View clinical trials related to Shock.
Filter by:Sepsis is a global healthcare burden sepsis, it reaches 20-30 million cases annually (WHO data). Numerous studies have shown that extracorporeal hemoperfusion therapies that eliminate endotoxin and\or excess of cytokines improve treatment outcomes in patients with septic shock. Aim of the study: to evaluate safety and feasibility of clinical use of an extracorporeal blood adsorber based on a hypercrosslinked styrene-divinylbenzene copolymer with immobilized lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-selective ligand designed to remove endotoxins from the bloodstream to treat patients with septic shock.
A multi-center, prospective randomized (1:1) pilot and feasibility study to evaluate the safety and feasibility of supersaturated oxygen (SSO2) therapy delivered for 60 minutes selectively into the culprit coronary artery of patients presenting with ST elevation myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock (STEMI-CS) treated using a shock protocol.
The purpose of this study is to assess the effect of norepinephrine and fluid expansion on capillary refill time during septic shock.
To demonstrate that external drainage of thoracic duct lymph during sepsis results in a reduction in circulating pro-inflammatory cytokines. To demonstrate safety and feasibility of early thoracic duct cannulation and external lymph drainage for up to 7 days in adult surgical intensive care patients. To explore other biochemical and physiological endpoints that can be used for the design of future randomized controlled trials and estimate effect size of external drainage.
This study aims to develop a predictive model for the outcomes of patients with cardiogenic shock
New-onset supraventricular arrhythmia (NOSVA) is reported in 40 % of patients with septic shock and is associated with hemodynamic alterations and mortality. The lack of consensus regarding best practices for the management of NOSVA in this setting has led to major variations in practice patterns. Observational studies reported three usual strategies: (i) heart rate control (hereafter rate control) with the use of antiarrhythmic drugs, essentially based on low dose of amiodarone, (ii) rhythm control with the use of antiarrhythmic drugs, essentially based on high dose of amiodarone, and electrical cardioversionand (iii) modifiable NOSVA risk factors control (hereafter risk control) without using antiarrhythmic drugs. Risk control would minimize adverse events of antiarrhythmic drugs. Rhythm control would rapidly improve haemodynamics via restoring diastole and decreasing cardiac metabolic demand, while minimizing exposure to anticoagulation. Rate control, would limit potential adverse events of high dose of amiodarone and of electrical cardioversion (only in patients intubated on mechanical ventilation), while controlling haemodynamics. Therefore, it seems important to compare these three strategies. Our hypothesis is dual: first, that rate control and rhythm control each improve hemodynamics with in fine a decreased mortality, as compared to a risk control; second, that rhythm control outperforms rate control in this setting. This is a multicenter, parallel-group, open-label, randomized controlled superiority trial to compare the effectiveness and safety of these three strategies (risk control, rate control and rhythm control) for NOSVA during septic shock.
To discribe concentration of NT-proBNP and Troponin I in Dengue hemorrhagic shock children, in correlation between concentration of NT-proBNP and troponin I with total fluid admission, respiratory support, using inotrope and vasopressor using.
This is a monocentre randomized pilot study. All patients received two consecutive RRT: CVVHD with MCO filter (Ultraflux® EMiC®2) and post-Continuous Veno-Venous Hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) with HFF(AV1000S®) in a controlled randomized (1:1) blinded manner. Crossover randomized to sequence (A+B or B+A) for 48 h total without washout.
Sepsis is a global healthcare burden sepsis, it reaches 20-30 million cases annually (WHO data). Numerous studies have shown that extracorporeal hemoperfusion therapies that eliminate endotoxin and\or excess of cytokines improve treatment outcomes in patients with septic shock. The main purpose of the study is to obtain new data on the efficacy and safety of the Efferon LPS device in extracorporeal therapy in patients with abdominal sepsis complicated by septic shock.
Anaphylaxis is a severe and life-threatening complication during the perioperative period. Perioperative anaphylaxis is still associated with a significant mortality despite quick and efficient management using epinephrine, the mainstay of acute treatment. Experimental data and few case reports are suggesting that hemostasis, and more precisely platelets, could play a role in anaphylaxis. Our main hypothesis is that activation of the hemostatic system contributes to the severity of the reaction