View clinical trials related to Sepsis, Severe.
Filter by:The study aims to map the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) after intensive care for Sepsis with the hypothesis that it will be lower than that in the general population. The investigators also want to identify factors that are associated with low HRQoL, to see if those are available for interventions from the health care system and society to improve quality of life after treatment for sepsis in the intensive care unit (ICU).
To assess the effect of probiotics on cytokine's level(interleukin 6 and Transforming growth factor-β1)in children admitted to PICU with sepsis.
The study aims to evaluate the suitability of the SOFA score implemented by the Sepsis 3 guideline to detect sepsis in patients suffering from subrarachnoid hemorrhage.
Background: Sarcopenia (muscle weakness) characterized by a decrease in muscle mass, strength and performance is a condition that increases with old age. Sarcopenia can be seen in 5-13% of patients hospitalized in ICU where various treatment methods are used to prevent this weakness, the rate increases in patients with sepsis/ septic shock. Muscle treatment methods are used to prevent sarcopenia in similar patients hospitalized in ICU. It is predicted that "neuromuscular electrical stimulator-NMES" treatment may increase muscle mass and strength in patients who's can not be exercised actively. In this study, the contribution of NMES treatment to prevent the development of muscle weakness in patients with a diagnosis of sepsis/ septic shock followed in intensive care units (ICU) was evaluated.
In this clinical trial the effect of early administration of Vitamin C is investigated in patients admitted at the emergency department with sepsis or septic shock. When a patient has sepsis, his/her body is causing damage to its own tissues and organs as result of an infection. This can lead to septic shock. The patient has a low blood pressure, his/her organs stop working and the patient may even die. The aim of this trial is to investigate the efficiency of Vitamin C in sepsis and septic shock. Vitamin C is a vitamin present in various foods and has been approved as dietary supplement by the Belgian authorities. Over the years it has been proven that Vitamin C is very safe. In addition, several studies have shown that Vitamin C can also have a protective effect. It can reduce organ damage and increase survival rates. Although several studies suggest that Vitamin C can help fight sepsis, it is not yet used in practice. This Belgian trial, in which several hospitals participate, hopes to provide a clear answer to the question: "Should Vitamin C be administered to patients admitted in an emergency department with sepsis or septic shock?"
Objective: To compare two de-escalation strategies guided by either extravascular lung water or global end-diastolic volume-oriented algorithms in patients with sepsis and ARDS. Design: A prospective randomized study. Setting: City Hospital #1 of Arkhangelsk, Russia, mixed ICU. Patients: Sixty patients with sepsis and ARDS were randomized to receive de-escalation fluid therapy, guided either by extravascular lung water index (EVLWI, n = 30) or global end-diastolic volume index (GEDVI, n = 30). Intervention: In case of GEDVI > 650 mL/m2 or EVLWI > 10 mL/kg, diuretics and/or controlled ultrafiltration were administered. The primary goal of de-escalation was to achieve the cumulative 48-hr fluid balance in the range of 0 to - 3000 mL. If GEDVI < 650 mL/m2 or EVLWI < 10 mL/kg, the target fluid balance was set from 0 to +3000 mL.
The sepsis and septic shock remain major causes of child morbidity and mortality, despite the use of modern antibiotics and resuscitation therapies. Recent interest has focused on biomarkers for early diagnosis, and evaluation the outcomes of sepsis; but there is a still lack of early diagnosis and timely intervention for sepsis in the emergency department (ED). The primary aim was to investigate the role of C-Reactive Protein(CRP), Procalcitonin(PCT), soluble-urokinase plasminogen activator receptor(suPAR) and Presepsin in the early stratification of patients with sepsis. The usefulness of pediatric Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (pSOFA) for predicting of the mortality and the rate of PICU admission in children with septik shock were also investigated. This prospective pilot study was conducted at academic pediatric ED between September 2017-June 2018. All children who met sepsis criteria admitted to ED were involved to study. They kept following up after ED management and their blood samples were taken upon admission on day 0, 1, 2, 4 and 7. The definition made as sepsis, severe sepsis and septic shock. At the same period, 100 healthy children chosen as the control group. The patient characteristics, clinical features, diagnosis, co-morbidities, source of infection, laboratory results (CRP, PCT, lactate, suPAR and Presepsin) and treatments were recorded. The pSOFA score was calculated during first hour of admission. Length of stay in ED and hospital was noted. The main outcome measure was in 7 and 30-day mortality.
