View clinical trials related to Sepsis.
Filter by:In this prospective, single-center,randomized,controlled,single-blind clinical trial,Patients will be randomly assigned to receive granisetron or placebo for 4 days or until leaving the ICU(death or transfer from ICU to general ward or discharge). The primary outcome is all-cause death rate at 28 days.
The use of neutrophil lymphocyte ratio is useful for the detection of infection status in newborns after surgery
Sepsis is estimated to affect more than 30 million people globally. Detecting sepsis is notoriously difficult and there are no systems in place utilize prehospitally. In Denmark, the Mobile Emergency Care Unit (the MECU), manned by a physician and paramedic, is able to draw blood cultures and take venous lactate measurements before administering antibiotics. This study aims to conduct a quality control on the ability of the MECU to recognize and treat sepsis by confirming the amounts of in-hospitally diagnosed cases. Furthermore the study investigates whether the blood cultures falls within an acceptable range of contamination.
This study will be a multicenter, cluster randomized, step-wedged design. The unit of randomization will be the inpatient units admitted critically ill patients, with the interventions being carried out over 4 months. The study plans to enroll 14 units at 2 sites. Four sequences will be enrolled into the intervention each month; each sequence will have 3-4 units (see figure 1). Units eligible for the study will have patients that are critically ill admitted and have had at least 1 CLABSI events over the past 12 months (fiscal year). Given the pragmatic nature of the study design, there will be limited additional inclusion and exclusion criteria. Prior to the beginning the study, all nursing staff (RNs and nursing assistants [NAs]) will receive a survey link (RedCAP) to understand their perceptions of CHG bathing. After all units have been enrolled (approximately 4 months), nursing staff will be sent a post-survey to see if their perceptions have improved after the program. Further, the Context Assessment Index (used with permission; via RedCAP) will also be used to assess the context (i.e., culture) in which clinicians works and the effect this has on using evidence in practice. This will be provided to infection prevention champions on each unit one time, at the beginning of enrollment. All hospitals in the trial will receive access to site-level quality reports on CLABSI data. The interventions will include a "direct engagement" at the site level; this strategy will build upon current quality improvement interventions developed from the Agency for Healthcare Research & Quality for optimization of care for critically ill patients at risk for CLABSIs. The multidisciplinary teams will include national key opinion leaders in quality improvement working with local infection prevention specialists and support staff to help healthcare systems and hospitals design or revise quality improvement plans. Units will receive feedback on quality improvement efforts, including audit and feedback reviewing their CHG bathing compliance and CLABSI rates. Duke will serve as the primary statistical center and analysis will be generated by Duke. The only risk in this study is the possibility of breach of confidentiality. The primary objective of this study is to assess the effect of a customized, multifaceted quality improvement [QI] program on compliance with daily chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) bathing per the AHRQ protocol in inpatient units that admit critically ill patients. Further, we will assess the effect of this program on nursing staffs' perception of the importance of CHG bathing. The Context Assessment Index (used with permission) will also be used to assess the context (i.e., culture) in which clinicians works and the effect this has on using evidence in practice. The secondary objective of this study is to examine the effect of the QI program on central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) rates. Primary outcomes and CLABSI rates will be measured at 12 months to assess sustainability.
- To identify the common bacterial and fungal species causing fungemia and bacteremia in hematological malignancies. - To identify sensitivity pattern for causative microbes. - Compare culture on ordinary media with Vitek2 (automated microbial identification system) and multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR )
Interventional study comparing effect of two regimes of fluid challenge in patients with sepsis and in patients undergoing elective major surgery on glycocalyx by using perfused Boundary Region in sublingual microcirculation.
