View clinical trials related to Shock.
Filter by:Septic syndromes are a major although largely under-recognized health care problem and represent the first cause of mortality in intensive care units (ICU). While it has long been known that sepsis deeply perturbs immune homeostasis by inducing a tremendous systemic inflammatory response, novel findings indicate that sepsis indeed initiates a more complex immune response that varies over time, with the concomitant occurrence of both pro- and anti-inflammatory mechanisms. As a resultant, after a short pro-inflammatory phase, septic patients enter a stage of protracted immunosuppression. This is illustrated in those patients by reactivation of dormant viruses (cytomegalovirus (CMV) or Herpes Simplex Virus (HSV)) or infections due to pathogens, including fungi, which are normally pathogenic solely in immunocompromised hosts. These alterations might be directly responsible for worsening outcome in patients who survived initial resuscitation as nearly all immune functions are deeply compromised. New promising therapeutic strategies are currently emerging from those recent findings such as adjunctive immunostimulation for the most immunosuppressed patients. The prerequisite for immunostimulation administration (Interferon gama (IFNg), Granulocyte Macrophage Colony Stimulating Factor (GM-CSF), interleukin 7 (IL-7)) however relies on clinicians' capacity to identify patients who could benefit the most from these immunoadjuvant therapies, as there is no clinical sign of immune dysfunctions. In this context, the main objectives of IMMUNOSEPSIS 4 study are: 1. to identify the best biomarkers for sepsis-induced immunosuppression 2. to evaluate ex vivo candidate treatments which could rejuvenate immune functions after septic shock
Acute circulatory failure reduces oxygen delivery below cellular requirements, potentially leading to organ failure. Intravenous fluids are generally administered with the aim of increasing cardiac output and restore organ perfusion. Nevertheless, only 50% of patients increase their cardiac output, while in the remainder not only does fluid loading provide no benefit but it also leads to volume overload (peripheral and pulmonary edema). There are two types of resuscitation fluids, colloids and crystalloids. Given their oncotic pressure, colloids should remain in the intravascular space, while crystalloids distribute into the whole extracellular compartment, potentially increasing the risk of tissue edema. Surprisingly, only few studies directly compared albumin and crystalloids in terms of their overload-related side effects. Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) is a noninvasive, radiation-free, lung imaging modality, which shows lung impedance as determined by small electrical currents. An increase in intrapulmonary gas volume increases impedance, while an increase in blood or fluid volume, lowers it. EIT has a high temporal resolution, allowing to assess ventilation and perfusion in real-time. Preliminary data suggest its value to assess the variations of intrathoracic fluid in patients with pulmonary edema. The aim of the present single-blind, randomized, controlled study is to compare the effect of a fluid challenge with albumin vs. crystalloids on EIT-derived lung impedance in a group of 56 critically ill patients with acute circulatory failure. Our hypothesis is that fluid challenge with albumin leads to a lesser decrease in lung impedance, that is a lesser extravasation of fluids into the lungs. Hemodynamic and respiratory variables, blood samples, cardiac ultrasound and EIT measurements will be recorded before the fluid challenge, and repeated at the end of fluid infusion, 20 and 60 minutes after. Factorial Analysis of variance for repeated measures will be used to assess the effects of fluid loading
Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) had been used to treat refractory hypoxemia associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). There were reported good outcome associated with ECMO for ARDS caused by influenza infection from several ECMO centers. However, the outcome of ECMO support in lower ECMO experience center had not been evaluated. This study aimed to evaluate the outcome of ECMO, comparing with conventional treatment among severe hypoxemic ARDS patients who were admitted in limited ECMO experience hospital.
