View clinical trials related to Shock.
Filter by:Cardiogenic shock (CS) mortality remains high (40%). Despite their frequent use, few clinical outcome data are available to guide the initial selection of vasoactive drug therapies in patients with CS. Based on experts' opinions, the combination of norepinephrine-dobutamine is generally recommended as a first line strategy. Inotropic agents increase myocardial contractility, thereby increasing cardiac output. Dobutamine is commonly recommended to be the inotropic agent of choice and levosimendan is generally used following dobutamine failure. It may represent an ideal agent in cardiogenic shock, since it improves myocardial contractility without increasing cAMP or calcium concentration. At present, there are no convincing data to support a specific inotropic agent in patients with cardiogenic shock. Our hypothesis is that the early use of levosimendan, by enabling the discontinuation of dobutamine, would accelerate the resolution of signs of low cardiac output and facilitate myocardial recovery.
This prospective randomized single center study investigates to what extent the removal of elevated cytokine levels by hemoadsorption has a positive effect on the treatment of patients in septic shock by stabilizing the circulatory situation.
in this study the investigators aim to assess the role of using dexmedetomidine as sedative in septic shock patients in comparison with midazolam. The investigators aim to assess the effect on immune response and inflammatory mediators and effect on vasopressors.
Cardiogenic shock is a serious medical condition with high mortality and morbidity. This trial assesses safety, tolerability and efficacy of Adrecizumab on top of standard of care in patients with cardiogenic shock.
Cirrhotic patients have a poor outcome in intensive care unit (ICU). Septic shock is a leading cause of ICU admission and death in this specific population. We performed a monocentric retrospective study; all cirrhotic patients admitted in the ICU with septic shock from 2002 to 2013 were included. The aim of the study was to identify prognostic factors for both short- and long-term mortality in these patients. Demographic, clinical and biological data, organ supports, and outcomes were collected. Univariate and multivariate analysis were carried out regarding both ICU and one-year mortality.
Systemic hyperinflammatory states, e.g. triggered by infection/sepsis, represent a major challenge for modern medicine. After an initially localized onset, inflammation can extend to an excessive, uncontrolled inflammatory reaction affecting the entire body and can trigger circulatory failure with subsequent irreversible multiple organ failure. Despite all the medical advances made in recent years, sepsis continues to be a substantial problem, as almost all therapeutic approaches have failed to prove their efficacy to date. Mortality in this clinical entity thus remains extremely high. In Germany alone, more than 100,000 people suffer from sepsis or septic shock every year, nearly half of whom die despite optimal therapy. Thus, sepsis is the third most common cause of death, has major importance both from a medical but also from an economical viewpoint, and approaches that could contribute to its successful treatment need to be further developed and explored. If a patient experiences the spread of bacteria or their constituents in the blood stream due to an uncontrolled source of infection, the result is a deliberately triggered physiological defense reaction of the body. In many patients, however, there is a pathological dysregulation of these mechanisms, in a way that the defense reaction goes far beyond the physiological level required, resulting in an excessive immune response of the body, which is mainly facilitated by inflammatory mediators such as cytokines and chemokines. The immune response spreads throughout the body and also dissipates into organs unaffected by the original infection. In cases of such unwanted overshooting immune responses, an attempt to regain control of the described deleterious systemic events seems reasonable by removing the excess amount of cytokines from the blood, thus preventing or treating organ failure. In this context, current therapeutic approaches increasingly focus on the elimination of inflammatory mediators. In recent years, hemoadsorption, using a new adsorber (CytoSorb), has been used to treat sepsis and other conditions of hyperinflammation. The advantage of this therapeutic principle is that a wide range of inflammatory mediators are removed. In conjunction with the enormous elimination capacity, the effective and rapid reduction of mediators can be achieved. To date, there have been more than 61,000 treatments using this procedure worldwide without device-related side effects being reported. The investigators have been treating patients with this procedure for over 5 years with consistently very favorable results. Therefore, the investigators would like to expand and deepen their observations with the proposed project.
In recent years, many studies have pointed out that bacterial toxin and cytokine storm are the main causes of shock and multiple organ failure in patients with sepsis. Endotoxin is the main vehicle for systemic inflammatory reaction caused by gram-negative bacteria which induce sepsis. Endotoxin binds to Toll- Like receptor 4 (TLR4) trigger a cytokine storm. The amount of endotoxin is associated with shock, insufficient intestinal perfusion, and poor prognosis. Therefore, clinicians try to use various methods to antagonize the action of endotoxin, which can reduce the cytokine storm and inflammatory response to improve the prognosis of sepsis. Continuous venous venous hemofiltration plays a role in blood purification in septic shock. With different hemofiltration filters, it has different effects. By removing the inflammatory mediators caused by bacterial toxins and cytokines, shock can be improved. The study plans to receive patients with septic shock and use a hemofiltration filter that adsorbs endotoxin and removes cytokines (oXiris, Baxter Healthcare) to perform continuous venous venous hemofiltration in addition to basic septic shock resuscitation. The effect on the concentration of cytokines in the blood, the infusion dose of inotropics, the fluid balances, and the degree of organ damage was evaluated. It is hoped that the results of this pilot study can lead us to subsequent randomized clinical trials to explore whether this filter can improve the prognosis of septic shock patients.
