticular analgesia, suprascapular nerve block, and interscalene brachial plexus block. Anesth Analg. 2004 Aug;99(2):589-92, table of contents. — View Citation

Taylor DM, O'Brien D, Ritchie P, Pasco J, Cameron PA. Propofol versus midazolam/fentanyl for reduction of anterior shoulder dislocation. Acad Emerg Med. 2005 Jan;12(1):13-9. — View Citation

* Note: There are 16 references in all — Click here to view all references

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Length of stay measured in minutes from the beginning of shoulder dislocation reduction procedure until the subject is ready for discharge from the ER according to the physician decision		Up to 3 hours from shoulder dislocation reduction procedure
Secondary	Visual Analogue Score (VAS) before the shoulder dislocation reduction procedure		Baseline
Secondary	Visual Analogue Score (VAS) when subject is ready for discharge from the ER according to the physician decision		When subject is ready for discharge from the ER according to the physician decision, up to 3 hours from shoulder dislocation reduction procedure
Secondary	Patient satisfaction from shoulder dislocation reduction procedure when subject is ready for discharge from the ER according to the physician decision		When subject is ready for discharge from the ER according to the physician decision, up to 3 hours from shoulder dislocation reduction procedure
Secondary	Side effect and complications related to US guided ISCB during shoulder dislocation reduction procedure	Pneumothorax - clinical symptoms of dyspnea, hypoxemia, tachypnea + radiologic confirmation of pneumothorax; Local anesthetic systemic toxicity - clinical symptoms range from tinnitus, metallic taste, seizures, loss of consciousness, cardiac arrhythmias, and cardiac arrest; Intrathecal injection - local anesthetics penetrate into the subarachnoid space resulting in high spinal anesthesia; Intravascular puncture - blood appear in the syringe; Horner syndrome - ptosis, miosis and anhydrosis ipsilateral to the side of the ISCB; Hoarseness - voice change; Respiratory failure - phrenic nerve blockade with resultant diaphragmatic paresis in the ipsilateral side of the ISCB; Neurologic injury - sensory or motor deficit after ISCB	During shoulder dislocation reduction procedure
Secondary	Complications related to sedation during shoulder dislocation reduction procedure	Respiratory complications - aspiration with signs of fluid or food regurgitation respiratory depression and upper airway obstruction; Hemodynamic instability - cardiac arrhythmias and hypotension	During shoulder dislocation reduction procedure
Secondary	Failed US guided ISCB rate (preceded by sedation) during shoulder dislocation reduction procedure	Failed ISCB - no loss of cold sensation over the blocked shoulder and no pain relief after ISCB	During shoulder dislocation reduction procedure
Secondary	Overall success rate for shoulder dislocation reduction procedure	Success full shoulder reduction - confirmed by an X ray study	During shoulder dislocation reduction procedure
Secondary	Easiness of shoulder dislocation reduction procedure assessed by orthopedic physician	The orthopedic physician will be asked to describe his/her personal difficulty to perform the shoulder dislocation reduction procedure Severity score: 1-Easy; 2-Relatively easy; 3-Moderate; 4-Moderate to severe; 5-Severe	During shoulder dislocation reduction procedure
Secondary	Failed sedation rate (preceded by general anesthesia) during shoulder dislocation reduction procedure	Failed sedation - patient is uncooperative or in pain not allowing the orthopedic physician to perform reduction procedure	During shoulder dislocation reduction procedure
Secondary	Visual Analogue Score (VAS) 24 hours after readiness for dismissal from ER		24 hours after readiness for dismissal
Secondary	Readmission to the ER during 24 hours from readiness for dismissal from the ER	Any reason for patient readmission to the ER	During 24 hours from readiness for dismissal
Secondary	Limb daily activity level measured by "Quick DASH" score 72 hours from readiness for dismissal from the ER	Quick DASH is a questionnaire that measure upper limb daily activity level	72 hours from readiness for dismissal from the ER