Although advances in neonatal care have improved survival and reduced complications in preterm infants, sepsis still contributes significantly to mortality and in Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICUs), in particular for very-low-birth-weight (VLBW, <1500 g) and extremely-low-birth-weight (ELBW, <1000g). Based on the timing of the infection neonatal sepsis has been classified into early-onset sepsis (EOS) and late-onset sepsis (LOS), with differences in the mode of transmission and predominant organisms. EOS is defined as onset in the first 3 days of life generally due to vertical transmission of bacteria from mothers to infants during the intrapartum period. LOS occurs after 3 days of life and it is attributed to pathogens acquired postnatally (horizontal transmission). Considering generally neonatal sepsis in Europe, 90% of the responsible bacteria resulted to be: Streptococcus agalactiae, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, e Listeria monocytogenes. The diagnosis is difficult because clinical signs, particularly early in the course of disease, are subtle and nonspecific, and laboratory tests and blood culture are not always reliable. Moreover. blood culture (considered the 'gold standard) takes 48-72 hours for result. In fact the cultural method requires the presence of living and vital germs, depends on the volume of the sample - serious problem in neonatal population -, several hours are needed to process the sample, possibly resulting falsely negative in subjects undergoing concomitant antibiotic treatment or a false positive result can be found by contamination. The method based on molecular biology does not require living germs and, therefore, is not characterised by the sensitivity limitations. Such method can result to be extremely effective in patients receiving antibiotic therapy. In the present study, when an infant has to undergone blood sample for bacteria culture to verify a possible sepsis, a residual blood (200µl) is processed in the same time using a kit based on molecular biology. This kit is designed to obtain the highest sensitivity and specificity in the determination of most invasive bacterial diseases (meningitis, sepsis, pneumonia, etc.) affecting full-term, preterm infants to determine any presence of bacterial DNA belonging to all serotypes of Klebsiella pneumoniae, Escherichia coli, Streptococcus agalactiae and Listeria monocytogenes. The target bacteria have been chosen on the basis of the current Italian epidemiological context, so as to include germs causing about 90% of the meningitis/sepsis cases among the neonatal population. The detection system can unmistakably identify the germ against which it is directed and without causing any cross-reaction with other germs or human DNA.. The results obtained with this method have demonstrated a 100% specificity (no false positive result) The sensitivity of this method compared with the cultural method has turned out to be twice as high. The aim of the present study is to compare the efficacy of the blood culture method and the kit for molecular detection of bacterial DNA (all serotypes of Klebsiella pneumoniae, Escherichia coli, Streptococcus agalactiae and Listeria monocytogenes) considering the relevant epidemiology of our NICU, in order to verify the relative frequency of sepsis (EOS and LOS) caused by the target bacteria on the whole frequency of the bacteria responsible of all the sepsis in our ward.
This is an observational study to evaluate the diagnostic and prognostic value of presepsin in the critically-ill immunocompromise patients.
The performance of the eLab C-Reactive Protein, Procalcitonin, and Lactate Assays will be demonstrated during a method comparison study in which venous whole blood and plasma samples are used. eLab results will be compared to an FDA cleared predicate device. Demographic information will be collected for the subject. Venous blood will be collected in 2 Li-heparinized tubes (2-4ml per tube). One tube will be used for testing at the site and the second tube will be processed to plasma for storage and subsequent shipment to a designated testing site. Whole blood samples will be tested on the eLab C-Reactive Protein, Procalcitonin, and Lactate test as soon as possible after collection; testing on whole blood must be completed within 30 minutes of collection. A predicate Lactate test will also be run as soon as possible after collection; testing of WB on the predicate must be completed within 30 minutes of collection. Plasma will be separated from the whole blood via centrifugation within 30 minutes of collection and tested on the eLab C-Reactive Protein, Procalcitonin, and Lactate Assays and started on predicate CRP and PCT devices (If available at the site) within 30 minutes of the eLab whole blood test. The remainder of the plasma specimen and plasma from the second collection tube will be frozen within one hour of collection, then stored at approximately -20 degrees C or colder.
The purpose of this study is to determine whether a new antibiotic, Cefiderocol which works against a wide variety of gram negative bacteria, is equally effective as the antibiotics that are currently used as current standard of care.