View clinical trials related to Shock.
Filter by:Septic shock and the underlying dysregulated inflammatory host-response remain a major contributor to mortality in critically ill patients. Cytokine adsorption represents an attractive approach to the treatment of septic shock. Nevertheless, its effect on circulating cytokine levels, as well as on the course of disease remains largely unassessed.
Cytokine hemoadsorption is a novel therapy used to improve outcome in critically ill patients with a dysregulated cytokine response and hemodynamic instability. Patients on extracorporeal membraneous oxygenation (ECMO) often develop severe systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS). Cytokine removal using different types of hemoadsorption devices is believed to block the vicious circle of inflammation dysregulation when other basic therapeutic measures fail. To date there are very limited reports on ECMO and cytokine hemoadsorption combination therapy. The aim of this retrospective study is to evaluate feasibility and effectiveness of hemoadsorption in veno-arterial and veno-venous ECMO patients.
The Oxiris membrane is an AN-69 membrane whose surface is treated with polyethyleneimine (PEI) grafted with heparin. This property allows the removal of lipopolysaccharide and cytokines from the blood. During septic shock, this membrane has shown its effectiveness and made it possible to decrease the doses of vasopressors administered, thus limiting the negative consequences of their use (low mesenteric flow in particular). Moreover, the literature suggests that the use of the Oxiris membrane does not lead to side effects or specific and serious complications, in comparison with conventional extra-renal purification membranes. To our knowledge (Pubmed, clinicaltrial) there are no data in patients in cardiogenic shock assisted by ECLS. The research hypothesis is that the early addition of an Oxiris membrane to the ECLS circuit allows the removal of lipopolysaccharides and pro-inflammatory cytokines, thus controlling the inflammatory cascade and limiting vasoplegia and organ failure.
Sepsis is a global healthcare burden sepsis, it reaches 20-30 million cases annually (WHO data). Numerous studies have shown that extracorporeal hemoperfusion therapies that eliminate endotoxin and\or excess of cytokines improve treatment outcomes in patients with septic shock. Aim of the study: to evaluate safety and feasibility of clinical use of an extracorporeal blood adsorber based on a hypercrosslinked styrene-divinylbenzene copolymer with immobilized lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-selective ligand designed to remove endotoxins from the bloodstream to treat patients with septic shock.
This is a monocentre randomized pilot study. All patients received two consecutive RRT: CVVHD with MCO filter (Ultraflux® EMiC®2) and post-Continuous Veno-Venous Hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) with HFF(AV1000S®) in a controlled randomized (1:1) blinded manner. Crossover randomized to sequence (A+B or B+A) for 48 h total without washout.
Sepsis is a global healthcare burden sepsis, it reaches 20-30 million cases annually (WHO data). Numerous studies have shown that extracorporeal hemoperfusion therapies that eliminate endotoxin and\or excess of cytokines improve treatment outcomes in patients with septic shock. The main purpose of the study is to obtain new data on the efficacy and safety of the Efferon LPS device in extracorporeal therapy in patients with abdominal sepsis complicated by septic shock.
This RCT is to investigate the clinical effect of extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) compared to the local corticosteroid injection (LCI) in managing mild to moderate carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS).
In this clinical trial the effect of early administration of Vitamin C is investigated in patients admitted at the emergency department with sepsis or septic shock. When a patient has sepsis, his/her body is causing damage to its own tissues and organs as result of an infection. This can lead to septic shock. The patient has a low blood pressure, his/her organs stop working and the patient may even die. The aim of this trial is to investigate the efficiency of Vitamin C in sepsis and septic shock. Vitamin C is a vitamin present in various foods and has been approved as dietary supplement by the Belgian authorities. Over the years it has been proven that Vitamin C is very safe. In addition, several studies have shown that Vitamin C can also have a protective effect. It can reduce organ damage and increase survival rates. Although several studies suggest that Vitamin C can help fight sepsis, it is not yet used in practice. This Belgian trial, in which several hospitals participate, hopes to provide a clear answer to the question: "Should Vitamin C be administered to patients admitted in an emergency department with sepsis or septic shock?"
Nepal and the South Asian sub-continent carry some of the highest rates of burn injury globally, with an associated high morbidity and mortality. Nepal currently has one major center equipped for burn care, in Kirtipur, Nepal and receives referred patients from around the country. At presentation, most patients with major burns have had minimal to no resuscitation on arrival, often hours to days after the burn injury was sustained. Timely fluid resuscitation, initiated as soon as possible after major burn injury, is the main tenet of acute burn care. Lack of adequate resuscitation in major burn injuries leads to kidney injury, progression of burn injury, sepsis, burn shock, and death. The current standard of care for major burn resuscitation is intravenous fluid resuscitation. In Nepal, however, adequately trained and equipped hospitals for treatment of burn care are not available (for a variety of reasons). Additionally, there is not a systematic emergency medical transport system available for provision of medical care and resuscitation during transport. Enteral-based resuscitation with substances like the WHO Oral Rehydration Solution (ORS) is recommended by burn experts and the professional burn societies when resources and access to intravenous fluid resuscitation are not available in resource-constrained settings such as rural areas, low- and middle-income countries, and military battlefield scenarios. Studies have previously demonstrated the efficacy and safety of enteral-based resuscitation in controlled, high-resource settings, however there have not been real-world effectiveness trials in austere settings. Therefore, the investigators seek to ultimately address the problem of pre-hospital and pre-burn center admission resuscitation by studying the feasibility and effectiveness of enteral resuscitation with Oral Rehydration Solution (ORS) in preventing burn shock. This study examines enteral (oral)-based resuscitation with ORS and IV Fluids versus only IV Fluids for the treatment of major burn injuries. The intervention portion of the study will entail randomization of patients presenting with acute burn injuries of 20-40% total body surface area (TBSA) to an enteral-based resuscitation versus the standard of care IV fluid resuscitation. The intervention will continue through the 24-72 hours of the acute resuscitation period. This is a feasibility study, primarily to develop and establish the research infrastructure and practices at the study site for future pilot study and eventually randomized-controlled trial research on this intervention. The primary outcomes will be measures of feasibility such as the adherence rate to the resuscitation protocols. Further, there will be a qualitative component to the study with focus group interviews of the bedside healthcare providers (doctors and nurses) who are caring for the enrolled patients, in order to understand the challenges and facilitators of enteral resuscitation. Qualitative analysis will be done to understand the major themes of challenges and facilitators to enteral resuscitation.
Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) has been used as a reference technique for CO measurement and its accuracy has been adequate for many clinical uses. TTE is painless, safe and non-invasive. Some drawbacks of TTE are being expensive, bulky and needs advanced training. Currently, due to increased interest in minimally invasive hemodynamic monitoring, multiple new methods have become commercially available to assess CO: the arterial pulse aortic flow, bioreactance, and bioimpedance. One of these new devices is LiDCOrapid (LiDCO Ltd, Cambridge, UK). It is a new, minimally invasive monitor which estimates beat-by-beat CO and fluid responsiveness from the arterial waveform. It has been validated after vascular, urological and thoracic surgery and shows good agreement with the PA catheter in swine, in patients with normal left ventricular systolic function and in patients with vasodilatation. However, LiDCO has not yet been validated in patients with septic shock. Therefore, the aim of this study is to validate LiDCOrapid parameters in septic shock patients using TTE derived parameters as the non-invasive reference.