View clinical trials related to Shock.
Filter by:Sepsis is defined by the occurrence of critical organ dysfunction in the context of infection. Unfortunately, its incidence appears to be rising, and the mortality of septic shock remains extraordinary high (> 60%). Death in sepsis arises from shock and multi organ dysfunction that are - at least in part - triggered by an inadequate response of the host's immune system to the infection. Given the injurious role of 1) this overwhelming immune response and 2) the consumption of protective plasmatic factors (e.g. vWF cleaving proteases, hemostatic factors etc.) while the disease is progressing the investigators hypothesize that early therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) in the most severely ill individuals might improve hemodynamics, oxygenation and ultimately survival. This therapeutic strategy combines 2 major aspects in 1 procedure: 1. removal of harmful circulating molecules and 2. replacement of protective plasma proteins. The investigators designed the EXCHANGE trial to analyze in a randomized fashion the benefit of TPE as an add-on treatment to state of the art standard sepsis care. Only patients with early septic shock (< 24 hrs) and high catecholamine doses (norepinephrine > 0.4 ug/kg body weight/min) will be included. Those in the treatment group will receive 1 TPE within 2 hours following randomization. The primary outcome is norepinephrine dose 6 hrs after randomization. The recruitment period is 2 years and will be performed at the Hannover medical School University hospital in Germany. Secondary endpoints (including organ dysfunction as well as biochemical markers of inflammation and coagulation) will be assessed on day 1-8 and day 28 after TPE. The investigators hope to demonstrate a potential benefit of an additive treatment approach to improve the outcome of patients suffering from septic shock.
Prospective combined clinical validation of an algorithmic calculated mean systemic filling pressure (Pms-Nav) with the gold standard for Pms (Pms calculated from venous return curves during inspiratory hold procedures with incremental airway pressures; Pms-Insp). Secondary correlation between invasive cardiac output measurement versus 3D TOE and carotid echo doppler measured cardiac output.
Amikacin dose optimization is challenging in critically ill patients. The use of BestDose software algorithm-based drug optimization could help to achieve the recommended target concentrations (60-80 mg/L) after administration of the second dose of amikacin, associated with improved outcome. The study investigators hypothesize that 80% of patients undergoing drug dosing optimization using the BestDose software in the interventional group will reach the predefined PK/PD targets.
Maintaining organ perfusion is the key to successful intensive care medicine. Shock is the most dangerous microcirculatory disorder and one of the most hazardous and lethal conditions of critically ill patients still showing high mortality rates. However, there are still ongoing controversies, how to assess microcirculation, how to predict outcome in time and how to guide specific therapy. Macrocirculation does not reflect microcirculation. Microcirculation reflects organ perfusion and correlates with the outcome. There is growing evidence that microcirculatory parameters are powerful tools to predict the outcome after cardiac arrest. Several guidelines use it as a target to guide therapy, but these recommendations base only on supporting evidence of low quality. Lactate is a late reflector of reduced organ perfusion and is of limited value for time-critical decision-making and their value as a therapeutic target. Sublingual sidestream dark-field (SDF) - measurement is a non-invasive method that reliably reflects organ perfusion. The last generation of microcirculation assessment tools are easy to use hand-held devices that use an automatic algorithm. In consequence, microcirculation has become a directly detectable physiological compartment. However, systematic investigations about this technology in shock are still lacking. DAMIS determines the value of directly assessed microcirculation on outcome in different types of shock. Therefore, this multicenter study will recruit up to 200 patients in shock. After the first measurement, patients will be randomized either to intervention or to control. The intervention consists in knowing microcirculatory parameters. A checklist will assist the treating physicians of the interventional group in explaining microcirculatory values and offering possible treatment options. Patients in the control group will be measured as well, but results will not be communicated to the treating physician.
At present, there is conflicting evidence regarding outcomes in patients with septic shock receiving weight-based vasopressor (WBVP) versus non-weight-based vasopressor (NWBVP) dosing strategies. At MCMC, a weight-based strategy is in place whereas MDMC, MMMC and MRMC currently utilize a non-weight-based dosing strategy. Obese patients (BMI > 30) receiving either strategy may potentially be receiving substantially more or less vasopressor exposure compared to their non-obese (BMI < 30) counterparts. Determining total vasopressor exposure and assessing clinical outcomes would benefit our institution and others by providing optimal vasopressor dosing strategies in obese and non-obese patients. There is a difference in clinical outcomes between patients receiving weight-based and non-weight-based vasopressor dosing strategies. There is a difference in total vasopressor exposure between obese and non-obese patients utilizing WBVP and NWBVP strategies.
The purpose of this trial is to investigate the efficacy and safety of continuous intravenous administration of low dose iloprost versus placebo for 72-hours, in up to a total of 380 patients with septic shock suffering from organ failure. The study hypothesis is that iloprost may be beneficial as an endothelial rescue treatment as it is anticipated to deactivate the endothelium and restore vascular integrity in septic shock patients suffering from organ failure caused by endothelial breakdown, ultimately improving survival.
Due to the high incidence, mortality and short and long term complications of sepsis and septic shock, it is necessary to look for strategies to try to minimize this impact.
This prospective observational study will include critically ill patients with hemodynamic compromise. It will compare passive leg raising and a mini volume challenge (MVC) carried out on every patient sequentially. The endogenous release of stress hormones will also be assayed in order to investigate their modifying effect on the hemodynamic reaction of the participants. The effect of fluid resuscitation on renal perfusion will also be assessed and the data compared with the release of cystatin C.
Blood platelets play a major role in the inflammatory response. A dysregulation of platelets activation may be one of the contributors to tissue damage in critically ill patients with septic shock. The main objective of this study is to compare platelet activation markers levels (including plasma concentration in CD154, beta thromboglobulin, platelet factor 4, platelet microparticles, soluble CD62, RANTES, GRO-alpha and HMGB-1) at the early phase of a septic shock and a systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS).
This is a prospective, multi-centric, randomized, double-blind, parallel, controlled phase-II efficacy clinical study of PMZ-2010 therapy in patients with hypovolemic shock. Centhaquine is highly safe and well tolerated. Toxicological studies showed high safety margin in preclinical studies. Its safety and tolerability has been demonstrated in a human phase I study in 25 subjects (CTRI/2014/06/004647; NCT02408731).