Sensitivity, Tooth Clinical Trial
Official title:
Clinical Evaluation of OBU When Used for Indirect Dental Restorations
Verified date | February 2024 |
Source | Kerr Corporation |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
The objective of this study is to evaluate the clinical safety and performance of Optibond Universal (OBU), a single component universal dental adhesive intended for indirect dental restorations according to manufacturer's Instruction For Use.
Status | Terminated |
Enrollment | 13 |
Est. completion date | February 8, 2024 |
Est. primary completion date | February 8, 2024 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years to 100 Years |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Is willing to provide voluntary written informed consent in English. - Is in good medical health and able to tolerate the dental procedures. - Has 1 qualifying either vital or endodontically treated molar and/or premolar that requires an endodontic post and or core build-ups with subsequent indirect restoration or an indirect restoration only. Only 1 tooth per quadrant can be included in the study if more than 1 tooth in need of restoration. The maximum number of restorations will not exceed two per patient. - The tooth must be restorable, i.e. without subgingival caries and must have a minimum of 2-3 mm healthy supragingival tooth structure. - Study teeth must have an antagonist in the opposite jaw and have a neighboring tooth on at least one side. - Study teeth must be vital and without any symptoms suggesting irreversible damage of the pulp, or endodontically treated and hermetically filled according to standards of care (i.e., free of clinical signs and symptoms of periapical pathology). Exclusion Criteria: - Is currently taking part in an evaluation of other dental procedures. - Has chronic periodontitis or rampant caries. - The study tooth exhibits clinical signs of periapical pathology. - The study tooth has a history of self-reported preoperative pulpal problems. - The study tooth that has been restored using eugenol containing materials. - Study Subjects with severe parafunctional habits or occlusal issues affecting the subject teeth. - Women who are pregnant (self-reported). It is standard of care to postpone routine dental procedures and radiographed until after pregnancy. - Women who are breast feeding. - Known allergy to methacrylates or other components of resin composites, local anesthetics, or metals used for dental restorations. - An employee of the sponsor or members of their immediate family. - Condition affecting salivary flow (e.g., salivary gland disorder, Sjögren's Syndrome, xerogenic medications). - Are unwilling or unable to have dental radiographs or photographs taken of their dentition and soft tissues. - Unable to return to the recall visits. - Any other condition which is the view of the investigator may affect the ability of a patient to complete the study. - Teeth with implant restorations. - Third molars. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United States | Nova Southeastern University, College of dental Medicine | Fort Lauderdale | Florida |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Kerr Corporation |
United States,
Alharbi A, Rocca GT, Dietschi D, Krejci I. Semidirect composite onlay with cavity sealing: a review of clinical procedures. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2014 Mar-Apr;26(2):97-106. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12067. Epub 2013 Dec 17. — View Citation
Hickel R, Peschke A, Tyas M, Mjor I, Bayne S, Peters M, Hiller KA, Randall R, Vanherle G, Heintze SD. FDI World Dental Federation: clinical criteria for the evaluation of direct and indirect restorations-update and clinical examples. Clin Oral Investig. 2010 Aug;14(4):349-66. doi: 10.1007/s00784-010-0432-8. Epub 2010 Jul 14. — View Citation
Hill EE. Dental cements for definitive luting: a review and practical clinical considerations. Dent Clin North Am. 2007 Jul;51(3):643-58, vi. doi: 10.1016/j.cden.2007.04.002. — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Sensitivity Questionnaire-Visual Analog Scale 0 to 10 (0=No pain, 10=Worst pain possible) | Preoperative sensitivity | Screening | |
Primary | Sensitivity Questionnaire-Visual Analog Scale 0 to 10 (0=No pain, 10=Worst pain possible) | Preoperative sensitivity | Preparation, Provisional Restoration (up to 6 weeks from Screening) | |
Primary | Sensitivity Questionnaire-Visual Analog Scale 0 to 10 (0=No pain, 10=Worst pain possible) | Postoperative sensitivity | 48 hours after Cementation (up to 4 weeks from Preparation) | |
Primary | Sensitivity Questionnaire-Visual Analog Scale 1 to 5 (1=No pain, 5=Worst pain possible) | Postoperative sensitivity | Baseline Followup Assessments (approximately 3 weeks from Cementation) | |
Primary | Sensitivity Questionnaire-Visual Analog Scale 1 to 5 (1=No pain, 5=Worst pain possible) | Postoperative sensitivity | 6-months Followup Assessments (approximately 6 months from Baseline) | |
Primary | Sensitivity Questionnaire-Visual Analog Scale 1 to 5 (1=No pain, 5=Worst pain possible) | Postoperative sensitivity | 1-year Followup Assessments (approximately 1 year from Baseline) | |
Primary | Sensitivity Questionnaire-Visual Analog Scale 1 to 5 (1=No pain, 5=Worst pain possible) | Postoperative sensitivity | 2-Year Followup Assessments (approximately 2 years from Baseline) | |
Primary | FDI (World Dental Federation) Clinical Evaluation Criteria-Modified | Functional Properties, Biological Properties, Aesthetic Properties (1 clinically excellent-5 clinically poor Scale) | Baseline Followup Assessments | |
Primary | FDI (World Dental Federation) Clinical Evaluation Criteria-Modified | Functional Properties, Biological Properties, Aesthetic Properties (1 clinically excellent-5 clinically poor Scale) | 6-months Followup Assessments | |
Primary | FDI (World Dental Federation) Clinical Evaluation Criteria-Modified | Functional Properties, Biological Properties, Aesthetic Properties (1 clinically excellent-5 clinically poor Scale) | 1-year Followup Assessments | |
Primary | FDI (World Dental Federation) Clinical Evaluation Criteria-Modified | Functional Properties, Biological Properties, Aesthetic Properties (1 clinically excellent-5 clinically poor Scale) | 2-Year Followup Assessments |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT06242184 -
Post-operative Sensitivity in Resin Composites
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05298059 -
The Association of CPP-ACPF Associated With LASER in the Treatment of Tooth Sensitivity After at Home Bleaching
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05882760 -
Postoperative Sensitivity Following Placement With Different Restorative Materials In Vital Posterior Teeth
|
Phase 4 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06180707 -
Pregabalin Gel in Reducing Post-operative Tooth Sensitivity Surgery Caused by Bleaching With 35% Hydrogen Peroxide
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT06371092 -
Efficacy of a Desensitizing Agent During At-home Bleaching
|
Early Phase 1 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04248803 -
Evaluation of Gluma Desensitizer in Post-treatment Sensitivity in Posterior Composite
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06273930 -
Reduction of Dentine Hypersensitivity After Use of Different Dentifrices
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT06092567 -
Post-operative Sensitivity in Composite Restorations
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05789004 -
Efficacy of Tooth Bleaching With 35% and 6% Hydrogen Peroxide in Primary Dentition
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05923294 -
Two Different Graft Harvesting Techniques Applied in Localized Gingival Recessions
|
N/A |