Scleroderma Clinical Trial
— TOSSOfficial title:
Taking Charge of Systemic Sclerosis: Improving Patient Outcomes Through Self-management
Verified date | August 2019 |
Source | University of Michigan |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
This Study is a collaborative project with partners (people with scleroderma and stakeholders) designed to refine an internet program for patients with scleroderma and to compare the internet program to an authoritative educational book (Taking Charge of Systemic Sclerosis [TOSS]). During a 16-week comparative effectiveness 16-week randomized controlled trial, the investigators will recruit up to 250 patients who will be randomized to either TOSS or authoritative book for patients, The Scleroderma Book: A Guide for Patients and Families.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 267 |
Est. completion date | February 2018 |
Est. primary completion date | July 28, 2017 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - All participants will be residents of the United States - Diagnosed with systemic scleroderma, - 18 years of age - Possess basic computer literacy and have access to a computer with Internet and email capabilities - Have the ability to communicate in English Exclusion Criteria: - No computer access - Inability to communicate in English |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United States | University of Michigan | Ann Arbor | Michigan |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
University of Michigan | Medical University of South Carolina, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, University of New Mexico |
United States,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Other | Change in PHQ-8 | The Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8) is an 8-item questionnaire that is commonly used to measure depressive symptoms. A score of =10 is consistent with depressed mood with a score ranging from 0 to 24. | Baseline compared to 16 weeks and 6 months | |
Primary | Change in Managing Symptoms Scale on the PROMIS® Self-efficacy Short Form 8 | Managing Symptoms score on the PROMIS® Self-efficacy Short Form 8 consists of 8 items scored from 1 (not at all confident) to 5 (very confident), this provides a raw score. The raw score is translated to a T-Score using a conversion table supplied by the Assessment Center. A score of 50 is the average for the US general population with a standard deviation of 10. Higher scores are indicative of greater ability to manage symptoms. | Baseline compared with 16 weeks, 6 months | |
Secondary | Change in Quality of Life on the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Index Scale | EQ-5D index scale uses a conversion algorithm to convert the raw scores into a health utility measure, ranging from 0.0 (death) to 1.0 (full or optimal health). | Baseline compared with 16 weeks, 6 months | |
Secondary | Change in Confidence in Self Management on the Patient Activation Measure Scale | The Patient Activation Measure (PAM) is a 13-item measure that assesses patient knowledge, skill, and confidence for self-management. Each item is scored from 1 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree). PAM scores were categorized into 4 levels: level 1, the individual is disengaged/overwhelmed; level 2, the individual is aware but struggling; level 3, the individual is taking action;and level 4, the individual is maintaining behavior. The analysis will look at any change in these levels where level 4 denotes someone as full "activated". | Baseline compared with 16 weeks, 6 months | |
Secondary | Change in Brief Satisfaction on the Satisfaction With Appearance Scale (SWAP) Scale | The Brief Satisfaction with Appearance Scale (SWAP) is a 6-item scale measuring body image concerns and social discomfort with body parts. It is scored from 0 to 36, with higher scores associated with greater dissatisfaction. | Baseline compared with 16 weeks, 6 months | |
Secondary | Change in Managing Daily Activities Scale on the PROMIS® Self-efficacy Short Form 8 | Managing Daily Activities score on the PROMIS® Self-efficacy Short Form 8 consists of 8 items scored from 1 (not at all confident) to 5 (very confident), this provides a raw score. The raw score is translated to a T-Score using a conversion table supplied by the Assessment Center. A score of 50 is the average for the US general population with a standard deviation of 10. Higher scores are indicative of greater ability to manage symptoms. | Baseline compared to 16 weeks and 6 months | |
