Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Completed
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT05578534 |
Other study ID # |
MD-194-2019 |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Completed |
Phase |
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
December 1, 2020 |
Est. completion date |
October 1, 2022 |
Study information
Verified date |
October 2022 |
Source |
Cairo University |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Observational [Patient Registry]
|
Clinical Trial Summary
Background The arteriovenous difference of partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PCO2) between
mixed or central venous blood and arterial blood is the ∆PCO2 or CO2 gap. Previous data
demonstrated a strong relationship between ∆PCO2 and cardiac index (CI) at the very early
phase of resuscitation in septic shock. Monitoring the ∆PCO2 from the beginning of the
resuscitation may be a useful tool to assess the adequacy of cardiac output (CO) in tissue
perfusion.
Aim of work: To examine behavior of ∆PCO2 during early management of septic shock.
Methodology: Seventy-six patients with diagnosis of septic shock admitted to critical care
department, Cairo university hospitals. We classified the study population according to
initial resuscitation response, initial CO2 gap, or 28-days mortality. The response vs
non-response to initial resuscitation, ICU morbidity and recovery rate were the study primary
outcomes while secondary outcomes included ICU length of stay (LOS) and 28-day ICU Mortality.
Description:
Introduction
Shock is defined as a life-threatening, generalized acute circulatory failure with inadequate
cellular oxygen utilization [1]. One of the goals of acute circulatory failure treatment is
to increase cardiac output [2].
The ∆PCO2 is defined by the difference in the partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PCO2)
between mixed or central venous blood and arterial blood [1]. The ∆PCO2 has been correlated
to outcome and mortality [3].
The mixed ∆PCO2 difference has been shown to be inversely correlated with the cardiac index
(CI). A central venous PCO2, which is easier to obtain, may provide similar information.
Substitution of a central for a mixed ∆PCO2 provides an accepted alternative [4].
Measurements of central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO2) and ∆PCO2 were advised to assess
adequacy of cardiac output as well as to guide therapy [5]. A normal CO2 gap indicates that
CO is high enough to wash out CO2 from peripheral tissue. Either PCO2 gap or the PCO2 gap to
arterio-venous O2 content difference ratio could be used to guide resuscitation therapy [6].
∆PCO2 value of >6 mmHg suggests an insufficient blood flow in the tissues even when the ScvO2
is >70 % [1].
Aim of work
Our aim of the study is to investigate the value of PCO2 gap changes in the early septic
shock management compared to the cardiac output.
Patients and methods
The study was approved by the ethical committee of faculty of medicine, Cairo University
(N-194-2019)
A written informed consent was obtained from patient's first degree relatives.
Sample size calculation Based on past review of literature and by using G power software
(version 3.1.3, Heinrich-Heine-Universität, Düsseldorf Germany) with a power of 0.90 and 0.05
alpha error, sample size was calculated to be 69 patients. With a withdrawal/non-evaluable
subject rate of 10%, a total of 76 patients will be recruited.
Type of the study An observational prospective study was conducted on 76 consecutive adult
patients admitted to critical care department of Cairo university hospitals with septic shock
and elevated blood lactate level > 2 mmol/ L requiring fluid resuscitation and/ or
vasopressor drugs infusion.
Duration : between December 2020 to March 2022
Definitions
Sepsis is identified by suspected or confirmed infection AND an organ dysfunction as defined
by a sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) [7].
Organ dysfunction defined by an increase in SOFA score of 2 points or more (sepsis-related)
from up to 48 hours before to up to 24 hours after the onset of suspected infection [8].
Septic shock is clinically identified by a vasopressor requirement to maintain a mean
arterial pressure of 65 mm Hg or greater and serum lactate level greater than 2 mmol/L (>18
mg/dL) in the absence of hypovolemia [7].
Inclusion criteria The study population were included immediately on admission to ICU after
fulfilling inclusion criteria.
Exclusion criteria Patients with advanced cardiac, pulmonary, hepatic, or renal diseases were
excluded from enrolment.
Our patients were resuscitated according to surviving sepsis campaign recommendations within
1 hr of recognition. The study cohort were included immediately on admission to ICU and after
insertion of invasive lines (T0).
The resuscitation targets were MAP ≥ 65 mmHg, urine output ≥ 0.5 ml/kg/min, ScvO2 ≥ 70%,
normalization or significant decrease of serum lactate concentration.
Infusion of vasopressors during or after fluid resuscitation if MAP cannot be maintained, and
infusion of dobutamine if evidence of myocardial dysfunction or ongoing hypoperfusion despite
optimizing intravascular volume.
The 1st set of measurements were taken after insertion of invasive lines (T0) & 2nd set of
measurements were taken (T1) after completion the initial resuscitation when stable MAP by a
fluid boluses of up to 30 ml/kg iv and/or by vasopressor infusion or after 3 hours which is
closer.
Patients' demographics, comorbidities, APACHE II score up on ICU admission, SOFA score
(initial and after 48 hrs), arterial lactate, ∆PCO2, blood gases (ABG, cvVBG), vital signs,
echocardiographic LVOT cardiac output and index data were collected.
The microbiological data, source of sepsis, relevant laboratory data, vasopressor/inotropic
support, ventilatory support, continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) needs along with
ICU-morbidities and readmissions were recorded.
Lactate clearance was calculated as a percentage ratio of (initial arterial lactate level at
T0 - arterial lactate level at 6 hours after treatment)/ arterial lactate level at T0. The
P/F ratio, ∆PCO2 (before and after resuscitation), PCO2 Gap at T1/PCO2 Gap at T0 (gap/gap
ratio) and cardiac index responsiveness was calculated as well.
The patients were classified according to initial ∆PCO2, resuscitation response, and 28-days
mortality into:
1. High gap (Pcv-aCO2 > 6 mmHg) vs normal gap (Pcv-aCO2 ≤6 mmHg) [9] [10],
2. Responsive (15% increase in CI or stable MAP was achieved) vs non-responsive (< 15%
increase in CI or a stable MAP was not achieved) [11] [12]
3. Survivors vs non-survivors
The gap/gap ratio is an expression of the trend of ∆PCO2 level during resuscitation and thus,
it can be reflection of prognosis and outcome.
Response to resuscitation:
investigators defined the positive response to initial resuscitation as an increase in CI by
15% or a stable MAP was achieved within or after completion of the 1st 3 hrs post-enrolment.
This cut-off value was chosen by the reference to previous studies.