View clinical trials related to Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis.
Filter by:This study is to assess the onset of action of fixed drug combination of azelastine hydrochloride and fluticasone propionate nasal spray (MP-AzeFlu) in treating the nasal symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) induced by an allergen challenge in an Environmental Exposure Chamber (EEC).
This study is aimed at assessing the efficacy of supplementation with a mixture of three bifidobacteria , on the allergic rhinitis..The rhinitis symptoms were assessed by validated score ( TSS ) , for children aged between 4 and 17 years with allergic rhinitis parietaria , mild , moderate or severe , than children not supplemented . Secondary Objectives - The effectiveness of treatment by VAS : - Evaluation of the rescue medication consumption - Evaluation of quality of life ( using structured questionnaire ) - Evaluation of the frequency and school performance ( using structured questionnaire ) - Assessment of sleep quality and attention (through structured questionnaire ) - Satisfaction rating and satisfaction of parents - Evaluation of asthma exacerbations in children susceptible
Study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of GSP 301 NS compared to placebo NS and to individual monotherapies (comparators) as well as the efficacy of these monotherapies (comparators) versus placebo NS over 14 days of study treatment
There is increasing evidence that the effectiveness of allergy immunotherapy to control symptoms of rhinoconjunctivitis is related to the cumulative dose of allergen or allergoid administered during a single regimen of subcutaneous (SC) injections or of sublingual administration. The current therapeutic dose regimen for Grass MATA MPL is a course of four injections of 300, 800, 2000 and 2000 SU (Standardized Units), administered at weekly intervals (cumulative dose 5100 SU). Two new cumulative doses of the Grass MATA MPL 10200 SU and 18200 SU are being developed to compare with the current dose. The study is designed to explore the benefit/risk of increasing the cumulative allergen dose of the Grass MATA MPL immunotherapy comparing these doses with the current dose of Grass MATA MPL, Grass MATA (without MPL) and placebo.
ASIT naïve patients sensitized to grass pollens will be recruited for the study. All of them will be instructed to treat bothersome in-season symptoms when they appear (on as needed, pro re nata basis) with rescue medication. They will be given 5 different options and will be informed about the effects of each of them in order to make their optimal choice for different symptoms and their combination: local decongestant (xylomethazoline, when congestion is leading), local antihistamine (azelastine, when itching, sneezing and rhinorhea a predominant), nasal corticosteroid (momethasone, when all nasal symptoms are pressing and no adequate relief is obtained form the other 2 local treatments), oral antihistamine (bilastine, when itching and sneezing persist despite the local treatments) and oral corticosteroid (prednisolone, when any or all symptoms become unbearable despite the other suggested treatments). Patients who are reluctant to use immunotherapy or who are too late to initiate it will be randomized to be treated with the listed medications on as needed basis, the nasally applied formulations will be followed by either HPMC to prolong and enhance their effect (Group HPMC) or placebo (lactose powder) (Group Placebo) to serve as control. Patients indicated and willing to carry out ASIT will be treated according to the standard protocol with grass allergens sublingually (Staloral #688) and will receive rescue medication (Group Immunotherapy).
Single-center, double-masked, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, efficacy and safety study using the Allergen BioCube (ABC).
This is an efficacy and safety study of desloratadine (MK-4117) in Japanese participants with seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR). The primary hypothesis of this study is that the change from Baseline in Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) is improved by desloratadine compared to placebo.
Study to evaluate the two different strengths and dose regimen of GSP 301 to be effective in treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis.
This study is to evaluate the equivalence of generic Azelastine Hydrochloride and Fluticasone Propionate Nasal Spray with that of the marketed drug, Dymista™ Nasal Spray, in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis, and to evaluate the safety and tolerability of generic Azelastine Hydrochloride and Fluticasone Propionate nasal spray compared with Dymista™ nasal spray.
This study is to evaluate the equivalence of generic ciclesonide nasal spray with that of the marketed drug, Omnaris™ nasal spray, in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis, and to evaluate the safety and tolerability of generic ciclesonide nasal spray compared with Omnaris™ nasal spray.