Secondary | Change in Managing Emotions Scale on the PROMIS® Self-efficacy Short Form 8 | Managing Emotions score on the PROMIS® Self-efficacy Short Form 8 consists of 8 items scored from 1 (not at all confident) to 5 (very confident), this provides a raw score. The raw score is translated to a T-Score using a conversion table supplied by the Assessment Center. A score of 50 is the average for the US general population with a standard deviation of 10. Higher scores are indicative of greater ability to manage symptoms. | Baseline compared to 16 weeks and 6 months | |
Secondary | Change in Managing Medications and Treatment Scale on the PROMIS® Self-efficacy Short Form 8 | Managing Medication and Treatment score on the PROMIS® Self-efficacy Short Form 8 consists of 8 items scored from 1 (not at all confident) to 5 (very confident), this provides a raw score. The raw score is translated to a T-Score using a conversion table supplied by the Assessment Center. A score of 50 is the average for the US general population with a standard deviation of 10. Higher scores are indicative of greater ability to manage symptoms. | Baseline compared to 16 weeks and 6 months | |
Secondary | Change in Managing Social Interactions Scale on the PROMIS® Self-efficacy Short Form 8 | Managing Social Interactions score on the PROMIS® Self-efficacy Short Form 8 consists of 8 items scored from 1 (not at all confident) to 5 (very confident), this provides a raw score. The raw score is translated to a T-Score using a conversion table supplied by the Assessment Center. A score of 50 is the average for the US general population with a standard deviation of 10. Higher scores are indicative of greater ability to manage symptoms. | Baseline compared to 16 weeks and 6 months | |
Secondary | Change in Physical Function Scale on the PROMIS® 29 Profile v 2.0 Outcome Measure | Physical Function domain in the PROMIS-29 Profile v2.0® are scored from 1 (unable to do/never/not at all) to 5 (without any difficulty/always/very much), this provides a raw score. The raw score is translated to a T-Score using a conversion table supplied by the Assessment Center. A score of 50 is the average for the US general population with a standard deviation of 10. A higher score represents better physical function, a lower score represents poorer physical function. | Baseline compared to 16 weeks and 6 months | |
Secondary | Change in Social Role Scale on the PROMIS® 29 Profile v 2.0 Outcome Measure | Social role domain in the PROMIS-29 Profile v2.0® are scored from 1 (unable to do/never/not at all) to 5 (without any difficulty/always/very much), this provides a raw score. The raw score is translated to a T-Score using a conversion table supplied by the Assessment Center. A score of 50 is the average for the US general population with a standard deviation of 10. A higher score represents better social role functioning and a lower score represents poorer social role functioning. | Baseline compared to 16 weeks and 6 months | |
Secondary | Change in Anxiety Scale on the PROMIS® 29 Profile v 2.0 Outcome Measure | Anxiety domain in the PROMIS-29 Profile v2.0® are scored from 1 (unable to do/never/not at all) to 5 (without any difficulty/always/very much), this provides a raw score. The raw score is translated to a T-Score using a conversion table supplied by the Assessment Center. A score of 50 is the average for the US general population with a standard deviation of 10. A higher score represents worse symptomatology, a lower score represents better symptomatology. | Baseline compared to 16 weeks and 6 months | |
Secondary | Change in Depression Scale on the PROMIS® 29 Profile v 2.0 Outcome Measure | Depression domain in the PROMIS-29 Profile v2.0® are scored from 1 (unable to do/never/not at all) to 5 (without any difficulty/always/very much), this provides a raw score. The raw score is translated to a T-Score using a conversion table supplied by the Assessment Center. A score of 50 is the average for the US general population with a standard deviation of 10. A higher score represents worse symptomatology, a lower score represents better symptomatology. | Baseline compared to 16 weeks and 6 months | |
Secondary | Change in Fatigue Scale on the PROMIS® 29 Profile v 2.0 Outcome Measure | Fatigue domain in the PROMIS-29 Profile v2.0® are scored from 1 (unable to do/never/not at all) to 5 (without any difficulty/always/very much), this provides a raw score. The raw score is translated to a T-Score using a conversion table supplied by the Assessment Center. A score of 50 is the average for the US general population with a standard deviation of 10. A higher score represents worse symptomatology, a lower score represents better symptomatology. | Baseline compared to 16 weeks and 6 months | |
