View clinical trials related to Shock.
Filter by:The aim of the study was to investigate whether CVVH, in comparison to intermittent haemodialysis (IHD), is able to improve regional perfusion in septic shock patients studied by muscle microdialysis
Consecutive patients with cirrhosis and septic shock with AKI who give written informed consent will be included in this prospective trial. At baseline NT-Pro BNP, urine N-GAL will be done for all patients. A baseline serum blood sample (10 ml) and urine sample will be stored. Septic shock will be defined by the presence of two or more diagnostic criteria for the systemic inflammatory response syndrome, proven or suspected infection with hypotension non-responsive to adequate fluid resuscitation assessed by no evidence of stroke volume variation on flow track and need of a vasopressor to achieve a target mean arterial pressure (MAP) of ≥ 65 mm Hg. A record of CVP, IVC diameter and B-lines on ultrasound lung would also be done. Patients with age less than 18 years, severe known cardiopulmonary disease (structural or valvular heart disease, coronary artery disease, COPD) pregnancy, chronic kidney disease on hemodialysis, patients already meeting emergency criteria for immediate hemodialysis at the time of randomization as specified in the late group, patients transferred from other hospitals who have already been on hemodialysis before their arrival in the intensive care unit, extremely moribund patients with an expected life expectancy of less than 24 hours, failure to give informed consent from family members.
In order to identify the responding patients with vascular filling test, this research aims to compare the performance of the increased flow in the femoral artery to the performance of the blood pressure increase. The reference measurement will increase cardiac output measured by ultrasound.
This study evaluates the usefulness of the ΔvapCO2 / Cav02 ratio to predict complications after elective cardiac surgery, comparing it with others markers such as lactate, arteriovenous CO2 difference (ΔvapCO2) and would try to developed a new predictive score for postoperative complications.
Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a temporary mechanical circulatory support device for cardiogenic shock (CS) patients. During ECMO support, renal replacement therapy (RRT) facilitate more rapid metabolic or uremic control and more effective prevention and management of fluid overload which happened in critical state. CS patients who are likely to receive ECMO support will be enrolled and randomized with a 1:1 allocation to a simultaneous RRT arm vs. standard care arm. 1. The patients in the simultaneous RRT arm will receive RRT when ECMO is commenced. 2. The patients in the standard care arm will not receive RRT when ECMO is commenced. Only when a patient demonstrates AKI and fulfills any one of the criteria of the conventional RRT indication during ECMO support or after ECMO weaning, conventional-indication RRT would be delivered. The primary outcome is all-cause 30-day mortality after ECMO is commenced
After initial hemodynamic stabilization, 36 septic shock patients with heart rate > of 90 bpm and requiring norepinephrine to maintain mean arterial pressure (MAP) more than 65 mmHg will be randomised into two groups, esmolol group and control group. Patients allocated to esmolol group will receive a continuous esmolol infusion to maintain a lowering of heart rate of 10%. Norepinephrine will be titrated to achieve a MAP more than 65 mmHg. To investigate myocardial performance, the investigators will assess Tissue Doppler imaging by echocardiography and hemodynamic measures. Data will be obtained at baseline ,after esmolol infusion once achieved the predefined heart rate threshold and 72hours after esmolol infusion.
This study evaluates PK/PD of an extended-infusion protocol of meropenem, piperacillin-tazobactam and cefepime, in the early phase of septic shock.
Septic syndromes (systemic inflammatory response associated with infection) remain a major although largely under-recognized health care problem and represent the first cause of mortality in intensive care units. While it has long been known that sepsis deeply perturbs immune homeostasis by inducing a tremendous systemic inflammatory response, novel findings indicate that sepsis indeed initiates a more complex immunologic response that varies over time, with the concomitant occurrence of both pro- and anti-inflammatory mechanisms. As a resultant, after a short pro-inflammatory phase, septic patients enter a stage of protracted immunosuppression. This is illustrated in those patients by reactivation of dormant viruses (CMV or HSV) or infections due to pathogens, including fungi, which are normally pathogenic solely in immunocompromised hosts. These alterations might be directly responsible for worsening outcome in patients who survived initial resuscitation as nearly all immune functions are deeply compromised. Both arms of immunity (innate and adaptive) are indeed markedly suppressed (including enhanced leukocyte apoptosis, lymphocyte anergy and deactivated monocyte functions). New promising therapeutic avenues are currently emerging from those recent findings such as adjunctive immunostimulation for the most immunosuppressed patients. The prerequisite for immunostimulation administration (IFNg, GM-CSF, IL-7) however relies on the investigators capacity in identifying the patients who could benefit from it, as there is no clinical sign of immune dysfunctions. The main objectives are: 1. to identify the best biomarkers for sepsis-induced immunosuppression and 2. to evaluate ex vivo whether drugs could rejuvenate immune functions.
Fluid resuscitation is the most effective treatment of shock. Isotonic crystalloid solution is the current recommended initial fluid resuscitation. However, this kind of fluid has high volume of distribution and may require large volume administration before achieve therapeutic goal of shock reversal. There are rising concern about the delay in shock reversal and adverse consequences of large amount volume of fluid therapy. Colloid fluid have been used as the alternate fluid resuscitation, aiming to limit the volume of fluid resuscitation and promote shock reversal. Whether colloid infusion can improve shock reversal rate and decrease complication associated with fluid resuscitation, had inconclusive information.
Correlation study between the data provided by two measurement systems, trans- pulmonary thermodilution and ClearSight © (non invasive), to determine the interest in routine use (cardiac output, cardiac index, stroke volume and blood pressure).