Segmentectomy Clinical Trial
Official title:
Comparison of Energy Instruments and Stapling Device to Dissect Intersegmental Plane in Segmentectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
According to published studies, there are two main approaches in the dissection of intersegmental plane: stapling devices and energy instrument separation. However, only a few retrospective studies focused on the perioperative outcomes of these two approaches, and there has been no definitive conclusion about which method is better. So the investigators want to conduct a prospective study, trying to figure out this problem.
Lung cancer has been one of the most serious life-threatening diseases of human society. It has the highest morbidity and mortality worldwide among all the malignant tumors. Due to the popularization of low-dose CT and other means of examination, more and more patients with lung cancer are detected in the early phase of disease. Anatomical segmentectomy is one of the standard surgical procedures for these small pulmonary nodules or ground glass opacity (GGO), which are clinically highly suspected or puncture confirmed early lung cancer lesions. Dissection of the intersegmental plane in segmentectomy is a difficulty that have puzzled thoracic surgeons for decades because of the complicated anatomic relationship and variations, along with lack of boundary between pulmonary segments. There are two main approaches in the dissection of intersegmental plane: stapling devices and energy instrument separation. However, only a few retrospective studies focused on the perioperative outcomes of these two approaches in segmentectomy, not to mention in robot assisted segmentectomy, and there has been no definitive conclusion about which method is better. So the investigators want to conduct a prospective study, trying to figure out this problem. The investigators set incidence rate of postoperative complications as their primary endpoint. According to their calculation, a total of 136 patients will be enrolled (each group has 68 patients). ;
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT04842578 -
The Guidance of Thin Cross- Section of CT in Anatomic Segmentectomy
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05525923 -
OpalGenix (TS) - Personalized Postoperative Pain Management Following Thoracic Surgery in Adults
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT03227380 -
Morphologic Study of the Intersegmental Plane After Fully Thoracoscopic Segmentectomy
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT02816671 -
MicroCutter Assisted Thoracic Surgery Hemostasis Registry
|
||
Completed |
NCT04004494 -
3D Reconstruction in Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (VATS) Segmentectomy
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01775657 -
Digital Versus Analog Pleural Drainage Following Pulmonary Resection
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05717803 -
Segmentectomy for Ground Glass-dominant Invasive Lung Cancer (ECTOP-1012)
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT05350137 -
Application of Carbon Dioxide for Identifying the Intersegmental Plane in Thoracoscopic Segmentectomy
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT06132607 -
3D Lung Reconstructions Using Open-source Software for Lung Cancer Surgery
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05453721 -
Effect and Long-Term Outcomes of Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Imaging Method Versus Modified Inflation-Deflation Method in Identification of Intersegmental Plane(IMPLANE-0529)
|
N/A |