Office Worker Behavior and Health Study

Sedentary Behavior Clinical Trial

— OWBHS  

Official title:

Office Worker Behavior and Health Study

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT04042610
• Other study ID #: #5190289
• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: September 3, 2019
• Est. completion date: April 3, 2020

Study information

• Verified date: May 2023
• Source: Loma Linda University
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

This is a randomized intervention study to determine if electronic prompted interruptions in sitting time have an effect on job satisfaction, musculoskeletal complaints, and sitting time.

Description:

A sedentary lifestyle has been deemed deleterious to health. It contributes to many chronic diseases and illnesses as well as an increase in all-cause mortality. The objective of this study is to investigate if electronic prompted interruptions in sitting time can reduce sedentary behavior at work as well as have an effect on job satisfaction, and musculoskeletal complaints. The participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups, intervention (n=31) and control (n=31). Informed consent, demographic and socioeconomic data will be obtained from each participant. A questionnaire that includes three different scales will be administered before and after the 12-week intervention to all participants: Occupational Sitting and Physical Activity Questionnaire, Job Satisfaction Index, and Nordic Musculoskeletal Symptoms. Also, physical data will be measured: BMI, percent body fat and waist circumference. All participants will be provided with the Amazfit BIP device to track steps during work hours. The intervention group will receive a prompt every hour during their workday via an iOS application, Stand-Up, through the Amazfit BIP device. The prompt is to interrupt sitting time and encourage two-minutes of physical activity. The intervention group will receive examples of physical activity in addition to educational material on the health benefits of increasing physical activity in the workplace via verbal instruction and written materials. Data analysis will be conducted to determine if there is a difference in sitting time between the two groups over time using repeated-measures ANOVA. Independent samples t-tests will be used to compare job satisfaction and the physical biomarkers for obesity among the intervention and control groups. Chi-square will be used to analyze the reported musculoskeletal complaints between the two groups. If necessary, all analyses will be controlled for age, gender, race/ethnicity, and socioeconomic status.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 57
• Est. completion date: April 3, 2020
• Est. primary completion date: April 3, 2020
• Accepts healthy volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years to 65 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

In generally good health. Access to an IOS device for the duration of the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

Pregnancy. Use of activity equipment or devices in the workplace. Extreme exerciser: run marathons, participates in team or competitive sports/activities

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Sedentary Behavior

Intervention

Behavioral:
• Electronic Prompt for Interrupting Sitting Time
An electronic prompt via the IOS application Stand-Up will be given through the Amazfit BIP device to interrupt sitting time every hour during the office workers workday. The office worker will engage in 2 minutes of physical activity with each prompt.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
United States	La Sierra University	Riverside	California

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Loma Linda University

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

References & Publications (25)

Becker I, Wallmann-Sperlich B, Rupp R, Bucksch J. [Workplace Interventions to Reduce Sedentary Behavior: A Systematic Review]. Gesundheitswesen. 2019 Aug;81(8-09):606-614. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-112746. Epub 2017 Nov 6. German. — View Citation

Brayfield, A. H., & Rothe, H. F. (1951). An index of job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 35(5), 307-311. doi:10.1037/h0055617

Buman MP, Mullane SL, Toledo MJ, Rydell SA, Gaesser GA, Crespo NC, Hannan P, Feltes L, Vuong B, Pereira MA. An intervention to reduce sitting and increase light-intensity physical activity at work: Design and rationale of the 'Stand & Move at Work' group randomized trial. Contemp Clin Trials. 2017 Feb;53:11-19. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2016.12.008. Epub 2016 Dec 7. — View Citation

Chau JY, van der Ploeg HP, Merom D, Chey T, Bauman AE. Cross-sectional associations between occupational and leisure-time sitting, physical activity and obesity in working adults. Prev Med. 2012 Mar-Apr;54(3-4):195-200. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2011.12.020. Epub 2011 Dec 28. — View Citation

Church TS, Thomas DM, Tudor-Locke C, Katzmarzyk PT, Earnest CP, Rodarte RQ, Martin CK, Blair SN, Bouchard C. Trends over 5 decades in U.S. occupation-related physical activity and their associations with obesity. PLoS One. 2011;6(5):e19657. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0019657. Epub 2011 May 25. — View Citation

Commissaris DACM, Huysmans MA, Mathiassen SE, Srinivasan D, Koppes LLJ, Hendriksen IJM. Interventions to reduce sedentary behavior and increase physical activity during productive work: a systematic review. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2016 May 1;42(3):181-191. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3544. Epub 2015 Dec 18. — View Citation

Crawford, J. O. (2007). The Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire. Occupational Medicine, 57(4), 300-301. doi:10.1093/occmed/kqm036

Daneshmandi H, Choobineh A, Ghaem H, Karimi M. Adverse Effects of Prolonged Sitting Behavior on the General Health of Office Workers. J Lifestyle Med. 2017 Jul;7(2):69-75. doi: 10.15280/jlm.2017.7.2.69. Epub 2017 Jul 31. — View Citation

Duncan, M. D., Kazi, A., & Haslam, C. O. (2013/05/16/May 16-19, 2013). Sedentary behaviour at work: The impact on employee health.

