View clinical trials related to Sepsis.
Filter by:Objectives: 1. To compare the immune response of patients with or without sepsis presenting to the ED with a(n) (suspected) infection. 2. To determine immune response aberrations that are associated with an increased risk of developing sepsis in patients presenting to the ED with a(n) (suspected) infection without sepsis. 3. To determine the long term cognitive and physical sequelae of sepsis after admission.
This study is a 2-arm, multicenter, multinational, prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial. Hospitalized subjects with blood cultures growing Gram negative bacilli (GNB) will be randomized 1:1 to have the positive blood cultures characterized using standard of care (SOC) antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) vs. a rapid AST method known as Revealâ„¢ in addition to SOC AST. The purpose of the FAST trial is to evaluate whether use of a rapid phenotypic AST improves clinical outcomes compared to use of SOC AST methods in clinical settings with high resistance rates.
Sepsis, characterized by organ dysfunction caused by infection, exhibits increasing incidence and mortality rates, posing a significant challenge to intensive care units. Early-stage sepsis involves hemodynamic disturbances, and severe and complex microcirculatory impairments can result in tissue hypoxia and accelerate organ dysfunction. Modern medical research has indicated that the effective and rapid restoration of microcirculatory function, along with the correction of microcirculatory disorders, is a crucial aspect in the treatment of sepsis. Current guidelines recommend the use of vasoactive drugs to address hemodynamic disturbances, but their administration may further damage the microcirculation. Additionally, in patients with severe sepsis, there often exists a disparity between macrocirculatory and microcirculatory hemodynamics, and conventional clinical indicators fail to directly reflect the level of microcirculatory perfusion. Chinese guidelines have incorporated the use of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) in the diagnosis and treatment of sepsis, offering a new therapeutic approach to ameliorate microcirculatory impairments. This study aims to include patients with sepsis and administer Shenfu Injection via intravenous therapy. Tongue microcirculation assessment will be employed to evaluate changes in microvascular health scores, while transcutaneous oxygen and carbon dioxide pressure alterations, as well as serum lactate level variations, will be monitored to ascertain the effects of Shenfu Injection on improving early-stage microcirculatory impairments and microvascular leakage in sepsis patients. This research will clarify the clinical efficacy of Shenfu Injection in sepsis patients with microcirculatory impairments, provide evidence-based medicine and clinical evidence for TCM treatment of sepsis, and offer a solid foundation for refining sepsis treatment strategies with distinct Chinese characteristics.
Sepsis is an extremely common systemic condition in the Emergency Room (ER), which is found to be to be one of the leading causes of death among patients accessing the ER. To date, the diagnosis of sepsis does not rely on any specific markers for infectious conditions, but several methods of assessing the general condition of the patient, namely markers that elevate in a variety of inflammatory conditions (PCR, PCT), indices of tissue hypoxia (serum lactate), and scores based on the haemochromocytometric examination, the markers of function of different organs, and vital parameters expressed by the patient at the time of assessment (SOFA, qSOFA, SIRS, NEWS). These markers, in addition to not be specific for sepsis, have an insufficiently early peak of presentation to readily identify all patients presenting with this condition. Presepsin, as the N-terminal portion of the soluble component of Cluster of Differentiation 14 (CD14), is elevated almost exclusively in infectious conditions; moreover, its elevation in infectious contexts is extremely early compared with that of markers already in use, allowing early identification of septic patients who to date would be recognized as such only hours after the onset of the septic process. In addition, the determination of this biomarker could make it possible to stratify patients by prognosis, allowing greater attention to be paid to the most severe patients. It is hypothesized that the Presepsin assay in emergency room will allow to increase the rapidity and specificity of sepsis diagnosis compared with the diagnostic procedure currently used, improving the outcomes of patients accessing the emergency room with symptoms suggestive of sepsis. The main purpose of the present study is to evaluate the role of serum assay of presepsin in the early diagnosis of sepsis in patients presenting to the emergency department with clinical suspicion of sepsis by comparing the values obtained with traditionally used such as PCR, PCT, and blood culture. The secondary objective is to evaluate presepsin as a prognostic biomarker and useful for mortality risk stratification of the same patients, comparing the values obtained with validated predictor scores of mortality and/or severity (APACHEII, SOFA, qSOFA).
