Clinical Trials Logo

Sedation clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Sedation.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT03406546 Terminated - Sedation Clinical Trials

Sedation Strategies for Therapeutic Bronchoscopy

Start date: February 1, 2018
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Therapeutic bronchoscopy is a common procedure to treat respiratory diseases. The procedure includes stent implantation, bronchus dilation, electronic incision, laser therapy, and so on. Most of these procedures are painful and require general anesthesia. Conventionally, the general anesthesia for therapeutic bronchoscopy was performed using laryngeal mask. But in the previous experiences, the investigators found that sedation with dexmedetomidine and remifentanil was as effect as laryngeal mask anesthesia. The present study was performed to compare the two approach for sedation or anesthesia in therapeutic bronchoscopy.

NCT ID: NCT03406533 Terminated - Sedation Clinical Trials

Sedation Strategies for Diagnostic Bronchoscopy

Start date: February 1, 2018
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Diagnostic bronchoscopy is an invasive procedure performed to diagnose respiratory diseases. But pain has been complained by most of the patients receiving such procedures. Sedation or anesthesia was required by both of the patients and bronchoscopists. Unfortunately, no consensus has been made upon the sedation strategies. Multiple sedation approaches have been applied, such as midazolam and fentanyl, remifentanil and propofol, dexmedetomidine and propofol. The present study was designed to compare these protocols in sedation for diagnostic bronchoscopy.

NCT ID: NCT03399019 Recruiting - Sedation Clinical Trials

Bispectral Index(BIS) on Depth of Sedation With Dexmedetomidine, Propofol and Midazolam During Spinal Anesthesia

BIS
Start date: September 5, 2016
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

This study is to investigate on the objective relevance between bispectral index (BIS) and Observer's assessment of alertness/sedation (OAA/S) scale in patients sedated with Midazolam, propofol and dexmedetomidine during spinal anesthesia. Also, we will evaluate the reflection of actual sedation levels on BIS monitoring.

NCT ID: NCT03343873 Recruiting - Sedation Clinical Trials

The Effects of Different Anesthetics on Functional Connectivity

ACTION
Start date: April 1, 2017
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

This research is a prospective cohort study. The aim of the study is to determine different levels of sedative mechanism and the effect on brain functional connectivity of midazolam, dexmedetomidine and propofol.

NCT ID: NCT03293277 Recruiting - Sedation Clinical Trials

Safety, Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Intranasal Dexmedetomidine in Healthy Subjects

Start date: July 26, 2017
Phase: Phase 1
Study type: Interventional

The aim of this study is to investigate the safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics of intranasal dexmedetomidine, and comparative pharmacokinetics of intranasally and intravenously administered dexmedetomidine in healthy volunteers.

NCT ID: NCT03285165 Suspended - Sedation Clinical Trials

Cerebral Vascular Effects of Dexmedetomidine Versus Propofol Sedation in Intubated Mechanically Ventilated ICU Patients

DEXSEDATION
Start date: September 14, 2017
Phase: Phase 2/Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

Serial transcranial Doppler (TCD) exams in healthy volunteers and in animal models showed a strong linear relationship between middle cerebral artery (MCA) flow velocity (FV) and dexmedetomidine infusion. The concomitant elevation of pulsatility index (PI) indicates vasoconstriction of the cerebral vasculature as the most profound underlying mechanism.

NCT ID: NCT03285087 Suspended - Sedation Clinical Trials

Risk Prediction of Dexmedetomidine-associated Hemodynamic Instability

DEXSEDATION
Start date: June 2021
Phase: Phase 2/Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

Hypotension and bradycardia have been commonly associated with dexmedetomidine therapy, occurring in 13% to 68% and 1% to 42% of patients, respectively. The variability in reported incidence may be partially attributed to inconsistent definitions and study populations. The significance of this hemodynamic instability is not only highlighted by its high incidence but also the need for corrective interventions. In one study, hemodynamic instability requiring clinical intervention occurred in nearly one third of ICU patients receiving dexmedetomidine. Moreover, patients who experienced dexmedetomidine-associated hypotension had a higher mortality rate than those who did not.

NCT ID: NCT03283150 Terminated - Sedation Clinical Trials

Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) Sedation

Start date: December 1, 2017
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of different brain nuclei is a treatment for multiple brain disorders. The subthalamic nucleus (STN) and globus pallidus have been used to treat advanced Parkinson's disease for a long time. The ventral intermediate nucleus of the thalamus is an effective target for treating essential tremor patients. STN and the internal segment of the globus pallidus are useful targets for treating dystonia. To achieve this optimal electrode localization, many centers perform electrophysiological mapping of the target nuclei using microelectrode recording (MER). This way they can achieve precise localization of the electrode. During the mapping procedure, microelectrodes are passed through the target nuclei, and the electrical neuronal activity is observed and recorded. The surgical team can identify the precise location of the target nuclei and its borders according to the typical activity of its neurons. This study will compare the activity of neurons in several DBS targets before, during and after sedation with propofol, remifentanil and dexmedetomidine. The goal is to understand the effects of anesthetics on the neuronal activity in these targets, allowing us to choose the most appropriate sedation protocol to use during implantation of DBS electrodes in deep brain structures (bearing in mind that each structure may have a different optimal protocol).

NCT ID: NCT03246724 Completed - Surgery Clinical Trials

Oral Versus Intravenous Sedation for Ocular Procedures

Start date: October 16, 2017
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this study is to evaluate patient satisfaction after eye surgery when given a capsule compared to an intravenous (IV) dose of sedation (calming medication). Each subject will be given a capsule and an IV in the hospital before their procedure starts, however they will not know which one is the sedation route. Each subject will have their planned surgical procedure as previously discussed with their doctor. After the procedure is completed, the doctors will complete satisfaction surveys. The subject will also complete a satisfaction survey during their regularly scheduled visit the day after surgery. Once the subject completes this survey, their study participation will be complete. The hypothesis is that there will be no difference in patient satisfaction when given a capsule in comparison to IV sedation. If the results of the study support this hypothesis, a capsule could be used in place of IV sedation. By using a capsule for ocular procedures, both patients and the medical practice would benefit: patient would be able to eat before their procedure, patient costs would be decreased, hospital costs would be reduced, and some of these procedures would be given the option to move to a procedure room (freeing up operating room time for other departments).

NCT ID: NCT03235609 Not yet recruiting - Sedation Clinical Trials

Sedation During Pediatric Diagnostic Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Start date: August 16, 2017
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

comparison between propofol-fentanyl and propofol-ketamine for sedation in pediatric diagnostic gastrointestinal endoscopy.