Sciatica Clinical Trial
Official title:
A Pilot Study of Chiropractic Prone Distraction for Subacute Back Pain With Sciatica
Back pain is a major cause of disability in the United States. The lifetime prevalence of
low back pain is estimated at 60-90%. Back pain has conservatively been estimated to involve
total direct and indirect costs of over $25 billion annually in lost wages, treatment, and
related issues. These losses clearly extend to the active duty population cared for by
military health care facilities.
Chiropractic medicine is characterized by the use of a number of physical manipulations and
mobilization techniques, which can be used singly or in combination to treat a variety of
medical conditions. Although basic clinical practice guidelines for Chiropractic have been
developed, few studies have rigorously compared techniques and their outcomes for specific
conditions. Fewer still have sought to correlate treatment modality with both anatomical
effect and clinical outcome.
Throughout the military, Chiropractic care is available only to active duty personnel and
only at a limited number of medical treatment facilities. At National Naval Medical Center,
it is a well-established treatment option, where the full array of techniques is employed,
primarily for painful conditions, and most often for back pain. This study seeks to clarify
the mechanisms of action and efficacy of one specific treatment option, prone distraction,
for the relief of subacute sciatica due to radiographically confirmed herniated disc, and to
compare it to side-posture manipulation and standard medical management.
Prone lumbar distraction utilizes a specialized table with motorized continual motion
distraction. This table has multiple mechanical articulations that can be used to place
patients in a wide variety of positions. Patients being treated with continuous motion
distraction are placed prone with the table positioned for maximum comfort and
centralization of symptoms.
Side posture manipulation is a widely practiced, standard chiropractic technique, which has
been shown to provide considerable clinical improvement for patients with sciatica. Low-
grade oscillatory stresses are performed within the physiological range of normal joint
motion. The hip, pelvis and lumbar spine are rotated forward with manual pressure while a
counter rotation of the chest and thoracic spine is applied.
Status | Terminated |
Enrollment | 60 |
Est. completion date | June 2006 |
Est. primary completion date | June 2006 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | Both |
Age group | 18 Years to 45 Years |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Active Duty military personnel - Aged 18-45 (age is limited to 45 years due to the natural aging and degeneration of the discs; the less hydration the disc maintain, the less likely manipulation will be successful). - Have subacute low back pain (more than three months duration but less than six months duration), with radicular component (sciatica) rated at a minimum level of 4 on the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) of the Brief Pain Inventory - Have a confirmed herniated disc, as noted on MRI, which correlates with the clinical findings (sciatica) In this study, a "herniated disc" refers to any localized displacement of disc material, including nucleus, cartilage, fragmented apophyseal bone, or fragmented anular tissue, which results in back and leg pain. "Herniated Disc" also will include disc extrusions and disc bulges (protrusions) only when with associated annular tears. In this study, "sciatica" refers to pain in the lower extremity/ies that follows the course of the sciatic nerve Exclusion Criteria: - Patients who are not able to give informed consent. - Pregnant or nursing women - Patients who have a primary bone disease, cancer, infection, spondylolysis or spondylolisthesis. - Patients who have had prior spine surgery, including rhizotomy - Participation in another conflicting research study - Patients who cannot commit to a trial lasting up to eight weeks or cannot come for bi-weekly treatments - Patients who are going through a course of physical therapy or chiropractic treatment or at the time of planned enrollment or are being currently being managed and/or treated for any pain condition - Patients who have an unstable medical or psychiatric condition - Patients who are planning or have been advised to have spine surgery - Any contraindications to either prone distraction or side posture manipulation will disqualify potential subjects from any participation in this study - Patients with a pacemaker. |
Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Factorial Assignment, Masking: Single Blind (Subject), Primary Purpose: Treatment
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United States | National Naval Medical Center | Bethesda | Maryland |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Samueli Institute for Information Biology | National Naval Medical Center |
United States,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Change in overall leg pain intensity, as assessed by the change, if any, of leg pain documented on the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) in the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) from baseline to 8 weeks | |||
Primary | Time to pain relief, defined as NRS less than 4 after 2 consecutive visits | |||
Secondary | Change in overall back pain intensity, as assessed by the change, if any, of back pain documented on the BPI from baseline to 8 weeks | |||
Secondary | Change in overall pain intensity, as assessed by the change, if any, of the sum of back and leg pain documented on the BPI at measured intervals | |||
Secondary | Change in overall pain intensity, as assessed by the change, if any, of the sum of back and leg pain documented on the BPI from baseline to 8 weeks | |||
Secondary | Patient satisfaction with treatment, as assessed by The Client Satisfaction Questionnaire | |||
Secondary | Medication use, as assessed by the Medication Log | |||
Secondary | Functional disability, as assessed by The Roland-Morris Low Back Pain and Disability Questionnaire | |||
Secondary | Lost/decreased workdays | |||
Secondary | Change, if any, in percent of disc herniation, as determined by the study neuroradiologist | |||
Secondary | Descriptive changes in disc morphology, as assessed by the study neuroradiologist | |||
Secondary | Variability of treatment, as assessed by the number or prescriptions written, the number of visits to the Primary Care Clinic, as well as the number of referrals to additional treatments outside of the chiropractic clinic |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT02384928 -
Effects of Shinbaro Pharmacopuncture in Sciatic Pain Patients With Lumbar Disc Herniation
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05626140 -
COMPARISON OF EFFICACY OF DIFFERENT DRUG COMBINATIONS IN ACUTE SCIATICA
|
Phase 3 | |
Withdrawn |
NCT02313350 -
Intradiscal Discogel® in Resistant Sciatica
|
N/A | |
Unknown status |
NCT02512081 -
"The Lived Experience of Investigations for Sciatica"
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06179901 -
The Effect of Early MSAT Treatment on Sciatica Caused by Traffic Accidents
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT02951377 -
Mechanical Diagnosis and Treatment and/or Steroid Injections for Lumbar Radiculopathy
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT03347929 -
NSAIDs in Sciatica NSAIDS IN SCIATICA
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT04145310 -
BOL-DP-o-04 in Patients With Low Back Pain and Sciatica
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Enrolling by invitation |
NCT04660656 -
Predictive Value of the Five-repetition Sit-to-stand Test After Lumbar Spine surgerySTS-3 Study.
|
||
Completed |
NCT02644421 -
Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Analgesic Efficacy of VVZ-149 in Lumbar Radiculopathy (Sciatica)
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT00991172 -
A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Subcutaneously Administered REGN475(SAR164877) in Patients With Sciatic Pain
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT00668434 -
Effectiveness of Oral Prednisone in Improving Physical Functioning and Decreasing Pain in People With Sciatica
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT00749996 -
Herniectomy Versus Herniectomy With a Spinal Stabilization System for the Treatment of Complex Disc Disease
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT00246948 -
The Efficacy of Active Conservative Treatment for Patients With Severe Sciatica. A Randomized Clinical Controlled Trial
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04155450 -
Effects of Extension Biased External Limb Loading in Addition to McKenzie Extension Protocol in Lumbar Derangement Syndrome
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02284542 -
NAPS: Non-awake Versus Awake Placement of Spinal Cord Stimulators
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT02770963 -
Efficacy of Acupuncture for Discogenic Sciatica
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00364572 -
Efficacy of Epidural Etanercept in the Treatment of Sciatica
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT00470509 -
Adalimumab in Severe and Acute Sciatica
|
Phase 2 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03887962 -
Virtual Environment Rehabilitation for Patients With Motor Neglect Trial
|
N/A |