In recent years, many studies have pointed out that bacterial toxin and cytokine storm are the main causes of shock and multiple organ failure in patients with sepsis. Endotoxin is the main vehicle for systemic inflammatory reaction caused by gram-negative bacteria which induce sepsis. Endotoxin binds to Toll- Like receptor 4 (TLR4) trigger a cytokine storm. The amount of endotoxin is associated with shock, insufficient intestinal perfusion, and poor prognosis. Therefore, clinicians try to use various methods to antagonize the action of endotoxin, which can reduce the cytokine storm and inflammatory response to improve the prognosis of sepsis. Continuous venous venous hemofiltration plays a role in blood purification in septic shock. With different hemofiltration filters, it has different effects. By removing the inflammatory mediators caused by bacterial toxins and cytokines, shock can be improved. The study plans to receive patients with septic shock and use a hemofiltration filter that adsorbs endotoxin and removes cytokines (oXiris, Baxter Healthcare) to perform continuous venous venous hemofiltration in addition to basic septic shock resuscitation. The effect on the concentration of cytokines in the blood, the infusion dose of inotropics, the fluid balances, and the degree of organ damage was evaluated. It is hoped that the results of this pilot study can lead us to subsequent randomized clinical trials to explore whether this filter can improve the prognosis of septic shock patients.
Septic pathology is an extremely frequent reason for consultation in our emergency services, with an annual incidence of severe forms between 50 to 95 cases per 100,000 inhabitants and a constant increase estimated at 9% per year. Diagnosing these patients early and precisely is a major challenge for the clinician, as this diagnosis will lead to more or less aggressive medical management. The criteria of S.I.R.S, used to define and to sort patients in sepsis according to the old definition, were completely abandoned in the last recommendations for lack of specificity but also of sensitivity. The latest recommendations suggest using another score, the "Quick Sepsis Related Organ Failure Assesment (qSOFA) score", in order to early detect septic patients at risk of poor progress. However, the recent literature highlights a very low sensitivity of the qSOFA score for the screening of septic patients, ranging from 30 to 60% according to the studies. In addition to qSOFA, other scores are described in the literature with apparently higher sensitivity, and thus seem more suitable for our daily practice. Among them is the NEWS score or the RETTS score. Each of these scores is again based upon the values of vital signs recorded as soon as the patient arrives in the emergency department. To date, very few studies have been interested, in a prospective way, in the sensitivity and the specificity of these different scores to diagnose the "infected" patients in the emergency departments. Therefore a non-interventional, prospective, multicenter cohort study is carried out here, in order to be able to compare, on the same cohort of patients admitted into emergency services, the diagnostic performance of these different scores with respect to the presence or absence of an infection. The aim of this study is to define the best clinical score to use in emergency medicine to quickly diagnose the infected patients, and offer them the best medical care.
This study has been created to compare the addition of intravenous (IV) vitamin C, thiamine, and hydrocortisone to the usual standard of care of sepsis and septic shock. Sepsis is a possibly life-threatening condition in which a patient may have organ dysfunction due to an infection. Septic shock is defined as low blood pressure and organ dysfunction that do not improve after administering IV fluids. Standard of care for sepsis and septic shock include early administration of IV antibiotics, IV fluids, and vasopressors if need be to provide oxygen to vital organs. A large amount of experimental data has shown that vitamin C and corticosteroids decrease the release of inflammatory substances which may lead to organ failure seen in sepsis. Vitamin C and corticosteroids also improve blood flow to vital organs and increase the body's ability to respond well to vasopressor medications used in septic shock. Low blood levels of both thiamine and vitamin C are common in sepsis. The study will be placebo controlled, meaning one group will receive vitamin C, thiamine, and hydrocortisone, and the other will receive an inactive substance ("placebo"). The goal of the study is to compare the effects of receiving vitamin C, thiamine, and hydrocortisone (along with the standard sepsis care) versus placebo and standard sepsis care.