View clinical trials related to Sepsis.
Filter by:Safety and Performance Evaluation of Seraph 100 Microbind Affinity Blood Filter (Seraph 100) in the reduction of pathogen load from the blood in septic patients with suspected, life-threatening bloodstream infection
An observational study on the insulin resistance in sepsis and septic shock patients.
In this study, the researcher involved the sepsis patients(defined by sepsis 3.0) in Peking Union Medical College Hospital. The SAE was defined as the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of less than 15 and the Non-SAE group GCS = 15. The control group was the non-infectious patients with acute disease strikes and the healthy control. After the sample collection, the RNA-sequence, metabolites and cytokines were under detection.
This is a prospective, observational study designed to examine the performance of biomarkers, molecular biological methods and other analysis in blood from patient with suspected sepsis in the Emergency department, as well as identidying novel sepsis endotypes. Around 1500 patients will be enrolled.
Studies have demonstrated that the use of a procalcitonin (PCT)-guided algorithm in combination with clinical judgment was associated with reduced antibiotic use without impacting mortality or treatment failure. Though several studies have evaluated the use of PCT in critically ill patients, there are limited studies that evaluated PCT in patients with cancer and many of the currently available studies have excluded immune-compromised patients. This is a randomized controlled trial that aims to evaluate the impact of a procalcitonin-guided algorithm on antibiotic utilization in critically ill cancer patients with sepsis. In addition, the study aims to evaluate the predictive value of PCT for predicting mortality and positive cultures.
This is a prospective cohort study using gene expression to study patients with infection and sepsis from pneumonia.
To assess the Influence of early lactate clearance rate monitoring in patients with sepsis.
In patients with septic shock, low levels of circulating immunoglobulins are common and they are kinetic, particularly of immunoglobulin M (IgM), seems to be related with clinical outcome. These observations, combined with the pivotal role of immunoglobulins on host immune response to infections, led to consider therapy with polyclonal intravenous immunoglobulins a promising option in patients with septic shock. IgM-enriched preparations have been used since now most of all at a standard dose recommended by the producer although a more tailored approach may improve patients' outcomes. This study hypothesizes that in patients with septic shock and low IgM immunoglobulins titers at shock onset, adjunctive treatment with a personalized dose of IgM-enriched immunoglobulins based on IgM serum titers of the patient may reduce mortality compared to a standard dose of IgM-enriched immunoglobulins. The study is designed as a multicentre, national, interventional, randomized, single-blinded, prospective, investigator-sponsored, two arms study. Patients will be randomly assigned to IgM titer-based treatment or flat treatment group in a 1:1 ratio. One group of patients will receive IgM-enriched immunoglobulins adjunctive treatment in a standard dose of 250mg/kg for 3 days. The other group will receive IgM-enriched immunoglobulins adjunctive treatment in a variable dose calculated taking note of the extent of IgM deficit, in order to achieve an IgM threshold value of 100 mg/dL or above. IgM preparation will be administered in this group up to the withdrawal of vasoactive drugs with a maximum allowed of 7 days. The confirmation of the efficacy of a tailored strategy for IgM-enriched immunoglobulin administration in reducing the mortality rate among patients with septic shock and low IgM titers will lead to a revision of the current clinical practice in the use of this adjunctive treatment.
This study is a multicenter randomized controlled trial. The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy of the combination of PCR and CRISPR/Cas12a in alveolar lavage fluid for early targeted anti-infective therapy for patients with severe pneumonia. Hosted by the Department of Critical Care Medicine, Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical College, 5 adult ICU units participate in 3 hospitals. All patients are randomly assigned to the experimental group and the control group. For experimental group, the combined detection of PCR and CRISPR/Cas12a in the alveolar lavage fluid was carried out in the early stage, and the antibiotic scheme is changed base on the results of PCR-CRISPR/Cas12a.The patients in the control group were adjusted according to the traditional microbial detection methods. The types of early antibiotics, the proportion of target antibiotics, the duration of anti-infective treatment, the length of hospital stay in ICU, the mortality rate, the secondary antibiotic-associated diarrhea, and the incidence of new multidrug-resistant infections were recorded.
Sepsis induces both a systolic and diastolic cardiac dysfunction. The prevalence of this septic cardiomyopathy ranges between 30 and 60% according to the timing of assessment and definition used. Although the prognostic role of septic cardiomyopathy remains debated, sepsis-induced left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction may be severe and associated with tissue hypoperfusion, while it appears to fully recover in survivors. Accordingly, optimization of therapeutic management of septic cardiomyopathy may contribute to improve tissue hypoperfusion in increasing oxygen delivery, and to reduce related organ dysfunctions in septic shock patients. Echocardiography is currently the recommended first-line modality to assess patients with acute circulatory failure. Current Surviving Sepsis Campaign strongly recommends Norepinephrine as the first-choice vasopressor in fluid-filled patients with septic shock. In contrast, the use of Dobutamine is only suggested (weak recommendation, low quality of evidence) in patients with persistent tissue hypoperfusion despite adequate fluid resuscitation and vasopressor support. Levosimendan, an alternative inodilator, has failed preventing acute organ dysfunction in septic patients and has induced more supraventricular tachyarrhythmias than in the control group. Data supporting Dobutamine in this setting are scarce and primarily physiologic and based on monitored effects of this drug on hemodynamics and indices of tissue perfusion. No randomized controlled trials have yet compared the effects of Dobutamine versus placebo on clinical outcomes. In open-labelled, small sample trials, the ability of septic patients to increase their oxygen delivery during Dobutamine administration appears to be associated with lower mortality. The tested hypothesis in the ADAPT trial is that Dobutamine will reduce tissue hypoperfusion and associated organ dysfunctions in patients with septic shock and associated septic cardiomyopathy. In doing so, it may participate in improving clinical outcomes.