Septic shock is a major health problem, with several million cases annually worldwide and a mortality approaching 45%. Tachycardia is associated with excess mortality during septic shock. This pejorative effect could be related to the increase in cardiac metabolic demand, impaired cardiac diastolic function, and/or poorer tolerance of administered exogenous catecholamines. Recent studies suggest that controlling the heart rate with the use of beta blockers has beneficial effects on the morbidity and mortality of septic shock. However, the negative effects of beta-blockers on cardiac contractility and blood pressure complicate their use during septic shock, particularly because about one-half of patients exhibit a septic-associated systolic dysfunction, which often requires the use of inotropes. Ivabradine is a selective inhibitor of If channels in the sinoatrial node. It is a pure bradycardic agent with no deleterious effect on other aspects of cardiac function (contractility, conduction and repolarization) nor on blood pressure. Ivabradine can therefore alleviate sinus tachycardia without negative inotropic effects nor hypotension. Moreover, the improvement in diastolic function (ventricular filling) with ivabradine may increase stroke volume, even in case of severe impairment of systolic function. Controlling sinus tachycardia with ivabradine during septic shock would allow reducing cardiac metabolic demand (and potentially associated ischemic events) and improving the chronotropic tolerance of exogenous catecholamines. The effectiveness of ivabradine in controlling the heart rate was demonstrated in various clinical settings such as coronary artery disease, chronic heart failure and cardiogenic shock. Encouraging preliminary data are reported in critically ill patients.
The aim of this study is to analyze in patients with undifferentiated shock, the concordance of initial treatment before and after Focus cardiac ultrasound (FoCUS) in comparison with the reference one established by an adjudication committee
This prospective randomized single center study investigates to what extent the removal of elevated cytokine levels by hemoadsorption has a positive effect on the treatment of patients in septic shock by stabilizing the circulatory situation.
Severe sepsis and septic shock remain the leading causes of child mortality worldwide. Sepsis is a complex process that ultimately leads to circulation disorders, organ perfusion abnormalities, capillary leakage, tissue hypoxia, and organ failure. The difficulty of clinical treatment is microcirculation and mitochondrial dysfunction in septic shock. Once shock enters the stage of microcirculation failure, conventional treatment is ineffective. ECMO can effectively support the circulatory system and provide good oxygen delivery, but there are many controversies in clinical treatment. 1) whether ECMO can effectively improve the clinical prognosis of children with septic shock; 2) appropriate timing for ECMO intervention; 3) which key clinical factors affect the effect of ECMO treatment. This study intends to adopt a multi-center, prospective, non-randomized controlled trial design, and the main research hypothesis is whether ECMO treatment can improve the success of discharge survival of children with septic shock.
The extent and duration of tissue hypoxia is a major determinant of outcome following major, high-risk surgery and in critical illness. Prompt restoration of tissue oxygenation through resuscitation in all likelihood improves outcomes. There are currently no bedside monitors in clinical practice that track tissue perfusion per se, instead clinicians rely on crude surrogates such as heart rate and blood pressure, urine output, serum lactate of global flow (cardiac output) monitoring. This is a first-in-man trial of a new device to measure tissue oxygenation in real time in a major, high-risk surgical and critical care cohort. The device consists of an oxygen sensing probe incorporated into a modified urinary catheter, which relies on photoluminescence technology and the quenching properties of oxygen. Once inserted, the drained bladder collapses round and envelopes the probe which continuously measures tissue oxygenation of the bladder urothelium. The investigators hope to (i) Establish that tissue oxygenation can be safely monitored using this technology, deployed in this way. (ii) Define a normal range for bladder tissue oxygenation in man as measured using this device. (iii) Compare tissue oxygenation against other markers of perfusion status in current clinical practice and assess its performance at detecting inadequate perfusion against these other modalities. (iv) assess the diagnostic and prognostic capabilities of the tissue oxygenation monitoring at detecting hypo-perfusion and predicting outcome. (v) Further assess the tissue response to an 'oxygen challenge' in identifying occult hypo-perfusion. (vi). Provide pilot work required to inform future, interventional studies where similar patients would be resuscitated to tissue oxygenation targets alongside routine clinical practice.
The development of acute kidney injury (AKI) during septic shock is frequent and is associated with a high mortality rate. The reason of this increased mortality despite the use of renal replacement therapy is still unknown. The deleterious effects of uremic toxins (solutes accumulating with the loss of kidney function) has risen for the last decade in chronic kidney disease patients. Among those solutes, indoxyl sulfate (IS) is associated with the development of cardiovascular complications and impairment of immune response. The role of uremic toxins and particularly IS in the prognostic of septic kidney injury is unknown. The investigators propose to analyze the relation between the serum concentration of IS and the mortality of patients hospitalized for a septic shock who developed an AKI.
Prospective, multicenter, randomized, open-label study of standard of care plus the PMX cartridge versus standard of care alone in patients with endotoxemic septic shock