This study aims to observe the effectiveness of clinical application in guiding anti-infection treatments in AIDS patients with severe pneumonia and/or sepsis using Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing-based technology in the real world
Subjects previously enrolled / randomized in the ReActIF-ICE (Recovery from acute immune failure in septic shock by immune cell extracorporeal terapy - immune competence enhancement) study received either standard sepsis treatment (control group) or standard sepsis treatment and additionally the ARTICE treatment (treatment group) during their index hospitalization. All subjects are followed up for 90 days after enrollment. In this long term follow up study, the enrolled subjects shall be followed up beyond 90 days for up to 5 years.
Current study evaluates the relationship between cell immunity, biochemical and genetic markers in patients with sepsis in order to develop algorithm for predicting the course and outcome of severe bacterial infections.
Norepinephrine is a catecholamine that is the first-line vasopressor for septic shock. The addition of non-catecholamine vasopressors, including vasopressin and angiotensin-II may be used in adults with septic shock that have inadequate mean arterial pressure while on norepinephrine. Uncertainty exists regarding the timing of initiation of these agents and there is a lack of data comparing their safety and efficacy. The current literature suggests that earlier initiation of angiotensin-II will have a more significant reduction on norepinephrine-equivalent dose compared to later initiation. In addition, approximately half of patients initiated on vasopressin do not have an early hemodynamic response 6 hours after initiation. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of angiotensin-II when used as the second vasopressor agent for septic shock.
A diagnostic and prognostic study, in which the expression of CD64 in activated neutrophils and CD64 and IL17A regulatory T cells in patients with sepsis will be evaluated as a probable marker for sepsis as a primary objective
It is estimated that approximately 15% to 20% of the subjects with sigmoid diverticulosis will develop acute diverticulitis, with diverticular abscess as the most common complication of sigmoid diverticulitis. While cases with free perforations and diffuse peritonitis require emergency surgery, in cases with contained perforation and abscess formation, the approach is initially conservative. Due to its relative rarity, the treatment of diverticular abscess is not based on high-quality scientific evidence. Abscess size of 4-6 cm is generally accepted as reasonable cutoff determining the choice of treatment between antibiotic therapy and antibiotic therapy plus percutaneous drainage of the abscess. A subgroup of patients will fail the conservative approach and require a surgical rescue strategy. However, the real incidence for conservative treatment failure after non-operative management of acute diverticulitis with abscess remain poorly understood, the knowledge of which could improve decision-making processes, treatment strategies, patient counseling, and even modify the planned treatment strategy in patients deemed at highest risk. The early recognition of patients who show clinical signs of ongoing and worsening intra-abdominal sepsis due to perforation is important to ensure the success of this strategy. In the light of these, knowledge of risk predictors for failure is of utmost importance. Owing the contrasting evidence summary, we set up a multicenter retrospective cohort study that merges the cases from twelve high-volume centers for emergency surgery in Italy to assess the short-term outcomes of initial non-surgical treatment strategies for AD with abscess formation (Hinchey Ib and II) in a large number of patients, and identify risk factors associated with adverse outcomes, to help facilitate appropriate patient selection and assess the optimal treatment strategy for this peculiar subgroup of patients. The purpose of this study is to describe the incidence and risk factors for conservative treatment (antibiotics alone or antibiotics plus percutaneous drainage) failure after non-operative management of acute diverticulitis with abscess using a large multicenter patient series. The present study is designed as a multicenter retrospective observational study conducted at twelve secondary and tertiary Italian teaching surgical centers on CT-diagnosed hemodynamically stable patients (≥18 years) with perforated acute diverticulitis with abscess (with or without extraluminal air) initially treated non-surgically. The rate of failure of non-operative treatment for complicated acute diverticulitis patients with abscess formation and the risk factors of failure of the non-surgical treatment will be assessed. Failure of the conservative treatment is defined as lack of clinical improvement in the general conditions of the patient during index hospital admission, requiring urgent surgery to treat intra-abdominal sepsis.