View clinical trials related to Septate Uterus.
Filter by:The goal of this clinical trial is to compare in participant population ( women with uterine septum meeting the inclusion criteria) hysteroscopic septoplasty by resectoscope compared to hysteroscopic septoplasty with scissors. The main questions to answer are: Is there a difference in operative time ? Is there a difference in fluid used and fluid deficit? Is there a difference in complications? Is there a difference in reproductive outcome? Researchers will compare the 2 different techniques to see if there is any difference in operative outcome ( operative time, fluid used and deficit, need for second intervention, and operative and postoperative complications) and reproductive outcome.
Nowadays, there is little data to validate the performance of surgical hysteroscopies in the case of septate uterus, particularly in the case of incidental discoveries. Clinical practice and the experience of teams leads to propose this procedure, but strong evidence for this recommendation is lacking and there is an urgent need for solid data. A recent randomized trial contradicts this recommendation, but the methodology is questionable on several points. Investigators wished to associate 2 reference centers with current practice and expertise on this procedure in order to have a cohort of many patients and to have more powerful results.) Investigators purpose a retrospective observational data-based study. The aim is to describe the profile of patients with a partitioned uterus in terms of obstetrical history and to study the consequences of uterine partition resection in terms of obstetrical prognosis (live births, at term, number of miscarriages or premature births). The aim of this study is to take into account the evaluation of the surgical hysteroscopy gesture by postoperative imaging with in particular the indication of a resection in several stages in case of residual postoperative septum.