Septic shock is common in patients admitted to intensive care and hospital mortality occurs in close to 50% of these patients. In half of the cases, death occurs within the first 72 hours in a context of multiple organ failure that does not respond to conventional therapies, particularly circulatory therapies, despite increasing doses of catecholamines. Vasopressor resistance in septic patients defines refractory septic shock. In one study (Conrad et al. 2015), the increase in blood pressure observed with an infusion of increasing doses of phenylephrine (dose-response curve) made it possible to quickly and clearly identify patients resistant to vasopressors at a high risk of death by refractory shock (ROC AUC 0.92). This resistance is due in particular to a downregulation of α1 adrenergic receptors, linked to sympathetic hyper activation associated with septic shock. To date, there is no validated therapy in this situation. However, experimental data have shown that the administration of α2 agonists, usually used for their sedative (dexmedetomidine) or anti-hypertensive (clonidine) effect, normalizes sympathetic activity towards basal values. In animals, α2 agonists restore the sensitivity of alpha1 adrenergic receptors, resulting in improved vasopressor sensitivity and survival. In humans, a beneficial effect on mortality was suggested in the first trial testing dexmedetomidine in septic patients in 2017. This effect was observed especially in the most severe patients, suggesting a restoration of sensitivity to vasopressors. The hypothesis is that the administration of dexmedetomidine in patients in refractory septic shock may improve response to phenylephrine and decrease resistance to vasopressors. This pilot study could lay the foundation for a randomized controlled trial.
Anaphylaxis is a hypersensitivity reaction systemic, generalized, severe, life-threatening that may result from exposure to a triggering factor. The prevalence of anaphylaxis is 0.05 to 2% in the general population. Most reactions appear within 30 minutes after contact with the triggering factor and last up to 6 hours. The main triggering factors are: 1/food, 2/hymenopteran bites, 3/drugs. The main treatment is the early administration of adrenaline by Intramuscular route on medical prescription or by AAI (adrenaline auto-injector) associated with the exclusion of the allergen. Adrenaline treatment should be administered as soon as possible, a failure or delay in the use of adrenaline is a risk factor for death. Anaphylaxis is a chronic disease and the patient must be informed from the first episode about the risk of recurrence and the risk of death he is exposed to. Patient education is essential for the complete removal of the triggering factor, recognition of anaphylaxis symptoms and use of AAI. The risk of recurrence is high given the difficulty to completely eliminate the favourable factor (mainly food causes and hymenopteran bites): 1/3 of deaths from food anaphylaxis occur at home, and the peak mortality rate is between 10 and 30 years old. The diagnosis of anaphylaxis can be difficult because the symptomatology can be so varied. It is under-diagnosed, which leads to a lack of medical care and therefore an under-prescription of AAI. Some American studies identifying emergency room visits for anaphylaxis find that in less than 30% of cases there is a prescription for AAI, in less than 40% of advices about triggering factor's eviction and in less than 20% a guidance to an allergology consultation. In France, the HAS published in 2013 a procedure to be followed after the treatment of a suspected anaphylaxis: the patient's management must be diagnostic, therapeutic and educational. It must be systematically based on three axes: - the prescription of AAI with an explanation of its use, - the provision of written information on the mechanism and symptoms of anaphylaxis, attitude to be followed in event of an anaphylactic reaction, and need for eviction if the allergen has been identified, - guidance to an allergology consultation. Therapeutic education for anaphylactic patients is essential given the risk involved. In an American study, it was shown that only 60% of teens and young adults suffering from food allergies report having AAI systematically with them. Information and education is therefore essential for these patients.
The aim of this study is to evaluate the concordance between the measurement of cardiac blood flow by non-invasive supra sternal ultrasound and the measurements performed by invasive monitoring in intensive care patients already equipped with an invasive monitoring. This invasive monitoring consists of catheters used to measure the cardiac output allowing the supply of organs and is installed when there is need to monitor the blood flow in different hemodynamic reasons. The patient's care will not be modified, the study just requires a supplementary measure in an exam already perform in the standard care. The principal hypothesis is that we can show a concordance between this non-invasive measure and the standard invasive monitoring.