Second-degree Burn Clinical Trial
Official title:
Comparative Prospective Study of Mepilex Ag vs. Xeroform in Pediatric Patients That Sustain Partial Thickness Burn Injury
Verified date | October 2019 |
Source | Wayne State University |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
Pediatric patients that sustain partial thickness burn injuries to their extremities require regular scheduled dressings and weekly appointments for better healing. Typically, the dressing used at Children's Hospital of Michigan is Xeroform, which can often be painful when changing at the weekly clinic appointment. Mepilex Ag is also an approved treatment for these types of burns and has the potential to cause less pain with dressing changes, however is not used as frequently due to a much higher cost. Studies evaluating the treatment of partial thickness burns in pediatric patients have shown decreased cost and length of stay associated with dressings that are silver impregnated, like Mepilex Ag. However, these studies are all retrospective with a possible selection bias to patients. In addition, several studies have suggested less pain with newer foam and hydrofiber dressings. We are conducting a prospective study using patients with partial thickness burns of their extremities, applying Xeroform on half of the burn, and Mepilex Ag on the other half of the burn, to remove confounding variables between patients to determine the optimal burn dressing for partial thickness scald burns for pediatric patients. A partial thickness burn, also known as a second degree burn, extends into the top two layers of the skin, not passing the hypodermis. Our goal is to determine if Xeroform or Mepilex Ag is superior treatment for partial thickness burns in pediatric patients for healing time, appearance of scar, and patient pain and comfort during treatment and dressing changes.
Status | Withdrawn |
Enrollment | 0 |
Est. completion date | September 1, 2022 |
Est. primary completion date | September 1, 2021 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 7 Years to 17 Years |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Patients under age 17 presenting to Children's Hospital of Michigan burn center or burn clinic with partial thickness, second degree scald burns to extremities. - Burn of 1% TBSA or greater - Within 48 hours of injury. - Signed consent form (and oral assent for patients ages 7-12 or written assent for patients 13 years of age or greater). Exclusion Criteria: - Flame burns - age over 18 years - infection - skin graft or donor site - burns greater than 48 hours old. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United States | Children's Hospital of Michigan | Detroit | Michigan |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Wayne State University |
United States,
Bugmann P, Taylor S, Gyger D, Lironi A, Genin B, Vunda A, La Scala G, Birraux J, Le Coultre C. A silicone-coated nylon dressing reduces healing time in burned paediatric patients in comparison with standard sulfadiazine treatment: a prospective randomized trial. Burns. 1998 Nov;24(7):609-12. doi: 10.1016/s0305-4179(98)00095-3. — View Citation
Dykes PJ, Heggie R. The link between the peel force of adhesive dressings and subjective discomfort in volunteer subjects. J Wound Care. 2003 Jul;12(7):260-2. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2003.12.7.26567. — View Citation
Gotschall CS, Morrison MI, Eichelberger MR. Prospective, randomized study of the efficacy of Mepitel on children with partial-thickness scalds. J Burn Care Rehabil. 1998 Jul-Aug;19(4):279-83. doi: 10.1097/00004630-199807000-00002. — View Citation
Hollinworth H, Collier M. Nurses' views about pain and trauma at dressing changes: results of a national survey. J Wound Care. 2000 Sep;9(8):369-73. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2000.9.8.26282. — View Citation
O'Donovan DA, Mehdi SY, Eadie PA. The role of Mepitel silicone net dressings in the management of fingertip injuries in children. J Hand Surg Br. 1999 Dec;24(6):727-30. doi: 10.1054/jhsb.1999.0270. — View Citation
Platt AJ, Phipps A, Judkins K. A comparative study of silicone net dressing and paraffin gauze dressing in skin-grafted sites. Burns. 1996 Nov;22(7):543-5. doi: 10.1016/0305-4179(96)00035-6. — View Citation
Williams G, Withey S, Walker CC. Longstanding pigmentary changes in paediatric scalds dressed with a non-adherent siliconised dressing. Burns. 2001 Mar;27(2):200-2. doi: 10.1016/s0305-4179(00)00082-6. — View Citation
Winter GD (1975) Methods for the biological evaluation of dressings. In: Turner TD, Brain KR, eds. Surgical Dressings in the Hospital Environment. Surgical Dressings Research Unit, UWIST, Cardiff: 47-81
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Scar Evaluation | Vancouver Scar Scale: 0 is defined as normal in all instances
Vascularity: 0 to 3 Pigmentation: 0 to 3 Pliability/Elasticity: 0 to 5 Height: 0 to 3 Pain: 0 to 2 Itchiness: 0 to 2 |
burn injury healing time; up to 10 weeks | |
Secondary | Dressing Change Survey | Ease of application: 1 to 3; 3 is easiest
Pain during application: 1 to 10; 10 is most painful |
during the burn injury treatment, up to 10 weeks |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT02108535 -
Comparative Analysis of Cost-effectiveness of Silver Dressing in Burns
|
Phase 4 | |
Recruiting |
NCT03048188 -
Manuka Honey in Second- and Grafted Third-degree Burns
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03530150 -
Pirfenidone and Its Role in Burn Wound Healing
|
Phase 2 |