Septic Shock Clinical Trial
Official title:
Ketamine-based Versus Opioid-based for Rapid-sequence Induction of Anesthesia in Patients With Septic Shock
The aim of this work is to compare two protocols (ketamine-midazolam versus fentanyl-midazolam) for induction of anesthesia in patients with septic shock aiming to find the most safe protocol with regards to hemodynamic status of patients
Induction of anesthesia in hemodynamically compromised patients is a challenge for every
anesthetist. Most of the intravenous induction agents have a negative effect on arterial
blood pressure and cardiac output. Theoretically, the "ideal" emergency induction intravenous
anesthetic should achieve rapid hypnosis and maintain the hemodynamic stability.
Ketamine has been reported as an induction anesthetic with a sympathomimetic activity. In
patients with intact autonomic nervous system ketamine increases heart rate, cardiac output,
and arterial blood pressure (ABP). Despite its sympathomimetic activity in hemodynamically
stable patients, the hemodynamic response to ketamine in unstable cardiovascular conditions
is not clear. No studies to the best of our knowledge compared Ketamine-based and
opioid-based protocols in rapid sequence induction of anesthesia in hemodynamically unstable
patients.
In this study, patients with severe sepsis or septic shock scheduled for surgery will be
assigned to receive either ketamine or fentanyl for induction of anesthesia. After induction
of anesthesia, endotracheal tube will be inserted aided by succinyl choline. Invasive blood
pressure will be monitored through a transducer connected to arterial catheter. Electrical
velocimetry (cardiometry) device will be used for non-invasive monitoring of cardiac output
and stroke volume.
;
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT03649633 -
Vitamin C, Steroids, and Thiamine, and Cerebral Autoregulation and Functional Outcome in Septic Shock
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Terminated |
NCT04117568 -
The Role of Emergency Neutrophils and Glycans in Postoperative and Septic Patients
|
||
Completed |
NCT04227652 -
Control of Fever in Septic Patients
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05629780 -
Temporal Changes of Lactate in CLASSIC Patients
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04796636 -
High-dose Intravenous Vitamin C in Patients With Septic Shock
|
Phase 1 | |
Terminated |
NCT03335124 -
The Effect of Vitamin C, Thiamine and Hydrocortisone on Clinical Course and Outcome in Patients With Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock
|
Phase 4 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04005001 -
Machine Learning Sepsis Alert Notification Using Clinical Data
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05217836 -
Iron Metabolism Disorders in Patients With Sepsis or Septic Shock.
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05066256 -
LV Diastolic Function vs IVC Diameter Variation as Predictor of Fluid Responsiveness in Shock
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05443854 -
Impact of Aminoglycosides-based Antibiotics Combination and Protective Isolation on Outcomes in Critically-ill Neutropenic Patients With Sepsis: (Combination-Lock01)
|
Phase 3 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT04516395 -
Optimizing Antibiotic Dosing Regimens for the Treatment of Infection Caused by Carbapenem Resistant Enterobacteriaceae
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT02899143 -
Short-course Antimicrobial Therapy in Sepsis
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT02580240 -
Administration of Hydrocortisone for the Treatment of Septic Shock
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT02565251 -
Volemic Resuscitation in Sepsis and Septic Shock
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT02676427 -
Fluid Responsiveness in Septic Shock Evaluated by Caval Ultrasound Doppler Examination
|
||
Completed |
NCT02638545 -
Hemodynamic Effects of Dexmedetomidine in Septic Shock
|
Phase 3 | |
Terminated |
NCT02335723 -
ASSET - a Double-Blind, Randomized Placebo-Controlled Clinical Investigation With Alteco® LPS Adsorber
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT02547467 -
TOADS Study: TO Assess Death From Septic Shock.
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02306928 -
PK Analysis of Piperacillin in Septic Shock Patients
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02079402 -
Conservative vs. Liberal Approach to Fluid Therapy of Septic Shock in Intensive Care
|
Phase 4 |