Secondary | Change Pain Interference Scale on the PROMIS® 29 Profile v 2.0 Outcome Measure | Pain interference domain in the PROMIS-29 Profile v2.0® are scored from 1 (unable to do/never/not at all) to 5 (without any difficulty/always/very much), this provides a raw score. The raw score is translated to a T-Score using a conversion table supplied by the Assessment Center. A score of 50 is the average for the US general population with a standard deviation of 10. A higher score represents worse symptomatology, a lower score represents better symptomatology. | Baseline compared to 16 weeks and 6 months | |
Secondary | Change in Visual Analogue Scale Pain Intensity Scale on the PROMIS® 29 Profile v 2.0 Outcome Measure | The visual analogue scale pain intensity in the PROMIS-29 Profile v2.0® is scored as 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst imaginable pain. | Baseline compared to 16 weeks and 6 months | |
Secondary | Change in Sleep Disturbance Scale on the PROMIS® 29 Profile v 2.0 Outcome Measure | Sleep disturbance domain in the PROMIS-29 Profile v2.0® are scored from 1 (unable to do/never/not at all) to 5 (without any difficulty/always/very much),this provides a raw score. The raw score is translated to a T-Score using a conversion table supplied by the Assessment Center. A score of 50 is the average for the US general population with a standard deviation of 10. A higher score represents worse symptomatology, a lower score represents better symptomatology. | Baseline compared to 16 weeks and 6 months |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT02798055 -
Bosentan Treatment of Digital Ulcers Related to Systemic Sclerosis
|
||
Completed |
NCT01959815 -
Novel Screening Strategies for Scleroderma PAH
|
||
Completed |
NCT03274076 -
Evaluation of Tofacitinib in Early Diffuse Cutaneous Systemic Sclerosis (dcSSc)
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT02915835 -
Riociguat in Scleroderma Associated Digital Ulcers
|
Phase 2 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT01895244 -
Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for Progressive Systemic Sclerosis
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT00883129 -
Comparison of Therapeutic Regimens for Scleroderma Interstitial Lung Disease (The Scleroderma Lung Study II)
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT00930683 -
A Study to Evaluate Safety and Tolerability of Multiple Doses of MEDI-546 in Adult Subjects With Scleroderma
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT00074568 -
Scleroderma Registry
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT04797286 -
Sildenafil for Early Pulmonary Vascular Disease in Scleroderma
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT03222492 -
Brentuximab Vedotin for Systemic Sclerosis
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT03207997 -
MRI Quantification of Pulmonary Fibrosis in Scleroderma Patients
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04464434 -
Upfront Autologous HSCT Versus Immunosuppression in Early Diffuse Cutaneous Systemic Sclerosis
|
Phase 4 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04246528 -
SPIN Self-Management Feasibility Trial With Progression to Full-scale Trial (SPIN-SELF)
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05080738 -
Upper Extremity Home Exercises in Patients With Scleroderma
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03726398 -
CompRehensive Phenotypic Characterization of Patients With Scleroderma-Associated ILD and PH
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05085444 -
A Study of CD19/BCMA Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells Therapy for Patients With Refractory Scleroderma
|
Early Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT02062125 -
Calcinosis in a Single-Center Scleroderma Population
|
||
Completed |
NCT04588714 -
Feasibility and Preliminary Effects of the Resilience-based, Energy Management to Enhance Wellbeing in Systemic Sclerosis (RENEW) Intervention
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05635266 -
Tissue Repository Providing Annotated Biospecimens for Approved Investigator-directed Biomedical Research Initiatives
|
||
Completed |
NCT02835196 -
Optical Elastography of Systemic Sclerosis Skin
|