Dunstan DW, Howard B, Healy GN, Owen N. Too much sitting--a health hazard. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2012 Sep;97(3):368-76. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2012.05.020. Epub 2012 Jun 9. — View Citation

Ektor-Andersen J, Orbaek P, Isacsson SO; Malmo Shoulder-Neck Study Group. Behaviour-focused pain coping: consistency and convergence to work capability of the swedish version of the chronic pain coping inventory. J Rehabil Med. 2002 Jan;34(1):33-9. doi: 10.1080/165019702317242686. — View Citation

Foley B, Engelen L, Gale J, Bauman A, Mackey M. Sedentary Behavior and Musculoskeletal Discomfort Are Reduced When Office Workers Trial an Activity-Based Work Environment. J Occup Environ Med. 2016 Sep;58(9):924-31. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000000828. — View Citation

Gibbs BB, Hergenroeder AL, Katzmarzyk PT, Lee IM, Jakicic JM. Definition, measurement, and health risks associated with sedentary behavior. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2015 Jun;47(6):1295-300. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000517. — View Citation

Gilson ND, Ng N, Pavey TG, Ryde GC, Straker L, Brown WJ. Project Energise: Using participatory approaches and real time computer prompts to reduce occupational sitting and increase work time physical activity in office workers. J Sci Med Sport. 2016 Nov;19(11):926-930. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2016.01.009. Epub 2016 Feb 18. — View Citation

Healy GN, Eakin EG, Owen N, Lamontagne AD, Moodie M, Winkler EA, Fjeldsoe BS, Wiesner G, Willenberg L, Dunstan DW. A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial to Reduce Office Workers' Sitting Time: Effect on Activity Outcomes. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016 Sep;48(9):1787-97. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000972. — View Citation

Jancey J, Tye M, McGann S, Blackford K, Lee AH. Application of the Occupational Sitting and Physical Activity Questionnaire (OSPAQ) to office based workers. BMC Public Health. 2014 Jul 29;14:762. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-762. — View Citation

Loghmani A, Golshiri P, Zamani A, Kheirmand M, Jafari N. Musculoskeletal symptoms and job satisfaction among office-workers: a cross-sectional study from Iran. Acta Med Acad. 2013;42(1):46-54. doi: 10.5644/ama2006-124.70. — View Citation

McGuckin T, Sealey R, Barnett F. Planning for sedentary behaviour interventions: office workers' survey and focus group responses. Perspect Public Health. 2017 Nov;137(6):316-321. doi: 10.1177/1757913917698003. Epub 2017 Mar 25. — View Citation

Parry S, Straker L, Gilson ND, Smith AJ. Participatory workplace interventions can reduce sedentary time for office workers--a randomised controlled trial. PLoS One. 2013 Nov 12;8(11):e78957. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078957. eCollection 2013. — View Citation

Proper KI, Singh AS, van Mechelen W, Chinapaw MJ. Sedentary behaviors and health outcomes among adults: a systematic review of prospective studies. Am J Prev Med. 2011 Feb;40(2):174-82. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.10.015. — View Citation

Raynor HA, Bond DS, Freedson PS, Sisson SB. Sedentary behaviors, weight, and health and disease risks. J Obes. 2012;2012:852743. doi: 10.1155/2012/852743. Epub 2011 Dec 11. No abstract available. — View Citation

Shrestha N, Kukkonen-Harjula KT, Verbeek JH, Ijaz S, Hermans V, Pedisic Z. Workplace interventions for reducing sitting at work. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 20;6(6):CD010912. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010912.pub4. — View Citation

Thorp AA, Kingwell BA, Owen N, Dunstan DW. Breaking up workplace sitting time with intermittent standing bouts improves fatigue and musculoskeletal discomfort in overweight/obese office workers. Occup Environ Med. 2014 Nov;71(11):765-71. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2014-102348. Epub 2014 Aug 28. — View Citation

Urda JL, Lynn JS, Gorman A, Larouere B. Effects of a Minimal Workplace Intervention to Reduce Sedentary Behaviors and Improve Perceived Wellness in Middle-Aged Women Office Workers. J Phys Act Health. 2016 Aug;13(8):838-44. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2015-0385. Epub 2016 Mar 21. — View Citation

Valipour Noroozi, M., Hajibabaei, M., Saki, A., & Memari, Z. (2015). Prevalence of Musculoskeletal Disorders Among Office Workers. Jundishapur Journal of Health Sciencei, 7(1), e27157. doi:10.5812/jjhs.27157

* Note: There are 25 references in all — Click here to view all references

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Sitting Time	Percent of time sitting in a typical workday	Change measure: baseline and 6 weeks
Primary	Activity in steps	The number of steps taken during their workday	Change measure: week 2 and 6 weeks
Secondary	An Index of Job Satisfaction	This index is by Brayfield and Rothe. There are eighteen questions which assess job satisfaction utilizing a 5-point Likert scale.	Change measure: baseline and 8 weeks
Secondary	Musculoskeletal complaints questionnaire	The questionnaire is also known as the Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire. It uses Yes or No response to assess whether or not the participant has had musculoskeletal trouble in their neck, shoulders, upper back, elbows, wrists/hands, lower back, hips/thighs, knees, or ankles/feet over the past twelve months, if musculoskeletal problems have prevented normal function or working during the past twelve months, or if there has been musculoskeletal trouble during the past seven days.	Change measure: baseline and 8 weeks