View clinical trials related to Shoulder Dislocation.
Filter by:This is a pilot study designed as a prospective, randomized controlled trial comparing arthroscopic Bankart repair and Remplissage with an open Latarjet coracoid transfer for the treatment of recurrent anterior glenohumeral instability with subcritical bone loss.
There exists continued controversy over the use of propofol in Emergency Department procedural sedation, this is despite its widespread existence in clinical practice for at least a decade. These concerns are not limited to the ED setting and are primarily related to the pharmacological properties of the drug itself and its potential for harm. The bolus administration of propofol, aimed at a target of sedation, offers several advantages over more traditional agents, yet these advantages are also its limitations. The use of a target-controlled infusion may provide the sedationist with greater control over the pharmacokinetics of propofol and thus reduce the rate of adverse incidents. This feasibility study aims to use a pragmatic design to test the safety and efficacy of propofol TCI whilst assessing the practicalities of it's use in the ED. If it proves to be feasible then the researchers plan to proceed to a multi centre pilot study to gather information to adequately power a larger randomised multi centre trial.
The arthroscopic subscapular sling procedure is a new technique for shoulder stabilization, which has been developed in human cadaveric studies by Klungsøyr et al, but has yet to be tested clinically. The procedure stabilizes the shoulder by using a semitendinosus graft that makes a new labrum and a sling around the subscapular tendon. Extensive biomechanical robotic testing of the procedure shows significant less translation and thus better stability of the humeral head with the sling compared to a normal Bankart repair. The investigators consider the biomechanical results after robotic testing sufficient to advocate a planned pilot study in humans. In this pilot study the clinical and radiological results of the sling will be investigated in a small number of cases. The safety of the subscapular sling procedure will be assessed. This studies results are expected to be a further step towards implementation of the sling procedure as a surgical option for shoulder instability.
The purpose of the trial is investigate the benefits of a novel, newly invented exercise technique protocol relative to physiological changes in upper limb proprioception (primary) and subjective readiness for return to sport (secondary). The intervention (Overhead perturbation training) will be compared with a control intervention (non-perturbed stimulus) in a population of type II anterior glenohumeral joint instability patients (according to the Stanmore classification of instability). Each group will be assessed at baseline for glenohumeral joint proprioception (via lazer-pointer active relocation test), as well as perceived functional level (via Western Ontario Shoulder Instability index) and Shoulder Instability‑Return to Sport after Injury (SIRSI) score. They will then undertake a 6 week exercise regime which is exactly the same- except the intervention used perturbated stimulus and the control uses non-perturbed stimulus. Outcome measures are re-assessed at the end of the intervention period. Results will be assessed statistically for statistical significance.
A post market, non-randomized, multi-center, open-label,clinical study using survivorship to study the safety and efficacy of the Integra® TITAN™ Total Shoulder System 1.0 (TAS) when used for total shoulder arthroplasty.
The analysis of professional practices in the emergency department of the Strasbourg CHRU in the management of acute shoulder dislocations aims at proposing a clinical pathway of synthesis taking into account current practices and data from the literature. Thus, the objectives are twofold: first standardize care in emergency rooms and try to improve the weak points of this care.The Investigators will concentrate thier observation work on the medicinal analgesic methods proposed to these patients in order to minimize the pain induced by the external reduction maneuvers performed, in the majority of cases, in the emergencies. This work will ultimately have a real clinical impact on the management of these traumatized patients
Shoulder dislocation is the most common joint dislocation presented to the emergency room (ER) and reduction by medical team is always needed. Shoulder dislocation and reduction are often very painful and require some form of sedation, pain relief and muscle relaxation for reduction maneuvers. Several sedation protocols for reduction maneuver are described in the literature, and each institution is guided by its own protocol to optimize patient comfort and safety. At the Tel Aviv Medical Centre (TLVMC) ER sedation with ketamine and midazolam are the mainstay form of sedation for shoulder dislocation reduction. Sedation is not without risk, it is time consuming for the medical staff, and need personal supervision. Sedation under busy ER conditions can cause a burden to the medical team which can end up in treatment insufficiency and patient safety failure. Ultrasound (US) guided interscalene block (ISCB) for shoulder surgery was found to be an effective method for perioperative analgesia. However, there is limited data on performance of US guided ISCB for shoulder dislocation reduction and its comparison to other analgesic modalities Both techniques (block and sedation) for shoulder dislocation procedure are being performed for two years at the TLVMC, however no study was done to evaluate these two analgesic modalities. The current study compares sedation vs. US guided ISCB for the treatment of shoulder dislocation in the ER at the TLVMC. Study objective: Comparison of two common analgesic methods, Sedation vs. US guided ISCB, for shoulder dislocation reduction in our institution. Study design: This is a prospective, randomized, interventional, open-label study with two arms- Sedation group and US guided ISCB group. The sedation will be conducted by the orthopedic surgeon who is certified to perform sedation and the US guided ISCB will be conducted by a certified anesthesiologist. Primary outcome: Time frame measured from the beginning of reduction procedure until readiness for dismissal from the ER according to the physician decision. Secondary outcomes [short list]: Visual Analogue Score (VAS), patient satisfaction, complications, US guided ISCB and sedation failure rate, overall reduction success rate, readmission rate to the ER, daily activity level measured by Quick DASH (Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand) outcome measure.
Randomized clinical trial, parallel 1:1, comparing Latarjet to Modified Eden-Hybinette (iliac bone crest + capsular repair) for recurrent traumatic anterior glenohumeral dislocation.
Anterior dislocation of the shoulder (glenohumeral joint) is one of the most prevalent dislocations. Following a first dislocation recurrence rates of up to 80% have been reported. Many patients will seek medical assistance for reduction of the shoulder after each of these recurrent dislocations. The investigators describe the results of reduction of anterior glenohumeral dislocation using a modified self manipulated Milch technique that can be performed by the patients themselves after simple guidance and demonstration. This method is directed to patients who are not willing or cannot have surgical stabilization and may be in a place where medical assistance is not available.
Background: There is no evidence that shoulder stabilization effectively corrects the glenohumeral translation in unstable shoulders, explaining residual apprehension in certain patients. The purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of surgical stabilization on glenohumeral translation. Methods: Anteroposterior and superoinferior translations were assessed in patients, before and after shoulder stabilization, through a dedicated patient-specific measurement technique based on optical motion capture and computed tomography.